Posted on 09/14/2006 4:31:48 AM PDT by drpix
As to people like Singer that advocate sex with animals also, I would give an unequivocal "Yes".
"An internationally known Princeton "bioethicist" and animal-rights activist says he'd kill disabled babies"
Well his kind gladly kill em when their healthy so why wouldn't he kill em if they were disabled ???
Only that this A$$hole has been written up several times on FR for essentially saying the same things.
It's always the same old eugenics tripe, people get very emotional and upset about him, (which they should), and some people who have had it up to here with politics as usual and have decided to sit this one out get up their resolve to defeat the Liberal Bastards at the polls one more time.
It's useful for enervating the base. In this case I posited that he is being used by the party to energise the conservative base who are not excited by the dweebs, (our dweebs), who wish to get into or remain in office.
Kinda like burning the Reichstag.
I am becoming very cynical in my older years.
Check out Dean Koontz's political contributions: http://www.newsmeat.com/celebrity_political_donations/Dean_Koontz.php.
Also, after reading about 15 of his books you can definitely see that he is a conservative. He's the antithesis to Stephen King who is a lib.
I believe that your theory is quite plausible. What better way to get the fires going than to drag up dregs like this?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.