Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Crunch time" for the Moobats re: ABC's Path to 911
Email f rom the DNC | Sept 8, 2006 | Tom McMahon

Posted on 09/08/2006 3:02:20 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 next last
To: Caipirabob

Well said.... and thank you for the memories.


101 posted on 09/08/2006 5:00:49 PM PDT by Gator113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Alia

I would agree with you if they didn't get caught in this same kind of trap over and over and over. It's almost more predictable than the sun rising.


102 posted on 09/08/2006 5:01:07 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Yes they are, and the problem is that the world has already sen the clips that they want removed from the movie! The political idiocy of this move is astounding!

Fox News has been playing the clips repeatedly for two days; everyone in the press is writing about this farce, and it has flooded the internet.

What fools these mortals be!

103 posted on 09/08/2006 5:01:57 PM PDT by Constitution1st (Never, never, never quit - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan
This is also a warning shot at the other networks. Notice how quiet they've been.

Anybody think MAJORITY leader Frist will make a speech in the senate castigating MINORITY leader Reid for having the audacity to threaten ABC and branding it as Fascistic
104 posted on 09/08/2006 5:03:41 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Man, if they're pulling out Richard Clarke as someone who knows the real truth, they are panicing big time.

From what I have read the show makes him look like a hero type
How accurate is that ?

Tommy Franks said he wasn't even in the loop
105 posted on 09/08/2006 5:07:48 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: feedback doctor; All

I just heard a caller on Hugh Hewitt's show called Bob Iger's office directly. He was put right through to his voicemail. He left a positive message, telling him to please stand his ground, that the First Amendment protects him.

E-mails are a dime a dozen, maybe the phone call IS the way to go. I am hesitant to put the phone number here, as there may be nutters that do not have it. Should I list it or do it by FReepmail?

I am not exactly certain how I should handle this on FR. What do you all think?


106 posted on 09/08/2006 5:08:59 PM PDT by Shelayne (...And though my heart is torn, I will praise You in this storm... ~~Casting Crowns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

Liberals will always keep one of their own flush with cash. Just look at Schrillary, what has she done as a Senator....absolutely nothing. Yet she'll be re-elected in spades, and will probably run for President. Why? just what has she done at any time in her miserable life to justify this.

Think about the cattle futures deal. It's not like she was so smart that she could turn $1000 into $100,000. It was a payoff to keep her on the reservation, and look the other way at Slick's many indescretions. The Senator thing was a payoff for her not going off the reservation with the Blue dress.

Bill's intellect could fill a thimble, but the liberal establishment won't let him A) go to jail B) end up poor.


107 posted on 09/08/2006 6:01:24 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Don't you think it's interesting how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

I thought this story was still "hot", it seems to have waned alot on FR since yesterday.

and you are correct - the republicans won't say a word about this.


108 posted on 09/08/2006 6:05:33 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

This shows how much they still control.

If Chris Wallace of Fox News Sunday can unilaterally order a boycott of the story for this sunday.

The fact the Democrat party tendrils extend this far into the MSM that OUT OF OFFICE clintonistas can exert such "access" pressure (obey or we cut you off from reporting about us) is truly perverted and disgusting.


109 posted on 09/08/2006 6:33:29 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

BTTT!


110 posted on 09/08/2006 8:59:03 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
The Democrats did control what the public knew and learned. Their control has been getting less and less. ............ Please do not believe that. ............ What?

Please don't believe that the Democrats/old media are losing their power or control. Sure, their numbers are going down as newspapers lose readership and the nightly old media newscasts are dying. But they are getting their lying message out very much the same, maybe even stronger, but in somewhat different ways.

Shows like Letterman and Leno, and Stewart's fill the young heads with constant anti-conservative jokes and propaganda. The advertising and the entertainment business in general do the same. And the old Dem/liberal media just lies more blatantly now. Look at the three years of destruction of the image of the honesty of the Bush administration from this bullsh*t investigation, Plamgate.

No, the Dems/liberal media still have GREAT CONTROL (I prefer to use the word "effect") over public opinion!

