Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Earth's formerly thin ozone layer is recovering
Reuters ^ | August 30, 2006

Posted on 08/30/2006 7:48:40 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: Clintonfatigued
Earth's formerly thin ozone layer is recovering

The New York Times is deeply saddened

21 posted on 08/30/2006 8:25:26 PM PDT by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lmr

Another theory is "change" via improved technology over many decades...

First measure something with a tree limb. Then use a ruler to increase precision. Then combine all the data, and claim that what you measured has changed over time.


22 posted on 08/30/2006 8:26:36 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Does this mean we will be able to buy R-12 referigerant again, oh I forgot, Du Pont's pattent ran out so it was outlawed.


23 posted on 08/30/2006 8:39:58 PM PDT by c-b 1 (Reporting from behind enemy lines, in occupied AZTLAN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
First measure something with a tree limb. Then use a ruler to increase precision. Then combine all the data, and claim that what you measured has changed over time.

Fascinating, I'm being serious here.

Can you please explain to me what has changed and to what period of time are you referring to?
24 posted on 08/30/2006 8:40:13 PM PDT by lmr ("The answers to life don't involve complex solutions." -Del Riley 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Earth's protective ozone layer, which was notably thinning in 1980, may be fully recovered by mid-century, climate scientists said on Wednesday...don't tell the globalwarmists - it'll ruin their day......
25 posted on 08/30/2006 8:44:03 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lmr

I am merely assuming that over many years, NASA's equipment (satellites and other systems) has improved, largely due to processing power but more generally their overall methods and tech capabilities.

A good and honest scientist would naturally take this into account, so I am further wondering whether they didn't.

No examples. Just a guess.


26 posted on 08/30/2006 8:49:44 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Lets put all this together - the half-life of CFCs is dozens of years. Many countries but not all stopped using the bad CFCs about 8 years ago. There is still lots of CFCs in the upper atmosphere. The ozone hole is closing up.

Hmmmmm.....

Correlation is not causation - but this is lost on the ecotwits.

27 posted on 08/30/2006 8:51:25 PM PDT by corkoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Ozone is produced when oxygen is exposed to 235-320 nm of ultra violet light from the sun.
It has a half life of only 15 minutes. At longer wavelengths it is broken down.
The spectral emissions of the sun combined with the deflection caused by the earth magnetic poles controls
the production of ozone.
Chicken little strikes again.
28 posted on 08/30/2006 9:39:33 PM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r-q-tek86
I'm tellin' the wife! Oral sex saves the ozone layer!

But only if performed by a somewhat Reubenesque young lady not your wife.

Maybe you'd best *not* tell the wife. :)

29 posted on 08/30/2006 9:40:14 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: corkoman

How long had CFCs been in use prior to the Montreal Protocol? My guess would be since the 1950s and probably earlier (I'm picturing 1950s cars with air conditioners and women hairspraying their beehive hairdos -- or maybe that was more like the 1960s. Anyway...).

According to the article, scientists noticed the ozone laye thinning in 1980. The Montreal Protocol was put in place in 1987. And by 1997 the thinning had stopped.

So that's the effect of thirty-something years (1950 to 1987) worth of CFC accumulation in the atmosphere being reversed in 10 years (1987 to 1997). And this assumes that CFC production came to an abrupt end in 1987 -- which, as you say, wasn't the case at all. Throw in the decades-long half life of CFCs, and it seems unlikely that the ozone could've turned the corner in a mere 10 years.


30 posted on 08/30/2006 9:59:49 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

So with all the cut-back in greenhouse gasses and the ozone hole repairing itself, we should be in an all out ice age in about 75 years.


31 posted on 08/30/2006 10:04:18 PM PDT by Delta 21 ( MKC USCG - ret)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick
Notice the correlation to "Global Warming".
It's all in the spectral emission of the sun.

Ps. for years I designed high frequency inverters and ozone generators. ROTFLMAO!
32 posted on 08/30/2006 10:14:32 PM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Bulldaddy

"Algore, of course, was prominently featured lecturing us all in his condescending Algore way."



And you were able to stay awake?


33 posted on 08/30/2006 10:43:40 PM PDT by FarRightFanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick
"And this assumes that CFC production came to an abrupt end in 1987"


34 posted on 08/30/2006 10:45:34 PM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

"No examples. Just a guess."

Well- they keep measuring Mt. Everest and it keeps shrinking (or growing).


35 posted on 08/30/2006 10:48:45 PM PDT by geopyg (If the carrot doesn't work, use the stick. Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Now radiation charges from changes in the spectral emission of the sun couldn't be doing that!

36 posted on 08/30/2006 11:07:25 PM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

37 posted on 08/30/2006 11:11:33 PM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

for later


38 posted on 08/30/2006 11:36:22 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bellflower


ping


39 posted on 08/31/2006 2:30:29 AM PDT by Bittersweetmd (God is Great and greatly to be praised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lmr; Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit

Since CFC molecules are just TOO HEAVY to float up to the edge of the stratosphere where O2 molecules absorb ultraviolet waves to become chemically unstable O3 molecules, the "Ozone Depletion Theory" has always been junk science -- "Nobel Prize", notwithstanding. Political Correctness has not (yet) repealed the Law of Gravity.

Therefore, a REAL increase in the number of O3 molecules at the edge of the stratospere, as determined by REAL atmosperic sampling (rather than as "determined" by printouts from error-prone computer models) would tend to indicate a recent increase in solar radiation.

I wonder, is there any evidence that such an increase in solar radiation has occured? I mean other than the over-reported warming of the Earth's surface and the under-reported melting of the ice-caps on Mars?

Let me research that....




40 posted on 08/31/2006 6:26:21 AM PDT by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson