Skip to comments.
Schwarzenegger Is Pushing This Republican Into The Undecided Column
FlashReport ^
| 9/4/06
| Matt Cunningham
Posted on 09/04/2006 10:19:40 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280, 281-289 next last
To: tcrlaf
Every time he has tried to hold the line, he has been beaten unmercifully by both the press, and the VOTERS.... Absolute bovine feces. The press celebrated his first act when he borrowed his way out of a cash flow bind with Prop 58. He promised to "cut up the credit cards" and had 60% approval ratings. It was only when it became apparent he had no intention of keeping his promises to control spending that his reputation began to slide. His ballot propositions, supposedly directed toward that end, were proven by the LAO to be hardly such.
261
posted on
09/04/2006 10:46:46 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(Angelides v. Schwarzenegger is like deciding between ebola and cancer, respectively.)
To: Carry_Okie
I don't thinnk its a coincidence as long as he keeps the money tap flowing, the media keeps his approval ratings high. Turn it off, and they turn on him. Live and die by the media. A truth his opponent is belatedly learning for not getting flattering coverage for his campaign.
(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )
262
posted on
09/04/2006 10:57:00 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Carry_Okie
<>> As I recall, he was CRUCIFIED for those proposals by the media, and the unions spending $100 MILLION DOLLARS against them?(!!!) I don't care HOW good you are, if you can't get the message out over the din, you're screwed...
263
posted on
09/04/2006 11:02:06 PM PDT
by
tcrlaf
(VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
To: tcrlaf
As I recall, he was CRUCIFIED for those proposals by the media, and the unions spending $100 MILLION DOLLARS against them?(!!!) You have a short memory. The special election was long after Arnold had already blown his cover and established that he was all about posturing, not substance. The budgets he submittted alienated his base right away. That base saw right through his bogus propositions and didn't fall for them. This is evidenced by the fact that the one proposition that came closest to passage was the one requiring parental notification prior to an abortion. It was also a proposition which Arnold did not include in his campaign.
The mediots attacked Reagan too, and look at the margins by which he was re-elected.
264
posted on
09/04/2006 11:14:18 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(Angelides v. Schwarzenegger is like deciding between ebola and cancer, respectively.)
To: Carry_Okie
Only this time the media is gushing over him. A year ago he was toast. Today, he's back.
(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )
265
posted on
09/04/2006 11:17:12 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
A year ago he was toast. Today, he's back. A year ago he was a RINO. Now he's a socialist.
266
posted on
09/04/2006 11:21:04 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(Angelides v. Schwarzenegger is like deciding between ebola and cancer, respectively.)
To: calcowgirl
There was some good analysis of the Special Election campaign included in the following interview with Arnold Steinberg:
I'm sure Schwarzenegger will say he was briefed on how tough it will be. When he loses, he'll depict himself as a martyr who was pilloried, he'll say something about turnout, who knows what. But no reporters will ever ask the hard questions about how and why this guy's own team destroyed him, and the really hard questions about what their polling showed -- months ago, as well as more recently. It's like Lungren 98 -- everyone will forget that the polling either was entirely incompetent, with absurd voter turnout models, or just plain fraudulent. There was no other explanation back then.
Good, prescient stuff. Thanks, darlin'.
267
posted on
09/05/2006 12:38:33 AM PDT
by
L.N. Smithee
(Angelides vs. Schwarzenegger = Hillary vs. Gore)
To: ChiMark
But not voting is a plus for Angelides which would be far worse than what we have now.......FAR WORSE!
268
posted on
09/05/2006 1:29:19 AM PDT
by
AmeriBrit
( What happened to 'Able Danger'? and which Clinton has all the missing FBI files?)
To: AmeriBrit
Hardly! We ALREADY have socialism imposed on us by the Republican! Is that what our party wants to stand for? By voting for Arnold, we would be confirming for our political opponents that our principles and party platform mean nothing for us and our only care is power. I am reminded of the line in Robert Bolt's screenplay, "A Man For All Seasons," in which more is said to have sarcastically observed, "But what of the world for Wales?" Should we give up cheaply all we hold dear and near? That is where this Republican draws the line.
(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )
269
posted on
09/05/2006 1:42:03 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Lunatic Fringe
California is not just Los Angeles and San Francisco. I live just 80 miles north east of Los Angeles where there is no overcrowding, no polution and we're not overun with mexicans, in fact there are very few here. Come to think of it I haven't seen one lately, not even cutting grass.
BTW: In case you should wonder, this is also a predominately Republican area in the state, so all the rot written here on FR about CA being full of queers, mexicans and Democrats is so wrong. Our main problem is our state government who have found ways with the help of clinton and soros to get the illegals to vote without being challenged .
270
posted on
09/05/2006 1:59:25 AM PDT
by
AmeriBrit
( What happened to 'Able Danger'? and which Clinton has all the missing FBI files?)
To: Amerigomag
Villargarosa [who-dinky] announced his support for Angelides today, according to KFI.
271
posted on
09/05/2006 2:08:11 AM PDT
by
AmeriBrit
( What happened to 'Able Danger'? and which Clinton has all the missing FBI files?)
To: AmeriBrit
It took him until Labor Day to come up an endorsement, eh? Sounds like the Democrats are making a show of rallying behind Angelides but they know privately he's good as gone.
(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )
272
posted on
09/05/2006 2:14:55 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Perhaps if we the voters could get Arnold some help to back him in Sacramento instead of acting like spoiled brats saying "I'm not going to vote", or "I'm going to vote 3rd party" we would see some progress, but as it is now Arnold's a lone survivor on a desert island among a sea of sharks.
273
posted on
09/05/2006 2:27:15 AM PDT
by
AmeriBrit
( What happened to 'Able Danger'? and which Clinton has all the missing FBI files?)
To: goldstategop
Since you admitted it was too much trouble for you to get off your butt and go and vote, I doubt you even read what was on the ballot last November. I doubt though that was the real reason you didn't vote, I'd be more inclined to think it was because you were so prejudiced.
274
posted on
09/05/2006 2:52:04 AM PDT
by
AmeriBrit
( What happened to 'Able Danger'? and which Clinton has all the missing FBI files?)
To: calcowgirl
he could try by earning it--
Since you and your clan are so picky about what others say, how can he earn it if he doesn't get a salary???
275
posted on
09/05/2006 3:38:57 AM PDT
by
AmeriBrit
( What happened to 'Able Danger'? and which Clinton has all the missing FBI files?)
To: AmeriBrit
I'm prejudiced in favor of real change. Flawed propositions and an incompetently run campaign was just a total turn-off.
(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )
276
posted on
09/05/2006 3:44:07 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
no one can fake their IP address. Its a dead giveaway.
I would suggest you do a little research if your capable. What you'd learn might surprise you.
277
posted on
09/05/2006 3:51:56 AM PDT
by
AmeriBrit
( What happened to 'Able Danger'? and which Clinton has all the missing FBI files?)
To: goldstategop
Every time you mention Arnold your Kraut prejudiced attitude flashes like a neon sign. You'd find something to whine about with Arnold even if he was the most conservative republican on the planet just because he's Austrian.
278
posted on
09/05/2006 4:09:53 AM PDT
by
AmeriBrit
( What happened to 'Able Danger'? and which Clinton has all the missing FBI files?)
To: AmeriBrit
And thereby so did Nunez since he's Villar's campaign manager.
To: AmeriBrit
Unfortunately the
lone survivors on the island are legislative Republicans and the Austrian has
always been one of the liberal sharks circling in the legislative shallows, trying to pick off stray conservatives. He's been circling that island since Oct 2003.
Hopefully no offense to the AmeriBrit account , but we're frequently forced to correct revisionists who visit our house. They are victims not perps. They're continuously swamped with misinformation from the CAGOP account.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280, 281-289 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson