Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Growing number of CBS affiliates refusing to carry profanity laden program
American Family Association/Action Alert/Email | Donald E. Wildmon

Posted on 09/06/2006 10:46:23 AM PDT by Iam1ru1-2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 321-330 next last
To: Iam1ru1-2
Earlier I wrote you about the plans by CBS to air "9/11" containing hardcore profanity during primetime viewing (Supreme Court's 'safe-harbour') hours when children are most likely to be watching television. The program is schedule to air this Sunday evening.

What "hardcore profanity?" I saw that when it first aired. There was mild profanity, and the sound of bodies hitting the pavement. I wouldn't recommend it to the squeemish, but it doesn't rate being censored.

241 posted on 09/06/2006 12:35:41 PM PDT by BykrBayb ("We will not be silent. We are your bad conscience. The White Rose will give you no rest." Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

"9/11," which will be shown in prime-time, contains a tremendous amount of hardcore profanity. CBS has stated they have not, and will not, make any cuts in the amount and degree of profanity. CBS will ignore the law. The network is suing the FCC over the indecency law, saying they should be able to show whatever they desire whenever they desire. CBS wants no limits.

This is a test case for CBS to see how far they can go. If there is no out-pouring of complaints from the public, they will go further the next time.


242 posted on 09/06/2006 12:36:26 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
So these guys want US to keep this thing off the air?

If this pinhead thinks that I'm going to help him keep a reminder of the threat to civilization off the air, he can kiss my @$$.

243 posted on 09/06/2006 12:36:40 PM PDT by steve-b ("Creation Science" is to the religous right what "Global Warming" is to the socialist left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Shouldn't you be writing letters now instead of goofing around on a internet forum. Hop to it, bucko.


244 posted on 09/06/2006 12:36:44 PM PDT by RippyO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I wonder how many votes this little stunt is going to cost conservatives come Nov...


245 posted on 09/06/2006 12:36:52 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Want a really good cause?

Get MTV changed to a premium channel that you must pay extra to get.

I'll back you on that one.


246 posted on 09/06/2006 12:37:32 PM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2; Constitution Day; All
And that is an option available to them so that the ENTIRE FAMILY can watch it together and discuss it afterwards.

This program is most assuredly NOT proper for children under the age of about 14 or 15, IMO.

247 posted on 09/06/2006 12:37:37 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

How many times have you seen this documentary, since you "know" it contains a "tremendous amount of hardcore profanity"?

When did you see it? (I think we already know the answer, don't we?)


248 posted on 09/06/2006 12:37:47 PM PDT by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Oh, I have no doubt that the networks would try to get away with as much as possible if elements of their audience didn't take them to task for it. But one of my complaints with this article was that it made the very poor argument that, without restraints, the kids would come from school some day to have CBS serving up porn along with their milk and cookies. That's not going to happen, and everybody knows that it's not going to happen, and it's better not try to make a case by using a silly example.

Again, the writer has little understanding of or appreciation for context. This is a documentary, shot live as the events happened, of a veritable, sudden, unleashing of hell on the people who experienced it. I can accept whatever kind of language they might have used because that's the way people talk, for better or worse, and yes, there is a context in which profanity is appropriate, or at least expected and accepted.

If a 9/11 documentary were to be cleaned up to the extent that it would not violate the sensibilities of its more sensitive viewers, it wouldn't be the language alone that would be cut -- it would be the scenes of planes crashing into buildings, and people jumping out of windows and, people running for their lives from the billows of smoke and ash as the towers collapsed. All the stuff that makes our guts wrench and our hearts sob. All the stuff that reminds us what kind of enemy we face.

The AFA needs to back off on this one.


249 posted on 09/06/2006 12:38:18 PM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican (The moving finger writes and, having writ, moves on......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
Thanks for your link Pyro7480.

CBS To Air Profanity-Laden Program (Complaint About "9/11" Documentary)

250 posted on 09/06/2006 12:38:32 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
And that is an option available to them so that the ENTIRE FAMILY can watch it together and discuss it afterwards.

I see... so you think the ENTIRE FAMILY can sit there and watch 3000 people die a horrific fiery death, just as long as they don't hear a few profanities uttered by those on the scene trying to save those 3000 people? Interesting.

251 posted on 09/06/2006 12:38:37 PM PDT by ecurbh (Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

"CBS will ignore the law. The network is suing the FCC over the indecency law, saying they should be able to show whatever they desire whenever they desire. CBS wants no limits."


___________________________________________________________


This is nothing more than speculation and conjecture. It has no basis in fact.


252 posted on 09/06/2006 12:38:53 PM PDT by txradioguy (In Memory Of My Friend 1SG Tim Millsap A Co. 70th Eng. K.I.A. 25 April 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: durasell

You know that these people don't care about that. The GOP has "disappointed" them in so many ways, I'm sure this just adds to their list.

As people have stated before, we unfortunately have just as many whack jobs on our side as the left does.


253 posted on 09/06/2006 12:38:55 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
AFA will provide you with information for filing a formal complaint with the FCC.

Hmmm... how exactly will they do that? Will it take the form of a paper document that costs them money to print and mail?

If so, I'm interested in seeing it... and so are each of my three cats... and so is the spider in the corner... and....

254 posted on 09/06/2006 12:39:05 PM PDT by steve-b ("Creation Science" is to the religous right what "Global Warming" is to the socialist left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Gingersnap

I'm no fan of vulgarity but if ever there was an appropriate moment to let loose a blue streak, that would have been it.
_____________

I live in MD, and my daughter goes to college in CT. Every time I drive by NYC on my way to visit, 2 words, totally uncensored, come out of my mouth, regardless of who might be traveling with me.

The first word begins with an 'f', and the second word ends with "ards". Was that censored enough? Are you all getting the real sense of my anger?


255 posted on 09/06/2006 12:39:51 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

This is a test case for CBS to see how far they can go. If there is no out-pouring of complaints from the public, they will go further the next time.




It isn't a test. CBS is a business. The network's only job is to get eyeballs on the screen. If they could run a test pattern and get 9 million people to watch, they would. Again, CBS is a for profit business that earns its money by getting people to watch what it broadcasts.


256 posted on 09/06/2006 12:40:09 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
Hell no.

When a plane literally flies into the building you are in, you have the right to say whatever expletives you like - and no impressionable young kids should be watching that live anyway.

Anyone old enough to watch a documentary about 9/11 has already heard the F-word in daily conversation.

257 posted on 09/06/2006 12:41:26 PM PDT by jude24 ("I will oppose the sword if it's not wielded well, because my enemies are men like me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
If so, this is a must-see, profanity or no.

Absolutely agree, and I am also glad that CBS is FINALLY exercising its option to show it a second time (the first showing was in 2002).

After that, the Naudet brothers can get it shown other places.

258 posted on 09/06/2006 12:41:31 PM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003
"How many times have you seen this documentary, since you "know" it contains a "tremendous amount of hardcore profanity"?

When did you see it? (I think we already know the answer, don't we?)

Apparently YOU DIDN'T see it, because it is ladened from front to back with "hardcore" profanity. So now we know that you make comments without even knowing anything about what you're arguing about. How typical of liberals and libertarians.

259 posted on 09/06/2006 12:41:48 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

It's no wonder why we have been experiencing more and more tragedy upon this nation. Many call it the result of "Global Warming", I believe it should be called "Divine Anger".
___________

I get it now. You're a blame America for 911 in the style of Jerry Falwell. 'nuf said.


260 posted on 09/06/2006 12:42:39 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 321-330 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson