Skip to comments.
Hastert Said Everyone to Testify Under Oath for Foley Invest?(Pelosi?Democrats?Staffers?Vanity)
Fox News Channel Broadcast ^
| 10/10/06
| Vanity
Posted on 10/10/2006 8:13:03 AM PDT by longtermmemmory
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Had FNC playing and they just had a Hassert press conference with Q and A. This is on Fox news.
Did speaker hassert just say that the investigation process will require everyone to be under oath?
I did not see a post of a Hassert Press conference live thread.
Pelosi is going to be testifying under oath if she is called.
Just thought it would be worth it to point this out if correct.
To: longtermmemmory
Before long the Democrats will spin this as a "Republican witch hunt"...ESPECIALLY if Democrats are called to testify.
2
posted on
10/10/2006 8:16:13 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: longtermmemmory
So the Repugs are still waving this Foley banner?
3
posted on
10/10/2006 8:16:20 AM PDT
by
zarf
To: longtermmemmory
George Soros?
4
posted on
10/10/2006 8:16:41 AM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: longtermmemmory
It's Hastert, not Hassert. Please ask the mod to change the spelling, and commit it to memory.
Typos are one thing; misspelling the name of the House Speaker is another thing altogether. It makes FR look stupid.
5
posted on
10/10/2006 8:16:54 AM PDT
by
MineralMan
(Non-evangelical Atheist)
To: longtermmemmory
The trap has been set.
RYMB!!!!
6
posted on
10/10/2006 8:17:12 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: rhombus
There is a world of difference when you have to raise your right hand.
If Pelosi spins this further, she will be called to testify since one of the pages in question actually works for HER.
I think this is a MOLON LABE moment.
7
posted on
10/10/2006 8:17:54 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: longtermmemmory
In the immortal words of Norman Stansfield:
EVERYONE!
8
posted on
10/10/2006 8:18:19 AM PDT
by
Thrusher
(“There’s nothing like the B-2 when it comes to giving peace a chance.")
To: zarf
Repugs? Cut it out. It's the Republican Party. That sounds like a DU thing.
9
posted on
10/10/2006 8:18:28 AM PDT
by
MineralMan
(Non-evangelical Atheist)
To: dfwgator
Oh please, please, please call the dems, especially Pelosi, to tesify under oath, it would be like an early Christmas present!
10
posted on
10/10/2006 8:19:12 AM PDT
by
LegalEagle61
(You have 2 choices vote republican or whine about how bad the country is when the liberals take over)
To: MineralMan
thanks done.
haste makes wastee
11
posted on
10/10/2006 8:20:38 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: longtermmemmory
THANK YOU HASERT FOR PUTTING THIS STORY RIGHT BACK ON THE FRONT PAGE!!!!!!!!!!
I WILL VOTE GOP BUT THESE JELLY-FISH MEDIA ASS KISSING CLOWNS MAKE IT HARD!
12
posted on
10/10/2006 8:21:42 AM PDT
by
Nav_Mom
To: LegalEagle61
"Oh please, please, please call the dems, especially Pelosi, to tesify under oath, it would be like an early Christmas present!"
It may be difficult to get her under oath, questions her, and then leak the testimony all before the elections. Get to work Hastert!
13
posted on
10/10/2006 8:21:45 AM PDT
by
teddyballgame
(red man in a blue state)
To: rhombus
The Democrats can't do it without the help of our Media Ass kissing GOP "Leaders"
Why in the hell did Hasert hold this New Conference?
It stinks of "I'm sorry, please forgive me"
are they morons?
14
posted on
10/10/2006 8:23:24 AM PDT
by
Nav_Mom
To: LegalEagle61
Pelosi and Rahm Emanuel have been behind this all along. By his parsing of words last weekend, Emanuel practically admitted as such.
I take heart in the fact that they had to spring this stink-bomb a month early, because the polls were turning against them.
Karl Rove, please do your thing.
15
posted on
10/10/2006 8:23:27 AM PDT
by
mwl1
To: Nav_Mom
This is not Hastert's story. He was accused of NOT protecting the children, how does one hide from that accusation.
Time has come to stop hiding under the covers when liberals expose their dark seedy underbelly.
To: Nav_Mom
It's HASTERT! Not HASERT.
For pete's sake, can we not at least get the spelling of the name of the Speaker of the House right? So far, that's two different misspellings.
Still, the shouting makes it OK, I guess....
17
posted on
10/10/2006 8:24:59 AM PDT
by
MineralMan
(Non-evangelical Atheist)
To: Just mythoughts
Hasert played right into the Dems hands......
Foley is gone, the investigation is on going
MOVE ON~!!!!!!!!!!!!
It was an idiot thing to do!
18
posted on
10/10/2006 8:25:21 AM PDT
by
Nav_Mom
To: Nav_Mom
think about this,
for Hastert to feel save to say this means he has some dirt which hurts the Dems if they have to testify.
Remember the DOJ has been very successful in prosecuting purgery cases. (ie Marth Stuart)
If the homosexual network is exposed and their democrat party protectors, that hurts the party of homosexuality, Democrats.
19
posted on
10/10/2006 8:25:40 AM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: mwl1
Pelosi and Rahm Emanuel have been behind this all along. By his parsing of words last weekend, Emanuel practically admitted as such.I'm waiting for Rahm to say, "I did not have lex with that email."
20
posted on
10/10/2006 8:25:44 AM PDT
by
Mike Bates
(Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson