Skip to comments.
CA: Doctor says ethics stopped him from aiding execution
ap on Riverside Press Enterprise ^
| 9/27/06
| David Kravets - ap
Posted on 09/28/2006 11:23:44 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: NormsRevenge
But there is NO constitutional problem with starving an innocent woman in a coma to death. But we are damned if we allow murderers to die begging for the deaths they dished out to their victims. I thought the purpose of punishment is to make the criminal suffer for his crime? Where did we go wrong as a society worrying about the tender psyches of murderers??
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus
2
posted on
09/28/2006 11:26:38 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: NormsRevenge
Executions shouldn't require a doctor to do anything but pronounce the subject dead. The only choice to be made is bullet, rope, or pike.
3
posted on
09/28/2006 11:39:48 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(Islam delenda est)
To: goldstategop
I thought the purpose of punishment is to make the criminal suffer for his crime?That may be the nature of punishment, but it isn't -- and has never been -- the purpose of punishment. Suffering itself isn't an end. Moreover, the doctor's refusal to assist in the execution has nothing to do with the merits of the death penalty in general, and everything to do with the specific ethics of the medical profession, which prevents the harming of life. Blame Hypocrates.
4
posted on
09/28/2006 11:59:40 PM PDT
by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
To: NormsRevenge
Man, they gotta bring back the good ole electric chair.
To: Lancey Howard
Guillotine. No drugs.
No pain. Over in .0002 of a second. Apprehension, yes.
To: poetknowit
I think I read here that Marie Antoinette (and others) were placed on the guillotine face up.
To: Alter Kaker
You are correct and I don't doubt that a large percentage of people who are not even bound by a Hippocratic Oath would refuse to be an agent of the State in a matter of this nature. And that is a good thing. As such, being the responsibility of the State, then effective efficiency should be the goal. Also maintaining reasonable expense. The State could execute for a lot less then it does now if not for misguided sensibilities....Pronouncing death should be a Doctor's only professional duty in this matter, IMO.
8
posted on
09/29/2006 1:55:30 AM PDT
by
KDD
(A wink is as good as a nod to a blind horse.)
To: KDD
I agree. The doctor was in the right on this one. He has sworn to do no harm.
9
posted on
09/29/2006 2:15:30 AM PDT
by
GOPyouth
(De Oppresso Liber! The Tyrant is captured!)
To: NormsRevenge
wonder if he would be so ethical when asked to perform an abortion?
10
posted on
09/29/2006 3:54:59 AM PDT
by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you)
To: camle
Perhaps he would. There are many, many, doctors who hold human life sacred. You are making a common fallacy: stereotyping a person based on perceived group characteristics.
11
posted on
09/29/2006 4:06:38 AM PDT
by
GAB-1955
(being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
To: goldstategop
death by 90 story drop....no pain at all...
12
posted on
09/29/2006 4:16:20 AM PDT
by
joe fonebone
(Israel, taking out the world's trash since 1948.)
To: GAB-1955
i certainly HOPE he would.
13
posted on
09/29/2006 4:37:09 AM PDT
by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you)
To: GAB-1955
I doubt very seriously that he holds many lives sacred.
At the very least, the girl this man killed.
But doctors don't need to be involved in excutions any more than lawyers need to be on the battlefield.
14
posted on
09/29/2006 4:42:10 AM PDT
by
LadyPilgrim
((Sealed my Pardon with HIS BLOOD!!! Hallelujah!!! What a Savior))
To: NormsRevenge
Now if the eyes of the rest of the doctors would be opened while they're executing innocent babies - - -
43,000,000 children murdered since Row vs. Wade was shoved down our throats.
15
posted on
09/29/2006 4:43:11 AM PDT
by
RoadTest
( Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution. -2 Tim. 3:12)
To: LadyPilgrim
I doubt very seriously that he holds many lives sacred. At the very least, the girl this man killed. You have absolutely no grounds to make such an accusation.
I could doubt very seriously that you are even remotely intelligent. But, I have no grounds for that, so I won't - yet.
To: KDD
Here's my MD take on this.
I'm pro death penalty. If being the executioner were assigned by lottery, I'd pull the switch, trigger or trapdoor and go home and eat dinner.
But I would not use my particular skills for this purpose. I think the use of medical staff and medical tools to carry out this function is a sign of social decay, and I want no part of it.
17
posted on
09/29/2006 4:47:24 AM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Who you gonna call?)
To: Alter Kaker; goldstategop
I wonder if this doctor has ever performed an abortion?..
..are his 'ethics' genuine.....or selective?
To: Lancey Howard
Is this true?...Never heard it before.
To: Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit
Maybe so......not everyone is as intelligent as some assume,
but your personal attack on me is totally out of line.
Perhaps you should read the directions on posting to another.
Thank you very much.
Now...to the subject at hand...
The death penalty in this country has been picked and prodded and torn apart and completely done away with at times, and I for one, am tired of liberals trying to make out like the lives of depraved criminals are more important than the victims.
BTW... if I offended you, please forgive me. I was talking about the man in the article.
20
posted on
09/29/2006 5:58:43 AM PDT
by
LadyPilgrim
((Sealed my Pardon with HIS BLOOD!!! Hallelujah!!! What a Savior))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson