Skip to comments.
“Burning Up SEALs” - Misuing special-warfare assets.
National Review Online ^
| August 31, 2006
| W. Thomas Smith Jr.
Posted on 08/31/2006 3:35:21 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
1
posted on
08/31/2006 3:35:23 PM PDT
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
Some SEALs have told me that actual operations seem not nearly as tough as their training.... My understanding is that is the whole point of BUD/S!
2
posted on
08/31/2006 3:37:48 PM PDT
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: neverdem
When I was kid living in Coronado I would sometimes see those UDT guys training out on The Strand connecting Coronado to the mainland. I had no idea at the time how much they were suffering. :o)
3
posted on
08/31/2006 3:45:48 PM PDT
by
Dumpster Baby
("Hope somebody finds me before the rats do .....")
To: neverdem
In the Panama invasion in the Bush I administration, they misused Seals in a larger group to take an airport. The task
would have been more suited to a Ranger unit more used to larger groups. The misuse of Special Operations troops is an
old story. Regular officers will use them when available to
augment or replace their regular troops.
To: neverdem
Some snarky elitism in the piece.
I served in a Marine Recon unit [not Force] and trained joint ops with SEALs. They're not all that, esp considering all the funding they get for training. In the water or litoral ops - nothing is better. But on dry land I'd rather have Rangers or Recon.
5
posted on
08/31/2006 3:47:54 PM PDT
by
Fenris6
(3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
To: neverdem
Special Operations warriors are not dispensable assets, says Reserve SEAL Commander Mark Divine, who has been to Iraq several times and was tasked with evaluating the performance of a new Marine Corps special operations force during its developmental stages in 2004And Marines or Army line grunts are? SEALs are special, but they're not THAT special. The JOB is to go in harms way. SEALs don't get the job done sitting back at base camp.
What, Divine doesn't like the fact that he was sent out on a mission with the newly constituted Marine special operations folks? Too damned bad.
I've had the privelage of knowing several "sneaky peaches" (Green Berets), and other special ops types. Each has their own specialties and skill sets. But they were all warriors. If someone doesn't want to be a warrior because they're too busy keeping the books on training costs then they shouldn't be in special ops.
This is such manufactured DBM crap! Of course members of the community bitch about the loss of one of their own, blaming some REMF for "misusing" their talents. It goes with the territority. Suck it up, soldier! Or you can always ring the bell.
6
posted on
08/31/2006 3:53:10 PM PDT
by
Phsstpok
(Often wrong, but never in doubt)
To: neverdem
I have long advocated that MOUNT operations (Urban Terrain) is unique enough of an environment that special units, trained along the lines of the FBI's HRT or a SWAT team, should be created in 12 man teams. They would act as the shock troops for particularly nasty encounters and would bolster the normal house to house operations of a regular infantry unit.
A team of 12 could back up an Infantry BN, a platoon could support a Brigade. Training would be less expensive than the full SF or SEAL training and would be focused on breaching urban defenses, sniper support, command and control etc. Treat them as a separate brigade... like the 10th Mountain... call them the 1st Urban or some such.
I have to agree that using SEALs, Rangers, SF or any other special unit for this specific purpose is a bit out of their scope, and a tad wasteful.
To: Phsstpok
My SIL was telling me that in WW11 her brother a sailor was transfered to the Marines, because he filled a need, even though it was against his wishes. This is more efficient use of our military.
8
posted on
08/31/2006 4:01:35 PM PDT
by
Coldwater Creek
("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
To: Anti-Bubba182
Regular officers will use them when available to augment or replace their regular troops.There's two sides to this story - if SOCOM units do missions, their funding is validated, so there is sometimes a push to include units and personnel who would seem better suited for different missions.
9
posted on
08/31/2006 4:09:30 PM PDT
by
Hoplite
To: Phsstpok
I'm with you on this one. There's a war going on. Can't speak for the SEALS, but Army's special operators are generally used against high value targets. Conventional forces get involved if its in their AO, but they are in a support role.
The Seals ought to be thankful that they have only had 1 KIA in Iraq, the Army's SFOD-D has suffered many more than that.
10
posted on
08/31/2006 4:13:52 PM PDT
by
centurion316
(Democrats - Supporting Al Qaida Worldwide)
To: neverdem
It's a little bit like sending out F-22 pilots on a foot patrol through Baghdad. A tremendous waste and misallocation of assets if you ask me.
11
posted on
08/31/2006 4:19:21 PM PDT
by
LibWhacker
(There are no such things as moderate muslims, only jihadis in a larval stage.)
To: mariabush
"...her brother a sailor was transfered to the Marines, because he filled a need..."Possibly a medic. They used to do that a lot. Maybe they still do.
12
posted on
08/31/2006 4:20:45 PM PDT
by
OldEagle
(May you live long enough to hear the legends of your own adventures.)
To: LibWhacker
Bad analogy. SEALs are trained for sniper support. F-22 pilots rarely know how to clear an M-16.
13
posted on
08/31/2006 4:22:32 PM PDT
by
Fenris6
(3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
To: OldEagle
Nope! Navy medics always serve with Marines.
The same is happening today.
I think that it is a good idea and better use of personnel if they are service interchangeable.
14
posted on
08/31/2006 4:27:05 PM PDT
by
Coldwater Creek
("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
To: neverdem
theyre burning up SEALs.
They're = President Bush and his KGC warfighting strategy. Kinder Gentler Compassionate warfare fails and wastes the bravest of our youth. Making them go door to door instead of wasting the whole neighborhood from the air.
We only have a small portion of our youth courageous enough to volunteer for the military in a time of war. AND that small portion is being misused and being shot up needlessly.
It takes months to years to train our troops. The moslems take 15 minutes and they have one billion recruits.
Instead of using the advantage we now enjoy over islam in military power, we have allowed the enemy to establish the rules of engagement. If an IED blows up our troops, instead of wiping out the entire 'hood, we send more troops on the ground.
15
posted on
08/31/2006 4:29:20 PM PDT
by
TomasUSMC
((FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.))
To: neverdem; All
16
posted on
08/31/2006 4:30:43 PM PDT
by
Fenris6
(3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
To: Fenris6
Right, I only used the analogy to illustrate the absurdity of risking highly valuable assets in duties perhaps better done by less valuable assests. Not saying their lives are inherently more valuable than the life of a grunt -- they're not -- but as military assests they are more valuable. You wouldn't use an aircraft carrier as a mine sweeper or a pilot as a grunt (even if he knew how to shoot).
17
posted on
08/31/2006 4:31:43 PM PDT
by
LibWhacker
(There are no such things as moderate muslims, only jihadis in a larval stage.)
To: LibWhacker
18
posted on
08/31/2006 4:33:08 PM PDT
by
LibWhacker
(There are no such things as moderate muslims, only jihadis in a larval stage.)
To: neverdem
"Lee was the first SEAL to die in Iraq"
How many have we lost?
19
posted on
08/31/2006 4:37:41 PM PDT
by
james500
To: namsman
20
posted on
08/31/2006 4:37:50 PM PDT
by
SW6906
(6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson