Skip to comments.
N Korea 'preparing second test'
news.com.au ^
| October 10, 2006 01:00am
| From correspondents in Seoul
Posted on 10/09/2006 8:23:13 AM PDT by Sunshine55
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
To: HushTX
It is time for a Congressional Declaration of War!
To: Sunshine55
I say do a JFK, surround the North Korean part of the peninsula with nuclear subs & other naval nuke delivery systems and then tell that shemale midget and the rest of the world that he has 48 hours to dismantle his entire nuke facility or the whole country will become the world's largest radioactive cemetary!!!
62
posted on
10/09/2006 7:28:15 PM PDT
by
Stayfree
(Check out our Flush Hillary Calendar at FLUSH HILLARY CALENDAR.COM!)
To: Stayfree
spelled cemetery aka dirt nap area!
63
posted on
10/09/2006 7:31:16 PM PDT
by
Stayfree
(Check out our Flush Hillary Calendar at FLUSH HILLARY CALENDAR.COM!)
To: Sunshine55
there is a “sufficient possibility” of the North carrying out more nuclear tests. if they do the U.N. is really going to get serious. Not only will they discuss the test but the discussions will turn serious if there is a second test. The U.N. really means business this time. And if there is a third test they'll react with such resolve that North Korea will suffer the scorn of at least several members. That'll teach em.
To: Sunshine55
there is a “sufficient possibility” of the North carrying out more nuclear tests. if they do the U.N. is really going to get serious. Not only will they discuss the test but the discussions will turn serious if there is a second test. The U.N. really means business this time. And if there is a third test they'll react with such resolve that North Korea will suffer the scorn of at least several members. That'll teach em.
To: Sunshine55
there is a “sufficient possibility” of the North carrying out more nuclear tests. if they do the U.N. is really going to get serious. Not only will they discuss the test but the discussions will turn serious if there is a second test. The U.N. really means business this time. And if there is a third test they'll react with such resolve that North Korea will suffer the scorn of at least several members. That'll teach em.
To: APRPEH
Why are we waiting for a disfunctional security council that is a laughingstock, has done nothing about Iran but get half of itself bought, includes the Russians who knew about this test and its expected yield rather than the actual, and the Chinese who took the occasion to warn us, not the NKs, not to do anything about it, etc?
Please stop asking for permission from mortal enemies to lift a finger in our own defense. In case nobody noticed, it will not be forthcoming. If all you plan to do is pontificate and deprived them of ball point pens, by all means, farce your way to the graveyard.
67
posted on
10/09/2006 8:49:26 PM PDT
by
JasonC
To: ARealMothersSonForever
The Russians said what the yield was supposed to be because their clients told them what they were going to do in detail before they did it. They then made the mistake of quoting that planned yield to the press, before the reports that in fact it was a squib only a tenth that size.
68
posted on
10/09/2006 8:51:00 PM PDT
by
JasonC
To: Sunshine55
So how many rockets failed?
To: Sunshine55
Good; this will keep Foley off of the front pages of the nation's newspapers and off of cable news channels.
70
posted on
10/09/2006 8:53:39 PM PDT
by
no dems
(I'll take a moral Mormon over a demonic Democrat or repugnant RINO anyday.)
To: Joan Kerrey
I am anxiously awaiting the horrific UN reaction.
Hmmm. seems to be nothing. Oh well. There is always tomorrow. Unless we have a sissy response, deferring to Russia and China. Well, that is alright. The Democrats will assume the "position". And allow a rogue nation to dictate the terms of negotiation. Same as Slick Willie.
71
posted on
10/09/2006 8:54:27 PM PDT
by
ARealMothersSonForever
(We shall never forget the atrocities of September 11, 2001.)
Comment #72 Removed by Moderator
To: JasonC
The Russians said what the yield was supposed to be because their clients told them what they were going to do in detail before they did it. They then made the mistake of quoting that planned yield to the press, before the reports that in fact it was a squib only a tenth that size.You may be correct. The Paki's claimed that it was Plutonium, NOT Uranium. Who to trust? Russia?
73
posted on
10/09/2006 9:03:57 PM PDT
by
ARealMothersSonForever
(We shall never forget the atrocities of September 11, 2001.)
To: tflabo
I never trusted her when I had voted for Clinton.
To: ARealMothersSonForever
What in the world are you talking about? He is not my "queer congressman". I don't even live in Florida. Your post is bizarre.
Now, lay down the crack pipe and get a grip on reality.
75
posted on
10/09/2006 10:05:07 PM PDT
by
no dems
(I'll take a moral Mormon over a demonic Democrat or repugnant RINO anyday.)
To: Sunshine55
I hope they do fizzle away all their prutonium.
To: Bwanaman
for your information, Mr. Newbie, the NY Post is an EXCELLENT newspaper; that daily gives Hillary a good drubbing whenever it can.
77
posted on
10/09/2006 10:10:30 PM PDT
by
bitt
("And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm.")
To: Kimberly GG
I liked Glen Beck commentary on the whole thing.
Jist of it was while we are looking at Kim what is the ME up to, if Kim does acheive a nuke he will sell to the highest bidder and you bet the Pres. of Iran is tuning in to all of this.
78
posted on
10/10/2006 12:03:51 AM PDT
by
Global2010
(Tagline walking the dogs.)
To: Global2010
I really like Glen Beck....I've been tuned into fox almost exclusively since 9/11. Glen Beck is like a breath of fresh air! I happened on him by accident, just channel surfing, but I am really glad I did.
79
posted on
10/10/2006 12:57:28 AM PDT
by
Kimberly GG
(Tancredo '08)
To: Global2010
I really like Glen Beck....I've been tuned into fox almost exclusively since 9/11. Glen Beck is like a breath of fresh air! I happened on him by accident, just channel surfing, but I am really glad I did.
80
posted on
10/10/2006 12:57:32 AM PDT
by
Kimberly GG
(Tancredo '08)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson