Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Connecticut Senate: Lieberman Lead Reaches Double Digits [Go Lieberman!]
Rasmussen ^ | 10/06/06 | Rasmussen

Posted on 10/06/2006 6:48:15 PM PDT by freedom44

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 10/06/2006 6:48:16 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freedom44

I hope Lieberman wins, just Because Jimmy Carter hopes he loses.


2 posted on 10/06/2006 6:50:39 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
Whoda thunk that after only six years conservatives would be smiling to see Loserman winning an election?

Go, Joe!

3 posted on 10/06/2006 6:50:57 PM PDT by Rocko ("Ned Lamont doesn't know anything. You might as well vote for Michael Bolton." -- O'Reilly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

If Liberman says he will vote for McCain or Grahm for leader of the senate will you support them?


4 posted on 10/06/2006 6:51:02 PM PDT by Paul8148
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

First Democrat i've been rooting strongly for since Zell!


5 posted on 10/06/2006 6:51:21 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul8148

LOL...sure...what is the alternative? Ned Lament?

I am enjoying the concept, just to see the anti-war libs, as Rush says it, "Open the door into their noses..."

Sure, he is a lib. But he ain't as much of a loser as Lament!


6 posted on 10/06/2006 6:56:55 PM PDT by rlmorel (Islamofacism: It is all fun and games until someone puts an eye out. Or chops off a head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

Love that Zell Miller!


7 posted on 10/06/2006 7:00:32 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

He's a Democrat


8 posted on 10/06/2006 7:02:23 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: freedom44

What idiots are going to vote for that nutbag gambling addict Schlesinger?


10 posted on 10/06/2006 7:06:44 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gorobei
OK, hotshot. Give us the alternative. The GOP candidate is damaged goods. He will NOT win this.

So the choice here is between a social liberal who has a clue when it comes to the WOT, and an even more pronounced social liberal who has no clue when it comes to the WOT.

I know this is a toughie, so I'll give you a few minutes to think through it.

11 posted on 10/06/2006 7:07:52 PM PDT by dirtboy (Good fences make good neighbors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: bnelson44

More Conservative than some 'Republicans', labels are labels but whats the truth behind that label.


13 posted on 10/06/2006 7:10:24 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
...labels are labels but whats the truth behind that label.

He has said over and over again he will "caucus" with the Democrats. That means, that the vast majority of votes he will cast will be what the Democratic caucus wants him to cast.

The only thing that makes him like us is that he is in favor of the War on Terror.

And he is honest.

14 posted on 10/06/2006 7:21:45 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Paul8148

...."If Liberman says he will vote for McCain or Grahm for leader of the senate will you support them?"....

I would NEVER, EVER support ANYONE who would support John McCain! EVER!

Liberman does support the WOT. I will give him that. Other than that he is a total LIBERAL! But I am not sure who is the bigger liberal, Liberman or McCain?


15 posted on 10/06/2006 8:23:33 PM PDT by Mtner77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

It's beginning to look like the only Republican who will survive reelection in the Senate will be Joe Lieberman.


16 posted on 10/06/2006 8:28:10 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44

Liebersquish is a phony and dyed-in-the-wool liberal. When he gets re elected as an (I) then he will just be a de-facto (D) liberal back to his old tricks. I will admit he is a shade better than Lamont and his Moveon.org moron backers. So go Lieberman but his winning the election leads to miniscule value to conservatives..


17 posted on 10/06/2006 8:57:18 PM PDT by tflabo (Take authority that's ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tflabo

Tough to be a phony when everyone knows he's a Liberal and he doesn't deny it. Everyone knows he's a Democrat too, Leiberman would tell you that himself, he's forced to run as an Independent Dems because the Dem base is nuts.

Back to his old tricks? Who in the hell thinks that way? Most of us are quite damn aware he is a loyal Liberal Democrat and he'll behave as a Liberal Democrat and he's never denied that either. Though chances are he'll find a way every now and then to make the Dems regret they ever turned on him. So if by "tricks" you mean he'll be back in the Senate trying to push through a Liberal agenda as he promised to do well then, uh, yeah, thanks for the update. None of us knew that from the get go.

Win for conservatives? Overall probably not. Though maybe he'll throw a bone on a tie breaking vote now and then.

But I don't think concervatives are looking at Leiberman's race and supporting him for partisan gain. Leiberman's win is a win for AMERICANS that still believe this country is worth defending and are willing to use force to do so. Miniscule value for conservatives? Perhaps. For Americans? His win could be groundbreaking in getting the Dems in more moderate states to reject the anti-American left and THAT makes this all worth while.

The sooner we isolate the extremists from having any hold over the Dems in "red" or "swing" states we'll arrive at least at a 2/3rd majority willing to confront the terrorists head on. The sooner that happens, the sooner the will of the terrorists will fade. They've been emboldened by the Dems opposition, but if 2/3rd stand against them here? That is going to deal them a blow as well as some of their friends across the globe the Dems encouraged to stand against us as well.


18 posted on 10/06/2006 9:09:40 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (Kobach: Amnesty is going from an illegal to a legal position, without imposing the original penalty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Joe all the way...Tell Gpre to stuff..it too Jake


19 posted on 10/06/2006 9:16:14 PM PDT by sanjacjake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gorobei

You should give it a break. Did you actually read my post?


20 posted on 10/06/2006 9:59:11 PM PDT by rlmorel (Islamofacism: It is all fun and games until someone puts an eye out. Or chops off a head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson