Skip to comments.
DNA Tests Help Uncover Forgotten History
("slave ancestors had been raped by their owners")
DiversityInc.com ^
| September 22, 2006
| "Compiled" by the DiversityInc staff
Posted on 09/23/2006 4:24:32 PM PDT by flowerplough
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Yes, "some of his slave ancestors had been raped by their owners", but some likely also consented to sex with their owners. In addition, some of Rabb's non-slave ancestors were probably Africans who captured and sold African slaves, as some Africans still do, to this day. One of my ancestors, I'm proud to proclaim, was a member of the Grand Army of the Republic, the only volunteer army in history to bleed and die to free slaves that were neither relative nor compatriot.
To: AdmSmith; AnalogReigns; caryatid; CobaltBlue; concentric circles; Domestic Church; Doodle; ...
To: flowerplough
3
posted on
09/23/2006 4:28:04 PM PDT
by
Ganymede
To: flowerplough
Bet one of my ancestors shot him.
To: flowerplough
So some of us white folks could collect reparations too?
5
posted on
09/23/2006 4:30:06 PM PDT
by
claptrap
(optional tag-line under reconsideration)
To: flowerplough
How did this pinhead come to the conclusion that his ancestors were "raped?" Maybe they were just two "consenting adults" engaging in a little "diversity" if you get my drift.
6
posted on
09/23/2006 4:30:08 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(You can't defeat your enemy unless you are willing to get down in the mud with him.)
To: flowerplough
Taking a guess--since I have no statistics--I would bet that Most blacks probably 80% who have slave ancesters have some white blood in them.You can look at America's blacks and tell them from their Nigerian cousins. His surprise is surprising. Maybe he never studied history . Like the previous poster said , many of them were probably raped , others got special favors for sex, it runs the gamut of reasons.
7
posted on
09/23/2006 4:30:13 PM PDT
by
sgtbono2002
(The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
To: U S Army EOD
8
posted on
09/23/2006 4:32:17 PM PDT
by
Godebert
To: sgtbono2002
He's not surprised; he's just sensationalizing. In 500 years there has been every form of monkey business including the apartheid of the black community today.
9
posted on
09/23/2006 4:33:35 PM PDT
by
ClaireSolt
(Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
To: flowerplough
Either that, or some young lady decided that the job of the boss's mistress beat picking cotton in the fields.
To: flowerplough
Grand Army of the Republic, the only volunteer armyWhile your ancestor may have volunteered, the GAR wasn't an all-volunteer army.
And I hope that the author of the story is ready to pay into a reparation fund on behalf of his slave-owning ancestors.
11
posted on
09/23/2006 4:34:49 PM PDT
by
PAR35
To: Godebert
So this moron thinks he's discovered gravity?
Slaves were property. That was the law at the time.
My family has lived in North American since 1619. And no, I am not responsible for acts that took place before I was born.
And no, you can't go back and change the law to make someone feel happy.
We don't "do" ex post facto laws in America.
I would suggest someone get a life and move on. Everyone else has... a long time ago.
12
posted on
09/23/2006 4:35:57 PM PDT
by
sdillard
To: sgtbono2002
I would bet that Most blacks probably 80% who have slave ancesters have some white blood in them.Social anthropology is a hobby of sorts of mine and I would guess that number to be between 95%-98% of American blacks (ones who can trace their ancestry to slaves). And you are right, the surprising thing is this guy's surprise - he's a pin head.
To: sgtbono2002
In ten thousand years, and maybe within a thousand years, most, if not all, humans will be of mixed race. Races developed because of geographic isolation.
Modern transportation and the development of the third world has been changing that dramatically.
The elimination of races probably would be a net plus for the planet. One less thing to fight about.
14
posted on
09/23/2006 4:40:17 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: FlingWingFlyer
"Ka-Ching", money, money, money!!! It's all about money. Next step is to file a civil suit against the descendent's of his ancestors owners for reparations. Follow the money....
To: flowerplough
"some of his slave ancestors had been raped by their owners", but some likely also consented to sex with their owners.
Thanks for including that part about consent. Obviously it's never right to own another person but it's fallacy to believe that all or even a majority of slaves were treated badly. Mistreatment of slaves is counter productive. A mistreated slave is a slave that wants to run and becomes a problem. Mistreatment leads to injuries and less productivity. A malnourished slave is unproductive.
The fact is that slaves were an enormous financial investment and I suspect an emotional one as well.
16
posted on
09/23/2006 4:41:56 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: martin_fierro
17
posted on
09/23/2006 4:42:53 PM PDT
by
Mercat
(Show me what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman.)
To: flowerplough
Since he has white blood does he have to share in the white guilt burden?
To: sgtbono2002
Just a reminder.
A Geneologist did studies on decendents from a prominent Zulu woman.
It was found that Pieter Botha, President of South Africa, and leader of the Oxcart Wing of the Nationalist Party was decended from her. In short, the entire reason for apartheit went down the tubes. And that was before DNA testing was routine.
Geneologies are usually falsified, to claim ancestors. Tracing decendents is much harder to falsify. As they say, Mules always claim their ancestors are horses!
Famous examples: Mahomet's decendants include one Brooke Shields as well as Queen ElizabethII. That's not counting various descendents by several very attractive young shegoats.
19
posted on
09/23/2006 4:49:17 PM PDT
by
donmeaker
(If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy!" then my ex wife is out of town.)
To: flowerplough
The races were really muddled in Louisiana. How about the free blacks that humped whites? Nawww....that couldn't have happened.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson