Democrats urge ABC to withdraw 9/11 movie

Reuters ^ | Richard Cowan and Thomas Ferraro

[redgolum]

Gondor is no more..

But remember, the West came back once before. Perhaps it will again.

[uncbob]

I still can't figure why ABC made this to begin with

They have always been in the Dems bed

[tflabo]

Thats a blast pic Lucky 9 ....Grandma the Mad looks and acts like the Pengy. She was and is AWFUL. You funny....

[Leftism is Mentally Deranged]

The film obviously hurts the leftists who colluded with the islamic fascists to attempt to bring down the USA.
Good reason to record it and watch it over and over.

[Republican Wildcat]

Democrats: "Fact is Fiction; Fiction is Fact"

[Bones75]

"Chronicling events leading to the September 11 attacks, the movie suggests the Clinton administration was too distracted by the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal to deal properly with the gathering threat posed by Islamic militants. "

Gee, YA THINK SO?! (*insert look of shock and amazement*)

[RetSignman]

How do get the masses to see this 'movie'? BAN IT. This is the same tactic they use time and time again and it works. You can bet in the final draft it won't at all hurt 'Bubba' and his co-conspirator's. The MSM and the movie makers will never, ever do anything to tarnish their golden boy.

[PGalt]

Anti-freedom Democrat Crime Syndicate Method of Operation BUMP!

[BenLurkin]

I'm guessing the second half slams the Bush Administration twice as hard.

[goldstategop]

Balsa Wood Liberals

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )

[dr_who_2]

Democrats can be as hysterical as they can be as long as the press overlooks it and the public is preoccupied with other stuff.

[Centurion2000]

So they arent just the treason party any more. Theyve added censorship to their plank as well. Does anyone doubt that these people would set up deathcamps if they had political cover?

Cover? They just need political power and they would do it. Consider the fact that they already support unlimited abortions and embryonic stem cell research.

[BelegStrongbow]

Well, correct me if I'm wrong, but haven't the media trumpeted this whole shebang? From what I have seen and heard, every person in the country now knows that the Clintons and their minions have reacted at being criticized by working overtime to suppress opposing opinions in a movie. And they know this from their newspapers, radio stations, TV stations and Internet outlets (Yahoo on down).

I think this one has not escaped notice, IMHO.

[uncbob]

I'm guessing the second half slams the Bush Administration twice as hard.

If that was true I would think Rush would have mentioned it

[justa-hairyape]

The way the Clinton Team is reacting to this documentary is actually quite similar to how a person guilty of a crime reacts to accusations that they committed a crime. To me this (along with Burglars theft of National Archive documents) demonstrates much more then political posturing. When one examines how Clinton had us fighting in support of the Islamic Terrorist KLA organization, there is a factual foundation for assuming that Clinton aided and abetted Terrorist organizations. The CIA had Bin Laden in their cross hairs on more then one occasion ? Why would Clinton turn down the opportunity to take down a single terrorist, when he could have used just such an action to claim strength in National Security ? Why would Clinton blame the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy and Rush Limbaugh for causing the OKC bombing, when Arab looking men were shown associating with the anarchist McViegh just prior to the bombing ? Why is Hillary so desirous of the White House again ? This may be about much more then just legacy and thin skin. A full investigation into how the Clinton administration aided and abetted Islamic Terrorist prior to 9/11 is warranted IMHO. Why else would they be demanding censorship about a simple documentary ? We really need to examine the parts of this miniseries that the Clinton team is complaining the most about.

Just think of how serious this situation is. We have a President who was soft on terrorism (Bin Laden) and even aided and abetted terrorist (KLA) just prior to the devastating 9/11 attack. After finishing his second term, his hand picked replacement (Gore) refused to concede the election and took the country through 1 month of turmoil. His First Lady then became a US senator for a very powerful state. She has been very desirous of returning to the White House ever since. Is there anyone in Washington who does not see how incredibly dangerous this situation is ?

[justa-hairyape]

Rush claims he has a full unedited copy. On his sign-off today he promised that any changes in plot or context will be reported on by him next week.

Great news. We really need to examine what was censored out by the Clinton Arkansas Mafia. Perhaps he should even send copies of the censored data to the 'proper authorities' for further investigation. After all, we are at war and this material is obviously relevant to that war.

[dr_who_2]

I haven't heard of this business on the radio, but it does appear to be front page news on the foxnews website. The AP story reads like a lightly edited Democrat press release. I don't get a chance to watch television (I wouldn't bother if I did). Maybe you're right. We'll see. But I don't trust ABC or news outlets to do the right thing, much less the Democrats.