Conflict of Interest Is Raised in N.S.A. Ruling

NY Times' Terrorist Tip Sheet ^ | August 23, 2006 | ERIC LICHTBLAU (Terrorist Tipper)

[right-wingin_It]

Yikes..are those painted clown eyebrows??

[Chode]

BIG COURT STRIKES AGAIN!!!

[Prokopton]

"The group, Judicial Watch...
and their involvement ensure that this story will die a quick, painless death."



If it wasn't for Judicial watch you wouldn't be reading about this now. If a FReeper would have discovered this conflict you would be celebrating them now as a hero. Give credit where credit is due.

[Edgerunner]

Memorialized in song
Immortalized in song!

[massgopguy]

Well, it seems that this hack judge's husband was a corrupt congressman who did time for shaking down constituents.

[mo]

Can any legal eagles define a conspiracy between this judge and the ACLU to deprive American citizens otheir right to self-defense....

[Libertarian444]

I see JW is back to being called a "conservative" group. Too funny.

http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2002/cyb20020711.asp#1

When Judicial Watch was suing Clinton administration officials the networks, on the rare occasions when they deigned to even mention the group, made sure viewers realized it was “conservative.” But when the organization run by Larry Klayman filed a lawsuit on Wednesday against Vice President Dick Cheney, it suddenly became a non-ideological “watchdog group,” “Washington watchdog group,” “legal group,” “legal activist group” or “legal advocacy group.”

[Redbob]

"Three legal ethicists interviewed said although Judge Taylor’s role as a trustee for a supporter of the civil liberties group would not necessarily disqualify her from hearing the case, she should have probably disclosed the connection in court to avoid any appearance of a conflict."

One

Two

Three:
No Shit Sherlock!