Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Erwin Chemerinsky: Legislating Violations of the Constitution
wapo ^ | Saturday, September 30, 2006; 12:00 AM | Erwin Chemerinsky

Posted on 10/01/2006 5:14:44 PM PDT by Checkers

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: devolve

Now we can tell Kerry to go take a flying leap!!


41 posted on 10/01/2006 8:30:48 PM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

42 posted on 10/01/2006 9:01:06 PM PDT by devolve (-REFRESH- GRAPHICS---- --CITGO--HUGO--NOGO--NUKO--OSAMO--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Five bucks says that this Chemerinskty is either an atheist,a "reform" Jew or a Unitarian/Universalist

....what I do know....is that Erwin is definitely not a male model.

43 posted on 10/01/2006 9:04:08 PM PDT by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: devolve

That one is a delemma, want him to hop on one foot across the page, lol, tumble like Murtha? Do a split with pom poms in his hands??


44 posted on 10/01/2006 9:04:32 PM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Checkers
Hugh Hewitt understands the power of logic and reason, and of the original intent of the Constitution. He gives Chemerinskty a radio forum because he illustrates the "best" arguments that the left has, and those are mainly specious and misleading. Too often, Chemerinskty shows us why we are burdened by the modern liberal "activist" court, and why they do not care what original intent is, as they will argue against it when it suits their agenda, and yet bring up original intent when it suits that same agenda. This is more than disingenuous, it is intellectually corrupt, and a threat to the individual freedoms the Constitution protects.
45 posted on 10/01/2006 10:41:49 PM PDT by Richard Axtell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
My first time around with Chemerinsky was during CA's Prop 209 (repealing preferential affirmative action), specifically, clause 'c'. Chemerinsky asserted that if Prop 209 were voted into Law, women's rights would be rolled back a million years. Men would be permitted in girl's locker rooms, etc. There's been lots of incidences of Chemerinsky "involvements" in cases since then, usually and only those cases with MSM interest. Confirmation Hearings. Anti-Rumsfeld ism. Electoral voting. Blah de blah.

I've read many of his opinions since 1995. I don't think he's very bright. But what he knows how to do is focus upon a particular set of wordings and base an entire platform upon his interpretation of a wee point. And write VOLUMES about his interpretation. This then, markets him up into the prime-time media venues, and permits his allied coalition socialist groups something to "hang on to" and bang their pots about". He's usually wrong. And despite the fact that his opinions and intepretations turn out wrong, doesn't seem to matter to those who vaunt Erwin Chemerinsky.

46 posted on 10/02/2006 3:54:05 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Checkers
He's got a slight Marty Feldman thing going on with his eyes.

Probably from too many years trying to keep one eye on signals from the ACLU and the other eye on signals from the DNC while standing in the spotlight. It happens, I hear...

47 posted on 10/02/2006 3:55:41 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Tell me what he was involved in lately -- why does that name ring a bell?

I think he was one of the lawyers involved in the Wilson/Plame civil suit against Rove, Cheney and Libby.

48 posted on 10/02/2006 6:32:32 AM PDT by TravisBickle (Are you talkin' to me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BookmanTheJanitor
...Erwin is definitely not a male model.

He prefers male models. I wonder if he's done any instant messaging recently.

49 posted on 10/02/2006 5:49:44 PM PDT by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: devolve

There is NO way Kerry could be any gayer.


50 posted on 10/02/2006 10:19:23 PM PDT by dixiechick2000 (There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Checkers
The 1st Amendment protects the rights of individuals to practice their faith....not just in private . But according to the dictates of their own conscience.

Forcing anyone to take part in activity that violates their code of ethics is a religion in and of itself. More accurately a bullying cult.

51 posted on 05/22/2016 2:29:21 PM PDT by RTRs Tom Lacovara Stewart (14th Amendment, 1st Amendment, Religious Liberty,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson