Skip to comments.
NSA Judge Anna Diggs Taylor Secretary of Fund that bankrolled Michigan ACLU
Judicial Watch ^
| 8/21/06
| Judicial Watch
Posted on 08/22/2006 8:06:06 PM PDT by motife
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
1
posted on
08/22/2006 8:06:09 PM PDT
by
motife
To: motife
2
posted on
08/22/2006 8:07:53 PM PDT
by
budanski
To: motife
3
posted on
08/22/2006 8:10:04 PM PDT
by
budanski
To: motife
Of course it is a conflict of interest. She should be impeached.
4
posted on
08/22/2006 8:11:59 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: motife
Of course she didn't disclose her affiliations or the Government lawyers would have filed a motion to have her removed.
5
posted on
08/22/2006 8:12:13 PM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: motife
DON'T ANYBODY SEND A PENNY TO TOM FITTON
6
posted on
08/22/2006 8:12:37 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: motife
The ACLU didnt go Judge shopping. Anna Diggs-Taylor did the shopping, She had already made a decision all she needed was someone to bring forth the suit. She needs to be impeached.
7
posted on
08/22/2006 8:13:18 PM PDT
by
sgtbono2002
(The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
To: motife
CFSEM Secretary/ trustee Taylor Diggs probably sent a note with that $45,000 to the Michigan ACLU.
Dear ACLU -
Here's $45,000 to fight Bush's Terrorist Surveillance program.
Yours truly, and your always welcome in my court
- Justice Taylor Diggs
..... XoX
8
posted on
08/22/2006 8:13:25 PM PDT
by
TeleStraightShooter
(The Right To Take Life is NOT a Constitutional "Liberty" protected by the 14th Amendment)
To: motife
Judicial ethics do not just prohibit impropriety
The prohibit any appearance of impropriety.
Clearly, she should have recused herself. Absent judicial notification, at the time of case assignment, to both sides of her prior associations, it is clearly open for a nul verdict and remand.
9
posted on
08/22/2006 8:15:17 PM PDT
by
MindBender26
(Having my own CAR-15 in RVN meant never having to say I was sorry....)
To: sgtbono2002
concur - there is a small chance of it succeeding, however, it would illustrate to the voters how the (D) senators support her unethical actions.
10
posted on
08/22/2006 8:17:00 PM PDT
by
TeleStraightShooter
(The Right To Take Life is NOT a Constitutional "Liberty" protected by the 14th Amendment)
To: motife
.S. District Judge Who Presided Over Government Wiretapping Case May Have Had Conflict of Interest MAY??? MAY??? I would dare say this is definitely a conflict of interest
11
posted on
08/22/2006 8:20:31 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(flogerloon.blogspot.com -------------> Rise of the Hate Party)
To: MindBender26
Why should she recuse herself? The rules never apply to the ACLU and their cohorts. I am surprised that you did not know this. ;)
To: TeleStraightShooter
how much will cnn push this NONE
To: motife
This Commie [female dog] should be hung out to try. God Bless Judicial Watch!!!!
14
posted on
08/22/2006 8:24:35 PM PDT
by
EagleUSA
To: motife
15
posted on
08/22/2006 8:25:28 PM PDT
by
DCPatriot
("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
To: doug from upland
No one will have the B***s to do it.
16
posted on
08/22/2006 8:27:25 PM PDT
by
Springman
(9-11-06, what will happen?)
To: mockingbyrd
These are the type of cases where you go screaming "per valde volo quod Boom Box" (Latin (?) for "with great speed and volume") to the "Wise Men" (appeals court) for immediate relief.
17
posted on
08/22/2006 8:27:50 PM PDT
by
MindBender26
(Having my own CAR-15 in RVN meant never having to say I was sorry....)
To: motife
Judges are simply human beings, not gods. They are as political and corrupted as other politicians. When will we have a president who has the nerve to tell a judge you are unelected, a human being, and if you want to enforce your ruling go do it but I do not agree and will not support your ruling. Andrew Jackson did and has been known favorably ever since because of it. I repeat. No judge or judicial court is god no matter what they think.
To: MindBender26
"quod Boom Box"
Must have missed that during Latin class.
I am concerned that this will be overturned only on technicalities now, instead of addressing the true legal issues.
To: motife
If Judge Diggs Taylor failed to disclose this link to a plaintiff in a case before her court, it would certainly call into question her judgment.The text of the ruling itself calls into question the competence and judgement of the affirmative-action appointment, judge Diggs-Taylor.
20
posted on
08/22/2006 8:48:47 PM PDT
by
Nomorjer Kinov
(If the opposite of "pro" is "con" , what is the opposite of progress?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson