Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox News accused of lying about anti-Clinton ad ban
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | 10/16/2006 | WND

Posted on 10/15/2006 10:13:37 PM PDT by Impeach98

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

VIEW THE AD - CLICK HERE

1 posted on 10/15/2006 10:13:38 PM PDT by Impeach98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; Timesink; VPMWife78; Starman417; ajolympian2004; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; ...
FoxFan ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.

2 posted on 10/15/2006 10:14:36 PM PDT by nutmeg (National security trumps everything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Thanks for the PING. Should be interesting to see what happens now and how Fox handles this. They should have learned that "the coverup is worse than the crime!"


3 posted on 10/15/2006 10:16:18 PM PDT by Impeach98 (Anti-war protestors should try holding rallies in Damascus and Tehran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98

You got to wonder what the deal is with Rupert and Hillary.


4 posted on 10/15/2006 10:17:22 PM PDT by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (Psalm 9:17 The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98

That's the whole ad and FOX won't run it? All it says is that he didn't make WOT his top priority and
"he didn't have his eye on the ball".

Ailes is losing it.


5 posted on 10/15/2006 10:20:41 PM PDT by happinesswithoutpeace (You are receiving this broadcast as a dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98

Bump!


6 posted on 10/15/2006 10:21:25 PM PDT by F-117A (They say there is no such thing as an ex-Marine,.Murtha disproves that!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98

And after I stood up for them on the other thread. If the call for verification was horse hockey and they simply didn't want to face the Clintonistas, shame on them!


7 posted on 10/15/2006 10:22:04 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Prayers for our patriot brother, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub. Brian, we're all pulling for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: happinesswithoutpeace
Yep, that is the entire ad. Ridiculous that they refused to show it. But down right offensive that they would then lie about it. Shame on them. They need to reverse course pronto, issue a public apology and put this thing behind them.
8 posted on 10/15/2006 10:22:43 PM PDT by Impeach98 (Anti-war protestors should try holding rallies in Damascus and Tehran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98

I have seen attack ads this quarter that make that thing look like a hallmark card.

*shrug*


9 posted on 10/15/2006 10:23:39 PM PDT by happinesswithoutpeace (You are receiving this broadcast as a dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98

Okay, I viewed the ad - - it's terrific and to the point. And now that I've seen it, Fox's refusal to air the ad is even more inexplicable than I had previously believed. Something stinks to high heaven and the stench is overwhelming. Somebody at Fox has some explaining to do.


10 posted on 10/15/2006 10:26:44 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98

Yet Fox plays the ad which seems to imply that Bush is responsible for genocide in Darfur all the time!


11 posted on 10/15/2006 10:29:08 PM PDT by maica (9/11 was not “the day everything changed”, but the day that revealed how much had already changed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: happinesswithoutpeace; durasell
Ailes is losing it.

It may not be Ailes' fault, but Murdoch's.

Per freeper durasell:
"Over the past year or so Murdoch has donated big to Clinton's charity, hosted Hillary at a breakfast meeting with editors and invited Bill as a paid speaker to a corporate retreat."

I have read previously that Murdoch is chummy with Mrs. Clinton. Perhaps this explains things?
I am disgusted.

12 posted on 10/15/2006 10:34:04 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Clinton really did drop the ball & miss many opportunities to capture bin Laden & the so called War on Terrorism was nowhere on his radar.


13 posted on 10/15/2006 10:50:12 PM PDT by Republic_of_Secession.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
I heard heard some of that, as well as some grumbling about a possible Murdoch endorsement for Hillary 08. I don't know the exact source for the quote but there was also some grumbling about Ailes (allegedly) saying he wanted to give Bill Clinton his own TV show.
14 posted on 10/15/2006 10:59:27 PM PDT by happinesswithoutpeace (You are receiving this broadcast as a dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Why disgusted? Murdoch is in business. That is to say, his ideologies and loyalties are not fixed. Please tell me this doesn't come as a surprise to you.


15 posted on 10/15/2006 11:14:30 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: durasell
Why disgusted?

You're not disgusted that the owner of Fox is in bed with corrupt scum like the Clintons? I guess you have a higher threshold for disgust than I do.

16 posted on 10/15/2006 11:42:59 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: maica
"Yet Fox plays the ad which seems to imply that Bush is responsible for genocide in Darfur all the time!

When Bush has done more to push action against Sudan on this issue at the UN than anyone else!!

17 posted on 10/15/2006 11:43:39 PM PDT by cookcounty (Coach Hastert: Good news! Your insurance DOES cover spine implants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Bill Clinton's Terrorism FAILURES!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzTQMjkVtcI

Ditto :

"... the owner of Fox is in bed with corrupt scum like the Clintons. "


18 posted on 10/15/2006 11:50:51 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

The Saudis own a significant chunk of News Corp, one of his major markets is in China/Asia, there's a huge chunk of business in western europe, and he's got significant interests in the middle east. How'd you like to do that juggling act?


19 posted on 10/15/2006 11:51:08 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

FOX could be focusing on the "fair and balanced" garbage.

I find as a conservative to be watching less of FOX
broadcasts. O'Reilly is o.k. but disagree with him regularly.
H&C total waste unless they can Holmes.

Focus on thre FREE REPUBLIC instead. Best compilation of news and social issues.


20 posted on 10/15/2006 11:54:29 PM PDT by ChiMark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson