Not when al-Bush hold this guy's hand and chants "Islam is a religion of peace."
And let's not forget
Controversial Muslim Group (CAIR) gets VIP Airport Security Tour (DSH shows all)
Posted on 08/20/2006 2:40:27 AM PDT by goldstategop
(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo!)
Not when al-Bush hold this guy's hand and chants "Islam is a religion of peace."
And let's not forget
Controversial Muslim Group (CAIR) gets VIP Airport Security Tour (DSH shows all)
God, however, is still sovereign, and world events will take place under His command.
Iraq and Afghanistan were tremendous military victories, and they served His purpose. If one believes in the Almighty, one does not have be afraid. What is happening today in Iran and Syria will also be dealt with in His perfect timing.
We can wring our hands and sob, but I choose to smile and to be confident that the pagan Democrats and the evil Muslims don't yet know that God (the real one) cannot be kicked off His throne.
Wait on the Lord. He will be victorious.
Bush has much to answer for.
Explain why Bush
1. Calls Islam a religion of peace.
2. Embraces (and more) Islamic thugs.
3. Has the Dep't of Homeland Security give behind-the-scenes airport security tours to a Muslim organization with a lengthy history of terrorist ties.
4. Sold Israel down the river to the Hezzies with the UN Security Council
I don't hate Bush. After voting for him twice, I'm profoundly disappointed that he's auditioning for a place in history somewhere between his "no new taxes" dad and Jimmy "killer rabbit" Carter.
Man, get over it. You sound like those libs who think we should just stop buying oil.
He held a feeble old goat's hand on the way to a meeting--wow, he's a traitor! ]
Cram the "al-Bush" stuff. You Libertarian types are a cancer on the body politic.
When Bush starts defending America's interests, instead of the Saudis and the Mexicans, I'll consider respecting the man as a person. I respect the office. He's not fit to serve in it. The straw that broke the camel's back was this FR Post.
If a Dim prez did this, we'd be calling for impeachment.
Controversial Muslim Group (CAIR) gets VIP Airport Security Tour (DSH shows all)
WorldNetDaily ^ | 08/18/06 | n/a
Posted on 08/18/2006 3:09:02 PM PDT by mojito
The Department of Homeland Security took a Muslim group with known past ties to terror organizations on a VIP tour of security operations at the nation's busiest airport at the same time British authorities were working to break up a plot to blow up U.S. airlines.
On June 21, a senior DHS official from Washington personally guided Muslim officials from the Council on American-Islamic Relations on a behind-the-scenes tour of Customs screening operations at O'Hare International Airport in response to CAIR complaints that Muslim travelers were being unfairly delayed as they entered the U.S. from abroad.
CAIR is a spin-off of the Islamic Association for Palestine, identified by two former FBI counterterrorism chiefs as a "front group" for the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas. Several CAIR leaders have been convicted on terror-related charges.
During the airport tour, CAIR was taken on a walk through the point-of-entry, Customs stations, secondary screening and interview rooms. In addition, U.S. Customs and Border Patrol agents were asked to describe for CAIR representatives various features of the high-risk passenger lookout system.
In a meeting, Brian Humphrey, Customs and Border Patrol's executive director of field operations, assured CAIR officials that agents do not single out Muslim passengers for special screening and that they must undergo a mandatory course in Muslim sensitivity training. The course teaches agents that Muslims believe jihad is an "internal struggle against sin" and not holy warfare.
Customs agents involved in the CAIR tour at O'Hare tell WorldNetDaily they were outraged that headquarters would reveal sensitive counterterrorism procedures to an organization that has seen several of its own officials convicted of terror-related charges since 9-11.
"Isn't that nice of CBP," one agent said, to provide a "group like CAIR with a guided, behind-the-scenes tour of our customs facilities, explaining how programs designed to catch Muslim terrorists work."
CAIR says the tour allayed its concerns about profiling and that it "looks forward to continuing the relationship with U.S. Customs and Border Protection offices in the region, and to furthering understanding between the organizations as well as facilitating future communication in order to eliminate problems for Muslim travelers before they even arise."
The Muslim-sensitivity training course at O'Hare is taught by Margaret Nydell, an Arabic professor at Georgetown University, home to a large Saudi-financed center on Islamic studies.
A Customs and Border Protection supervisor described Nydell's instruction, along with CBP's companion training manual and video, as "politically correct drivel."
"It's all about how Islam means peace and tolerance," he told WorldNetDaily. "We're told how to deal with Arabs and Muslims, that they are loving people and not terrorists. That jihad is struggle with sin and has nothing to do with violence."
The Department of Homeland Security invites CAIR itself to conduct sensitivity training for Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and supervisors (CBP's counterparts) in Chicago. The course is taught by local CAIR officials Christina Abraham and Mariyam Hussain. More than 30 ICE staffers have gone through the CAIR awareness program so far.
CAIR – which is bankrolled by the Saudis and the United Arab Emirates, two countries that formally recognized the Taliban – also offers religious and cultural sensitivity training about Islam and Muslims to the military. In June, for example, CAIR trained more than 300 military personnel at the Marine Corps Air Station in Yuma, Ariz.
Also in June, CAIR was invited by the Pentagon to a ceremony dedicating the first Islamic center in Marine Corps history at Quantico headquarters outside of Washington. Washington-based CAIR also has regular meetings with the FBI and Justice Department. In fact, FBI case agents complain the bureau rarely can make a move in the Muslim community without first consulting with CAIR, which sits on its advisory board. CAIR in the past has cried racism and bigotry when the bureau has moved unilaterally with investigations and raids in the community.
When the democrats set out to defeat President Bush by opposing the Iraq war, they divided the nation without regard to the effects of defeat.
Why do the Democrats historically work for the defeat of America on all fronts?
I understand you believe a Democrat taking the White House would be a good thing, as you've posted, but do either of these things come within light years of the daily treason of the DUmmies? No, they don't, hysteria over photo ops notwithstanding.
You obviously enjoy calling Bush names, and it's fun to armchair QB the WOT, and but the silly namecalling has no connection with reality, and the reality is that the imaginary perfect war some folks here think is possible is a crack pipe dream. Could W do some things better? yes. But this silly "al-Bush" crap, while fitting for someone who thinks it'd be better to have the Dems win in '08, displays a disconnect between what is truly important (Afghanistan and Iraq) and what is just stupid but ultimately meaningless (a "goodwill" tour of an airport). And the "selling out Israel to the UN" shows an even greater disconnect from verifiable reality.
BTW, your whole post collapses at the source. WorldNetDaily is the right's version of TruthOut.com or whatever the hell that site is called.
Actually of the current crop, Rudy is the best on the war on terror. I hate his stance on abortion but being pro-life is a moot point when the jihadists are pushing Armageddon.
As for Bush, I stick by my posts. Being better than treasonous Dims doesn't excuse him for repeatedly and willfully breaking his constitutional oath to defend this country against enemies, both foreign and domestic. The lesser of two evils is still evil.
I don't read WND anymore.
It has become a waste of time - unless you're looking for entertainment...
And as I pointed out, the story has been posted elsewhere, including National Review Online.
And trashing the source doesn't detract from the veracity of the content.
Punctuation is a good thing.
You may have a point here, but I can't tell with your run on sentences. So, I stopped reading it, as many people will do. Lack of punctuation also suggests the poster is ignorant - not a good thing if you are trying to make an intelligent point.
Not trying to be ugly here - I'd like to know what you have to say, but I'm not gonna decipher it - my time is limited.
So, are we forgetting that Mr Bush is still conducting a two front war against the total weight of world and senatorial opinion?
1. Have you heard the President anytime in recent history, call Islam a religion of peace?
2. You will have to name names, times, and places for the Islamic thug question, and in partial answer, President Bush probably has to have meetings and conversations, and photo ops with a whole host of folks he'd rather not, but in the interest of propriety, and show, he has to do a lot of things he might prefer not.
3. CAIR seems to be one of the main go-betweens right now, and we wouldn't want to antagonize our "friends" in the Muslim world, by jailing their hirees in the US. A show tour is a small price to pay while waiting for sufficient rope to appear for the hanging, which can happen when the organization is sufficiently emboldened by appearances that it can do no wrong.
4. I would want to hear the answer to this question, from the sold down the riveree's, and not from someone with a perception that someone else was sold down the river. At the moment their is a mountain of rhetoric on the subject, and the vote is not in that I've seen. You are joining the "sky is falling" crowd of roosters crowing much about appearances that are not substantiated in fact.
I think it is perfectly normal to have issues with a president and his policies. I have issues with the fact that he is not conservative, doesn't share my views on immigration, spends too much money, but he is the president and God help us if anyone from the opposition party was to walz into the office with contrary views on the subject of the war on radical Islam.
Personally, I don't thing Mr Bush gives any thought whatsoever to his position in history, unlike some other recent presidents. He has the fate of the USA and it's people upper most on his mind, and that's good enough for me. Stop hammering on the President for your lack of faith in your own selection in the voting booth and your inability to see past the nose on your face. It's a disease that infects the left, and moderates, (same thing) not grounded citizens.
Ditto
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.