Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The house that Jacques unbuilt-French change in position leave Rice coalition in tatters
Jerusalem Post ^ | 9-21-06 | AMIR TAHERI

Posted on 09/21/2006 5:53:23 AM PDT by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 09/21/2006 5:53:24 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel.

also Keywords 2006israelwar or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

2 posted on 09/21/2006 5:54:29 AM PDT by SJackson (The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

If she was truly suprised by this then she wouldn't make a good President.


3 posted on 09/21/2006 5:55:18 AM PDT by aynrandfreak (Islam came up with "Zero" to describe the rest of their creative output)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Why is this news? early surrender nothing new for the French.


4 posted on 09/21/2006 5:56:39 AM PDT by bikerman (Democrats the cut and run party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Jacques Chirac got paid off from Iran and the Devil Chevez.
5 posted on 09/21/2006 6:03:06 AM PDT by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bikerman

We need another list of French products....so we can not buy them......


6 posted on 09/21/2006 6:04:44 AM PDT by Youngman442002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

"Anything other than negotiations would be resolutely opposed by France."

That is NOT skill or mediation and certainly not diplomacy... that is SURRENDER.

He does not comprehend that surrender is NOT peace. Someone please tell him… go on, tell him before he makes himself ridiculous.

So is this the outcome of centuries of the widely praised, globally avowed pre-eminence of French diplomatic prowess? What am I thinking… that legend died a long time ago.


7 posted on 09/21/2006 6:05:42 AM PDT by SMARTY ("Stay together, pay the soldiers and forget everything else." Lucius Septimus Severus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

Amazing what burning cars can do.


8 posted on 09/21/2006 6:09:24 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz ("Freedom by its nature cannot be imposed, it must be chosen")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

One thing Chavez said was right yesterday, and that was that certain members of the SC should not be there as permanent members. France being the primary one. They are a worthless country, who throw around the only power they have, and that is the veto in the SC. France's power waned decades ago, and it is harming our country's diplomacy efforts when France steps in with their hairbrained ideas.


9 posted on 09/21/2006 6:09:55 AM PDT by ritewingwarrior (Where does free speech end, and sedition begin?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

HOw much in oil vouchers did Iamjihadmadman promise Chirac this week at the UN to change his mind?


10 posted on 09/21/2006 6:13:58 AM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

The Algerians are going to Hit Paris soon. I hate for anyone to die but France needs a Wake up call


11 posted on 09/21/2006 6:15:20 AM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
What would be the down side of letting the world know we are moving to a back seat position in all these situations. Let the French and others know we are there if they call but they should just keep us informed.

As we allow the French and their friends to continue their "dialogue" we will strengthen the nuclear defense in Israel just in case the "dialogue" does proceed in a suitable manner.

12 posted on 09/21/2006 6:21:43 AM PDT by JIM O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Sanctions? Heck. Try bunker-busters, daisy-cutters, and tactical nukes.


13 posted on 09/21/2006 6:23:50 AM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Gee--a French innovation on the world scene---the pre-emptive surrender (i.e. surrendering before hostilities commence).

WHAT A COUNTRY!!!

14 posted on 09/21/2006 6:28:46 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The Americans would appear, fire a few missiles, bomb a few sites and go away

Serious miscalculation. Deadly in fact.
15 posted on 09/21/2006 6:35:01 AM PDT by steel_resolve (Do you know what a bigot is? Someone winning an argument with a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"A limited military clash would suit Ahmadinejad fine," says a former cabinet minister. "The Americans would appear, fire a few missiles, bomb a few sites and go away. Ahmadinejad would show on TV some old ladies and babies killed by the Americans, declare victory and pursue his grand plans with renewed vigor."

So, according to the author of this article, the Bush administration is incapable of thinking past this boxed-in scenario. Amir should avoid playing poker with Texans, unless he has no need for the money he lays on the table.

16 posted on 09/21/2006 6:37:30 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"There will be no war against Iran," Chirac is reported to have told a special emissary of the Islamic Republic who visited him in Paris last week. "Anything other than negotiations would be resolutely opposed by France." History may not be repeating itself, but it is hard not to remember similar pledges Chirac gave to Saddam Hussein up to March 2003, just weeks before the US-led coalition invaded Iraq."

The irony here is that Chirac's action probably increases the probability that the USA will be forced to strike Iran's nuke facilities. Just as with Iraq.
17 posted on 09/21/2006 7:16:14 AM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

Bingo. Look for a new Total-Fina-Elf contract with Iran in the coming weeks.


18 posted on 09/21/2006 7:31:42 AM PDT by pierrem15 (Charles Martel: past and future of France)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Face it, they don't care. The first to be hurt are Israel and the United States. Just like the little cowards they are, this is no surprise. They are NO friend of the United States and need to be declared such. I'm sick of the backslapping and excuses from Bush.


19 posted on 09/21/2006 8:39:16 AM PDT by bushfamfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Chiracs MULTIPLE and ABSOLUTELY CONTRADICTORY flip-flops the other day were stunning. There was Frog all over the F'n map.


20 posted on 09/21/2006 9:37:17 AM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson