Posted on 10/16/2006 2:09:32 PM PDT by Conservative Coulter Fan
I would be just as against anyone of another religions that would do the same to Evangelicals..........would you?
My view of politicians is that they are employees of the people. I'm not particularly "against" any of them. I just try to "hire" the most qualified with my vote.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A24561-2005Feb14.html
This Democrat hack receives the tiresome, predictable golden microphone reserved for Bush-bashers provided by that wonderfully reputable and unquestionably credible venue, 60 Minutes.
[Sound effect: Whoopee Cushion playing "Colonel Bogie's March" from Bridge Over the River Kuo up full, fade to black, credits: BROUGHT TO YOU BY SWAMP-O-CRAT SEPTIC BACKFLUSH "If it doesn't smell right, it's still technically accurate".]
Many a true word. I wonder what tipped them off about Robertson.
His talk of diverting hurricanes, praying for judges to keel over dead, diagnosing Sharone's stroke as punishment from God, babbling about receiving divine weather reports, or his claim that he can leg press 2,000 lbs.
YAWN to the MSM and the writers of the craposhere...
when they don't even acknowledge conservative books like BOR's book #1 sales around the country, you know that the agenda is set and NO ONE is getting between them and the cameras...
liars, freaks and transparent no-goodniks.
BUMP Phil!
Thanks for the ping!
Don't suppose you noticed this guy says Christians ought to quit talking about abortion and focus on "helping" the poor - right out of the Jim Wallis, Sojourners, faux-evangelical playbook.
Fact is anyone who knows anything about evangelicals already knows evangelicals do plenty for the poor right now, and don't see any need to trade off concern for the living poor for concern for the slaughter of the unborn innocents.
Don't believe a thing this guy says. He's just another hit in the most sophisticated October surprise I've ever seen the Democrats and MSM devise.
Look, it matters not if Bush is surrounded by advisors laughing at evangelicals. What you should be asking yourself is which party is friendlier toward abortion, which party is friendlier toward extending marriage to homosexuals, which party is opposed to school choice, which party is opposed to gun-owner rights, etc. I think when you answer those questions, if you are a conservative, family-values voter you will know how to vote, regardless of whether anyone in the White House is laughing at evangelicals.
Disaffected liberal. Nothing more to see here...
Politics is not the answer but this guy publishes a book to attack Republicans in the eyes of evangelicals just before an important mid-term election? LOL. Evidently, he thinks there is a right kind of politics that is the answer.
So, let's see. Someone who I never hear of wrote a book saying someone in the White House said some evangelical was nuts, and I'm supposed to stay home on election day.
Let me think about that.
Thinking.
Thinking.
Thinking.
Nah, f--- that. I'm still voting.
"The president of the United States promised he would be the leading lobbying on behalf of the poor. What better lobbyist could anybody get?" Kuo wonders.
Okay, so from the getgo he was a liberal wanting Govt money for welfare programs...
HE WAS A MOLE.
"This president is the finest Christian we've ever had in office and anyone who believes the crap this "Evangelical" is saying is beyond naive."
NEEDED SAYING.
One thing our President does is hold back from criticizing others. Maybe its a weakness, maybe its a virtue. I think the latter.
Certainly a trait the media hound writers lack.
Well, that just SCREAMS trustworthy, don't it? :p
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.