How do you explain the huge numbers of the general public who think that the economy is poor when it is actually pretty good? Answer: the constant drumbeat of negative stories by the media -- constant outright lies.

So.............. don't believe what you wrote. It's dead wrong.

I wish you were right, I've been watching and studying the media for around 45 years .

The old media is still a very effective monster.

****

The socialist/marxist/liberal media is the most destructive, relentless, and ruthless enemy of this Republic.

****

I hope that answers your question.

111 posted on 09/09/2006 12:14:47 AM PDT by beyond the sea ( A tree fell in woods, a conservative wasn't around, would it still kill the liberal chained to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

Re: http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=22477_Path_to_9-11_Web_Address_Hijacked&only


That's terrible what they are doing!


112 posted on 09/09/2006 12:21:56 AM PDT by MaineVoter2002 (http://www.cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I'm thinking that ABC will still air this movie because of RATINGS. The ratings for this TV movie would definitely be thru the roof. ABC can't resist something like that no matter the whining of the Democrats.


113 posted on 09/09/2006 12:37:45 AM PDT by PJ-Comix (Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

bttt


114 posted on 09/09/2006 12:41:28 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Dear Jim,

This is it: crunch time

LMAO

by God don't ever mention the flat out facts that Clinton screwed the pooch everyway but loose on getting bin Laden and taking terrorism seriously and it is those facts that ABC is wanting it's audience to know

ABC doesn't seem to get it, it's only the Bush administration who has done wrong, didn't Disney get the memo?


115 posted on 09/09/2006 12:49:21 AM PDT by Lib-Lickers 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy
"Why aren't Republican's SCREAMING BLOODY MARY about the letter that THREATENED ABC'S LICENSE!!"

Good question. And, why aren't Republican's reminding the public about Sandy Berger's STEALING OF TOP SECRET DOCUMENTS from the National archives, and his supposed "loss" of some of them, and his possible "editing" of others-Directly related to the rats near hysterical reaction to a TV show- IMO-i.e. What are they trying to hide?.

If the dems want to raise such a fuss over this-let's have an investigation into the previous administrations roll in 9/11 as a mattter of public service. The people have a right to know what happened.

HELLOOOOO! WAKE UP AMERICA!

116 posted on 09/09/2006 1:20:33 AM PDT by Pajamajan (Liberalism=suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I like the way they want to look at an "honest" picture of 9/11. But to start only ON 9/11. HELLOOO! The film is called the PATH to 9/11! And I can tell you this much: the path was not only 8 months long! Do they really think that Muslim terrorism began in late January 2001??


117 posted on 09/09/2006 1:32:07 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
The show has to be at least as accurate as the CBS news story about Bush's Air National Guard service

Touche!

118 posted on 09/09/2006 1:33:12 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
If one's point of view is that it would be a victory for the dhimmicrats to cause the cancellation or cutting of the Path to 9/11 film, then the dhimmicrats have clearly won.

The Clinton's and their apparatchiks have successfully demonstrated how political power can be applied to censor the filmmaker and Disney to edit scenes they didn't like or cancel the film altogether.

Members of the Monica Administration, led by the ex-president screamed indignant about the damage to history.

Liberal professors climbed down from their ivory towers to pontificate on the film's damage to history.

The DNC hijacked the "Path to 9/11"s domain name to Google bomb the Internet.

It appears the clamor worked but there are unintended consequences. The Clinton machine has poked the hornets nest with a stick.

There is now a lot of attention drawn to the issue of Clinton's failures in the 90s. It was Bush's policy, clearly articulated, that those days were behind and they pretty much were.

But now, there is going to be an intense review of exactly what Clinton did or did not do bring Osama and his merry men to justice.

Clinton won the first round on this thing. I bet he goes down in the next couple.
119 posted on 09/09/2006 2:54:11 AM PDT by Beckwith (The dhimmicrats and liberal media have chosen sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
What's funny is the Balsa Wood Liberals declaring total war upon the MSM.

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )

120 posted on 09/09/2006 3:13:06 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson