Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NSA Judge Anna Diggs Taylor Secretary of Fund that bankrolled Michigan ACLU
Judicial Watch ^ | 8/21/06 | Judicial Watch

Posted on 08/22/2006 8:06:06 PM PDT by motife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 08/22/2006 8:06:09 PM PDT by motife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: motife

Gateway Pundit's Website... http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2006/08/judge-anna-diggs-taylors-dirty.html


2 posted on 08/22/2006 8:07:53 PM PDT by budanski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: motife

Gateway Pundit's take... http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2006/08/judge-anna-diggs-taylors-dirty.html


3 posted on 08/22/2006 8:10:04 PM PDT by budanski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: motife

Of course it is a conflict of interest. She should be impeached.


4 posted on 08/22/2006 8:11:59 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: motife

Of course she didn't disclose her affiliations or the Government lawyers would have filed a motion to have her removed.


5 posted on 08/22/2006 8:12:13 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: motife
DON'T ANYBODY SEND A PENNY TO TOM FITTON
6 posted on 08/22/2006 8:12:37 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: motife

The ACLU didnt go Judge shopping. Anna Diggs-Taylor did the shopping, She had already made a decision all she needed was someone to bring forth the suit. She needs to be impeached.


7 posted on 08/22/2006 8:13:18 PM PDT by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: motife
CFSEM Secretary/ trustee Taylor Diggs probably sent a note with that $45,000 to the Michigan ACLU.


Dear ACLU -
Here's $45,000 to fight Bush's Terrorist Surveillance program.


Yours truly, and your always welcome in my court
- Justice Taylor Diggs
..... XoX
8 posted on 08/22/2006 8:13:25 PM PDT by TeleStraightShooter (The Right To Take Life is NOT a Constitutional "Liberty" protected by the 14th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: motife
Judicial ethics do not just prohibit impropriety

The prohibit any appearance of impropriety.

Clearly, she should have recused herself. Absent judicial notification, at the time of case assignment, to both sides of her prior associations, it is clearly open for a nul verdict and remand.

9 posted on 08/22/2006 8:15:17 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 in RVN meant never having to say I was sorry....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
concur - there is a small chance of it succeeding, however, it would illustrate to the voters how the (D) senators support her unethical actions.
10 posted on 08/22/2006 8:17:00 PM PDT by TeleStraightShooter (The Right To Take Life is NOT a Constitutional "Liberty" protected by the 14th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: motife
.S. District Judge Who Presided Over Government Wiretapping Case May Have Had Conflict of Interest

MAY??? MAY??? I would dare say this is definitely a conflict of interest

11 posted on 08/22/2006 8:20:31 PM PDT by GeronL (flogerloon.blogspot.com -------------> Rise of the Hate Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Why should she recuse herself? The rules never apply to the ACLU and their cohorts. I am surprised that you did not know this. ;)


12 posted on 08/22/2006 8:21:32 PM PDT by mockingbyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TeleStraightShooter

how much will cnn push this NONE


13 posted on 08/22/2006 8:21:36 PM PDT by stickandpucknut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: motife

This Commie [female dog] should be hung out to try. God Bless Judicial Watch!!!!


14 posted on 08/22/2006 8:24:35 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: motife

Pretty cool.


15 posted on 08/22/2006 8:25:28 PM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

No one will have the B***s to do it.


16 posted on 08/22/2006 8:27:25 PM PDT by Springman (9-11-06, what will happen?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mockingbyrd
These are the type of cases where you go screaming "per valde volo quod Boom Box" (Latin (?) for "with great speed and volume") to the "Wise Men" (appeals court) for immediate relief.
17 posted on 08/22/2006 8:27:50 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 in RVN meant never having to say I was sorry....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: motife

Judges are simply human beings, not gods. They are as political and corrupted as other politicians. When will we have a president who has the nerve to tell a judge you are unelected, a human being, and if you want to enforce your ruling go do it but I do not agree and will not support your ruling. Andrew Jackson did and has been known favorably ever since because of it. I repeat. No judge or judicial court is god no matter what they think.


18 posted on 08/22/2006 8:38:29 PM PDT by georgiarat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
"quod Boom Box"

Must have missed that during Latin class.

I am concerned that this will be overturned only on technicalities now, instead of addressing the true legal issues.
19 posted on 08/22/2006 8:40:53 PM PDT by mockingbyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: motife
“If Judge Diggs Taylor failed to disclose this link to a plaintiff in a case before her court, it would certainly call into question her judgment.”

The text of the ruling itself calls into question the competence and judgement of the affirmative-action appointment, judge Diggs-Taylor.

20 posted on 08/22/2006 8:48:47 PM PDT by Nomorjer Kinov (If the opposite of "pro" is "con" , what is the opposite of progress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson