Skip to comments.
Reclusive genius shuns top maths award [Can't make a sphere out of a donut--$1 million]
Scotsman ^
| 8-22-06
Posted on 08/22/2006 7:48:41 PM PDT by SJackson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
The Poincaré conjecture essentially says that in three dimensions you cannot transform a doughnut shape into a sphere without ripping it, although any shape without a hole can be stretched or shrunk into a sphere.
I knew that. Everyone likes donuts
1
posted on
08/22/2006 7:48:44 PM PDT
by
SJackson
To: SJackson
Just goes to show there are some very "unique" people in this world that can do things and visualize things and certainly process things much differently than 99.999% of the rest of us.
The article itself had me spinning. Would have liked to see an American in that list of winners, too.
To: SJackson
MMMMM, Doughnuts!!
3
posted on
08/22/2006 8:01:06 PM PDT
by
phoenix0468
(http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
To: Chicos_Bail_Bonds
I admit putting it in terms of donuts, spheres and balls didn't help much.
4
posted on
08/22/2006 8:01:53 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do!)
To: SJackson
You know, that's pretty easy to see. Since a doughnut has the hole, it makes it impossible to bend it into the shape of a shpere. But to explain that mathematically for me would be impossible.
5
posted on
08/22/2006 8:04:51 PM PDT
by
phoenix0468
(http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
To: phoenix0468
You know, that's pretty easy to see. Since a doughnut has the hole, it makes it impossible to bend it into the shape of a shpere. But to explain that mathematically for me would be impossible. Mathematically, that's the trick
Common sense, before cooking, compress the donut between both hands, roll it about, toss it in oil, you've got a beignet.
$1,000,000 please.
6
posted on
08/22/2006 8:11:06 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do!)
To: SJackson
Nope, you've basically torn the doghnut, since you have removed a portion of it's surface area. Where with a cube or oblong you wouldn't have to do that. HAHA, anyway he said I could have the dough, hehe.
7
posted on
08/22/2006 8:21:24 PM PDT
by
phoenix0468
(http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
To: SJackson
well, a stereotypical recluse... more gist for Hollywood.
International Mathematical Union
Darn can't believe I missed that.... make plans for next one /sarcasm
8
posted on
08/22/2006 8:24:15 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(flogerloon.blogspot.com -------------> Rise of the Hate Party)
To: SJackson
Perhaps he is out in the woods of Russia writing his manifesto. ;-)
9
posted on
08/22/2006 8:26:04 PM PDT
by
glorgau
To: SJackson
funniest post of the day!
10
posted on
08/22/2006 8:29:37 PM PDT
by
1955Ford
To: SJackson
Perhaps the trick is to collapse the inside of the donut forming a 2-dimensional ring with 2 sides.
Now begin stretching the ring into a ball (with 2 holes at the artics) so that 1 side of the ring now becomes the inside of the sphere and the other side of the ring now becomes the outer surface of the sphere, and 2 holes are at either end, which can then be stretched closed.
Both surfaces of the new sphere (inner and outer) are formed from just the one outer surface of the donut. The inner surface of the donut is now essentially sandwiched between the inner and outer surfaces of the sphere.
I'm sure that was not the problem they were trying to solve.
(?)
11
posted on
08/22/2006 8:29:38 PM PDT
by
Mark Felton
("Your faith should not be in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God.")
To: Mark Felton
By stretching the ring (looks like a frisbee with a hole in the middle) into a sphere what is required is that all points around the inner circle be connected with their opposing point at the other end of the diamter.
The points all around the outer rim are joined to their opposing points, creating the seam of the sphere.
No rips, no tears, only a lost surface, and a new surface creqted from the divison of the old outer surface into an inner and outer.
12
posted on
08/22/2006 8:34:50 PM PDT
by
Mark Felton
("Your faith should not be in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God.")
To: Chicos_Bail_Bonds
In an age of a severely dumbed down math curriculum in our public schools, I fear only private or home schooled individuals will ever qualify for such an award. Mathematics is a dying art in our colleges and universities. Most freshman struggle to add and subtract fractions with uncommon denominators.!!!
13
posted on
08/22/2006 8:38:10 PM PDT
by
Englishman
(I came here legally)
To: SJackson
The Brits say "maths", we say "math".
The Brits say "sport", we say "sports".
Why?
To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
Because we drive on the parkway and park on the driveway.
15
posted on
08/22/2006 8:46:18 PM PDT
by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com)
To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
Yeah well the Brits also smoke fags. Here we just watch them parade down the street once or twice a year. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
16
posted on
08/22/2006 8:48:04 PM PDT
by
phoenix0468
(http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
To: SJackson
Cincinnatus the mathematician. :)
To: Englishman
Math ability has little to do with schooling, home-based or otherwise. If you don't have it, you can't learn it, at least at the level of first-rate academic research. If you do have it, it can be encouraged, but I am afraid that it is unlikely that home-schooling parents will know how to encourage real math ability. The best thing is for a gifted child to meet other gifted children led by someone with real mathematical talent, and that is more likely to happen in a school than at home.
18
posted on
08/22/2006 9:10:55 PM PDT
by
maro
To: maro
If you do have it, it can be encouraged, but I am afraid that it is unlikely that home-schooling parents will know how to encourage real math ability. The best thing is for a gifted child to meet other gifted children led by someone with real mathematical talent, and that is more likely to happen in a school than at home.
Very true. There are some that think that homeschooling can accomplish everything, but the fact remains that the majority of the primary homeschooling parents have less education than a credentialed teacher. (I know, I know - most teachers these days aren't worth the paper their degree is on, but the standard of having a degree in what they teach is good in theory.) I personally don't see how anyone can competently teach all subjects at the senior level. (Assuming the senior level is what it used to be).
Sir Isaac Newton, my favorite mathematician and physicist, was considered idle and inattentive at school until a headmaster saw the potential in him and encouraged him to study. Newton later developed the calculus foundation of differentiation and integration in order to complete his work on the laws of motion. I would've loved to see his former teachers' faces when they heard what their 'idle and inattentive' student achieved. Much more than they ever did.
To: phoenix0468
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson