Skip to comments.
House Intel Chair Suspends Staff Member
Breitbart.Com ^
| 10-20-06
| Katherine Shrader
Posted on 10/20/2006 7:11:39 AM PDT by ritewingwarrior
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
I have been saying this for a long time that the leaks are coming from Dem staffers on the Intel Committee. I always had my money on Rockefeller and his peons. I surely hope that they can find evidence of this and route out all the treasonous scum in the Democratic Party.
To: ritewingwarrior
leakign secrets to the media! shades of Valerie Plame! why didn't they frog walk him out of the building?
2
posted on
10/20/2006 7:15:46 AM PDT
by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you)
To: ritewingwarrior
Surprise, surprise, surprise....
October surprise!
Get the little so and so and put him or her in prison for 10 or 15 years.*
(*This assumes a proper trial, and a determination of guilt. If innocent, we can straighten it all out in December, right after the Mark Foley thing is finished up)
3
posted on
10/20/2006 7:16:23 AM PDT
by
lOKKI
(You can ignore reality until it bites you in the ass.)
To: camle
Well, somebody leaked the report - and it wasn't a Republican.
4
posted on
10/20/2006 7:17:07 AM PDT
by
teddyballgame
(red man in a blue state)
To: ritewingwarrior
Is this a hint at George and Karls 72 hour surprise, massive intel leak scandel for Congressional dims.
5
posted on
10/20/2006 7:17:29 AM PDT
by
east1234
(It's the borders stupid. It's also WWIV.)
To: teddyballgame
Jane Harman of California, wrote to Hoekstra that she was "appalled" by his action, which was "without basis."
Me thinks the lady do protest too much.
6
posted on
10/20/2006 7:17:56 AM PDT
by
teddyballgame
(red man in a blue state)
To: ritewingwarrior
"Democrats say the Republican head of the House Intelligence Committee had no grounds to suspend a staff member who's come under scrutiny for the leak of a secret intelligence assessment."Looks like they got the right guy this time - the dems are squeelin.
7
posted on
10/20/2006 7:17:57 AM PDT
by
WorkerbeeCitizen
(Religion of peace my arse - We need a maintenance Crusade - piss on islam)
To: ritewingwarrior
"The Intelligence Committee's top Democrat, Jane Harman of California, wrote to Hoekstra that she was "appalled" by his action,"
I bet she is...
8
posted on
10/20/2006 7:19:02 AM PDT
by
babygene
To: WorkerbeeCitizen
I hope the "element of surprise" was used to include impounding a PC.
9
posted on
10/20/2006 7:19:07 AM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
( I am sitting under my cone of silence, inside a copper wire cage wearing a tin foil hat...)
To: ritewingwarrior
Why can't he be identified?
Well, time to get the usual suspects together... dig time.
10
posted on
10/20/2006 7:19:10 AM PDT
by
AliVeritas
(Caliphate News Network... Whores for terrorists.)
To: WorkerbeeCitizen
Now they need to look into the links between these same staffers and the Wiretap and SWIFT programs. I want to see one of these liberals swing.
11
posted on
10/20/2006 7:19:35 AM PDT
by
ritewingwarrior
(Where does free speech end, and sedition begin?)
To: east1234
12
posted on
10/20/2006 7:19:46 AM PDT
by
AliVeritas
(Caliphate News Network... Whores for terrorists.)
To: ritewingwarrior
The first thing they should have done was grab the Times reporter and editorial staff and put them in gitmo.
Before this is done, the Dems will be screaming "political vendetta" and "illegal wiretapping" although I would bet there were search warrants on the phone lines.
13
posted on
10/20/2006 7:20:35 AM PDT
by
Paloma_55
(I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
To: ritewingwarrior
Jane Harman of California, wrote to Hoekstra that she was "appalled" by his action, which was "without basis."
May she so testify...at the staffer's treason trial.
14
posted on
10/20/2006 7:20:56 AM PDT
by
ErnBatavia
(Meep Meep)
To: teddyballgame; All
I saw her on CSPAN after Hoekstra a couple weeks ago... the callers were straight out of FR (it seemed), one asked her point blank if she was the one leaking. I fell off my chair.
BTW, this is who they're hurting...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSbCnWe6e1o
15
posted on
10/20/2006 7:21:59 AM PDT
by
AliVeritas
(Caliphate News Network... Whores for terrorists.)
To: ErnBatavia
Hey DUmies, this is what an October Surprise is suppose to look like.
16
posted on
10/20/2006 7:22:40 AM PDT
by
teddyballgame
(red man in a blue state)
To: ritewingwarrior
A conference call to the committee's nine Democrats on Wednesday to inform them of the aide's suspension prompted outrage, said two congressional officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about internal committee business.
What do we get from this quote?
A) These congressional officials are Dems
B) They have not learned
C) Which part of "Unauthorized to speak" do they not get?!??
17
posted on
10/20/2006 7:25:01 AM PDT
by
Paloma_55
(I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
To: teddyballgame
i was just wondering why there isn't the hue and cry that there was when the dems thought rove outed plame.
where's the investigation? the special prosecutor? the indignant talk show hosts?
18
posted on
10/20/2006 7:26:13 AM PDT
by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you)
To: Paloma_55
According to another report this individual requested the document from Negroponte three days before the leak. I wonder if the version supplied had special language in it which if quoted directly would point to the individual.
19
posted on
10/20/2006 7:26:55 AM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
( I am sitting under my cone of silence, inside a copper wire cage wearing a tin foil hat...)
To: ritewingwarrior
Have you noticed that the word treason never seems to apply to domocrats? Why is it when they do something really wrong we don't get to shout to the sky about it? Why is it our fault for doing something about the wrong doers?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson