Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More4 risks US ire with Bush assassination film
The Guardian ^ | August 31, 2006 | Jason Deans

Posted on 08/31/2006 5:47:02 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-280 next last
To: antiRepublicrat
Maybe there should be a sequel to the film. One where a whole country is killed for being the launching pad for a plot that kills the US President. One where the USA sends in agents and poisons all the fresh water and blows up desalination plants. Lets show there are prices to be paid for all actions.
161 posted on 08/31/2006 10:42:53 AM PDT by sportsterinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: 0siris

"Force Democrats to either renounce its demented leftwing base or defend it, either way, self destruction."

It's a British film, made by British filmmakers. Why should American political parties have to take a stand on it?


162 posted on 08/31/2006 10:43:12 AM PDT by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003

Thanks for the correction. I was too lazy to look it up, and just took a stab at it.


163 posted on 08/31/2006 10:45:54 AM PDT by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2

It's wonderful stuff. Chicago's being stupid (but then, it's not the first time).


164 posted on 08/31/2006 10:46:53 AM PDT by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah
They think they that one can say anything without consequence. But the standard of limiting free speech remains the same: one does not cry "fire" in a crowded theatre. Is there any doubt that both Kennedy brothers and King were killed because they were hated--and feared. JFK was hated by both right and left; RFK, hated by Arabs more than he knew by for his support of Israel. We know who killed King.
165 posted on 08/31/2006 10:51:15 AM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sportsterinred
I dont say anything about it.

Then you shouldn't say anything about this film.

166 posted on 08/31/2006 10:57:46 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

Oh, I thought "this film" was the topic of discussion. My mistake.


167 posted on 08/31/2006 11:00:33 AM PDT by sportsterinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Icthus
It's almost like they are blinded by hate.

There, fixed it. ;^)

168 posted on 08/31/2006 11:02:39 AM PDT by top 2 toe red (To the enemy in Iraq..."Don't bet on American politics forcing my hand!" President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
But if they want to show it in the US, they may meet some nice young men with sunglasses and earpieces.

Lol...Yep, I think they will definitely meet up with these nice young men in black!

169 posted on 08/31/2006 11:06:28 AM PDT by top 2 toe red (To the enemy in Iraq..."Don't bet on American politics forcing my hand!" President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko

Oh, I'd pay to see that...in fact, I'd probably pay to see several times to just make sure I didn't miss any of my "favorites" being offed.


170 posted on 08/31/2006 11:09:39 AM PDT by top 2 toe red (To the enemy in Iraq..."Don't bet on American politics forcing my hand!" President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sportsterinred

I think his point was, why are you outraged by this and not the Clancy example? Especially since you know nothing about this film except what the article says (and it's apparent most people here haven't read the article, either).


171 posted on 08/31/2006 11:28:22 AM PDT by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: sportsterinred
Oh, I thought "this film" was the topic of discussion.

You had an objection that this film depicted the assassination of a U.S. President, and the manner in which it was done. I merely pointed out that Tom Clancy had done the same, and even worse. You can't really object to one and not the other on those grounds.

172 posted on 08/31/2006 11:36:44 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: lakeman; prairiebreeze
maybe we could call that movie "Independence Day"

...or "Paradise Found."

173 posted on 08/31/2006 11:39:57 AM PDT by top 2 toe red (To the enemy in Iraq..."Don't bet on American politics forcing my hand!" President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
Tom Clancy didn't 'name' his assassinated president, George W Bush...BIG DIFFERENCE.
174 posted on 08/31/2006 11:50:21 AM PDT by top 2 toe red (To the enemy in Iraq..."Don't bet on American politics forcing my hand!" President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
"I think we may actually need to wait to see what the film is really about, even though I suspect it is a hit piece, as it may be quite different then our initial reaction would reasonably assume given the track record of these types."

Muslims will make more noise about being offended by this film, I guarantee it.

(assuming the Syrian is Muslim)

175 posted on 08/31/2006 11:54:10 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 0siris
"There should be a museum dedicated to Leftwing idiocy. An actual, walk in museum, where you can bring your high school age kids. It would document via paintings, TV replays, giant sized pictures, the various insults and insinuations the Left has hurled at non-leftists (particularly in recent years--the Moveon ads, the "Unterfuhrer" comments, the "protest" pictures of signs with the Star of David crossed with a Swatstika, ect.--and compare what Republicans stand for and have accomplished, with what the Nazis stood for and accomplished."

I am in love with this idea!

176 posted on 08/31/2006 11:56:16 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

Comment #177 Removed by Moderator

To: antiRepublicrat
I doubt you'll even hear President Bush say it should be stopped, and this is a president who previously said criticism of him should not be allowed, and who has tried to silence criticism.

Bullsh*t. President Bush has neither said criticism of him should not be allowed, nor has he tried to silence criticism of him. Jesus Christ, are you sure you aren't thinking of wannabe Prez Kerry who tried to shut down the Swifties and ban their book?

178 posted on 08/31/2006 12:13:15 PM PDT by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: vrwcagent0498

I left Kate a comment. We'll see if they'll post it.


179 posted on 08/31/2006 12:14:57 PM PDT by Sender (“Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
Joe Klein admitted several years back that he wrote "Primary Colors"

Yes he did, eventually, but not until it was yesterday's story.

180 posted on 08/31/2006 12:20:59 PM PDT by Churchillspirit (We are all foot soldiers in this War On Terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-280 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson