Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Men Get Six Months In Jail For Stealing Food From Garbage Can
7 News ^ | September 1, 2006

Posted on 09/02/2006 9:11:47 PM PDT by beaversmom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-196 last
To: AlexandriaDuke

Our society is full of parasites already. We don't need more of them. Those who don't contribute end up sucking off the rest of us.

Maybe you don't work, either, so you sympathize with their laziness.


181 posted on 09/04/2006 11:35:21 AM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
If thousands of hippies can abuse their travel freedom ...

How can an American "abuse" their freedom to travel?

182 posted on 09/04/2006 11:47:13 AM PDT by AlexandriaDuke (Conservatives want freedom. Republicans want power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle
Our society is full of parasites already. We don't need more of them. Those who don't contribute end up sucking off the rest of us.

Maybe you don't work, either, so you sympathize with their laziness.

This language could've come straight off a Stalin or Mao regime billboard. And I'd be facing a trip to the gulag.

183 posted on 09/04/2006 12:04:09 PM PDT by AlexandriaDuke (Conservatives want freedom. Republicans want power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: skaterboy
once it goes in the dumpster u have thrown it away and its not yours anymore....thats my view

That's the view of the US Supreme Court as well. Cops can search through your garbage.

The only thing that might be a stickler is that it was not on the curb but on the property. I don't know if cops can go through your garbage if it is sitting in your back yard - i doubt it as it would be trespassing.

184 posted on 09/04/2006 12:34:41 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta

If it's on public property, it's fair game. On private property, it isn't.


185 posted on 09/04/2006 12:52:31 PM PDT by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Nexus
Thanks for this post!

What's more alarming than the sentence is that the owners didn't want to do anything, but the out of control DA had an agenda. Whose property was it, anyway?
186 posted on 09/04/2006 1:36:32 PM PDT by AlexandriaDuke (Conservatives want freedom. Republicans want power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
How can you not know that breaking into a locked area and taking stuff is wrong?

In my neck of the woods about a third of all business dumpsters are fenced, not because the owners are worried about stealing their trash but because they  are afraid of someone coming along after hours and dumping their trash . 
187 posted on 09/04/2006 2:00:57 PM PDT by grjr21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: AlexandriaDuke
How can an American "abuse" their freedom to travel?

Since you probably haven't read much of the thread, I'll summarize for you...

    - stealing from businesses in the town through which he travels

    - camping with thousands of his friends in an park area not intended for that use, depositing massive amounts of fecal matter

    - defying the legal authority of national park rangers (federal officers), refusing to follow the same legitimate rules that apply to the rest of America

    - committing assault and battery on rangers when displeased with legitimate directives

    - placing an undue strain on the budgets of the park and the local towns and counties for increased services, such as emergency response, all arising from the above

I hope this clarifies things for you.
188 posted on 09/05/2006 11:35:08 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: dasboot
"The 'apparatus' thing is a stretch."

Not at all.

Definition of apparatus extends to any device with a specific purpose, eg. a locked door.

The circumstances of the crime not only justify a charge of 3rd degree burglary as in my post 133 but the more serious charge of 2nd degree burglary, the offense for which they were rightfully arrested.

189 posted on 09/05/2006 11:50:31 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
In order to function as a 'depository' within the intent of the statute, the deposit must have intrinsic or exchange value. The business undoubtedly PAID to have that particular 'deposit' removed from its property as something having no value...a nuisance, if fact. That some small fraction of the contents of the 'apparatus' was removed harmed no one.

Any judge with a modicum of common sense would roll his eyes before the open court at the presentation of such a specious assertion, and then 'have a chat' with the prosecutor in-chambers.

No cigar.

190 posted on 09/06/2006 2:24:31 AM PDT by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte

I was just quibbling with your choice of words. None of that has anything to do with the right to travel.

Does it bother you that people you don't like can go where they please? I hope not.


191 posted on 09/06/2006 11:30:08 AM PDT by AlexandriaDuke (Conservatives want freedom. Republicans want power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: AlexandriaDuke
"I was just quibbling..."

And doing so quite well. I especially like your skill at setting up a "straw man" argument, ie. changing the word "freedom" to the word "right." The loaded question about my not wanting people I don't like to travel is another nice touch.

192 posted on 09/06/2006 1:41:47 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: dasboot
"...must having intrinsic or exchange value...as something having no value..."

Well, it certainly had "exchange" value for the defendants. They were more than willing to exchange 6 months of their freedom for the unlawfully taken produce.

The crime actually charged was --

    18-4-203. Second degree burglary.

    Statute text

    (1) A person commits second degree burglary, if the person knowingly breaks an entrance into, enters unlawfully in, or remains unlawfully after a lawful or unlawful entry in a building or occupied structure with intent to commit therein a crime against another person or property.

    (2) Second degree burglary is a class 4 felony, but it is a class 3 felony if:

    (a) It is a burglary of a dwelling; or

    (b) It is a burglary, the objective of which is the theft of a controlled substance, as defined in section 12-22-303 (7), C.R.S., lawfully kept within any building or occupied structure.

    History
    Source: L. 71: R&RE, p. 427, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 40-4-203. L. 81: (2) amended, p. 974, § 9, effective July 1; (2)(b) amended, p. 2031, § 44, effective July 14. L. 99: (1) amended, p. 327, § 3, effective July 1

Nothing in the above statute refers to value of the property in question, intrinsic or otherwise. After trespassing on private property and breaking into this business, defendants took unlawful possession of property lawfully possessed by another. That satisfies the elements.

193 posted on 09/06/2006 2:52:19 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte

I referred to you're def of "depository".
Still a stretch.

You win. Yeeesh!!


194 posted on 09/06/2006 7:48:26 PM PDT by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

"And the sign said, Anybody caught dumpster-divin'
Would be locked up tight
So I hopped over the fence and I grabbed me some grub
As if to say, 'What gives you the right
To keep all us hippies fenced outside
Or to keep all the veggies in?'
If Abbie Hoffman was here, he'd tell you to your face
'Man, you're some kinda sinner'
Whoa-oh, sign, sign, everywhere a sign
Blockin' out the scenery, breakin' my mind
Do this, don't do that, can't you read the si-ign?"

Sorry, I just had to. In all seriousness, there are still thousands of hippies roaming the countryside? In 2006? Did I miss something? Is that what Mark Steyn has called, "the aging of the dawn of Aquarius"?


195 posted on 09/06/2006 8:51:17 PM PDT by Burma Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Burma Jones

Very good!


196 posted on 09/07/2006 6:52:34 AM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-196 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson