Skip to comments.
FDA Says Viruses Safe for Treating Meat
Forbes.com ^
| 08.18.2006
| ANDREW BRIDGES
Posted on 08/18/2006 10:46:14 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
1
posted on
08/18/2006 10:46:15 PM PDT
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
viruses??
OK.. I eat cold cuts a lot but this is sounding weird. I hope they tested it on humans.
2
posted on
08/18/2006 11:03:04 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(flogerloon.blogspot.com -------------> Rise of the Hate Party)
To: neverdem
I don't particularly trust viruses. They are alien weird.
3
posted on
08/18/2006 11:05:07 PM PDT
by
stands2reason
(ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
To: neverdem
Normally I don't like to name my food before I eat it, but this is sure making me want to introduce two new pets to the back forty:
Sir Loin and Mr. T-Bone
and let's not forget our friend, Mr. Feral Pig. Tasty, and probably less likely to be filled with viral meat.
Viral Meat?
We've gotten to the point where the earth is so perfect, we are now spraying our meat with viruses?
Waaaaay counterintuitive...
4
posted on
08/18/2006 11:10:47 PM PDT
by
dandelion
To: neverdem
Why don't they just irradiate it?
5
posted on
08/18/2006 11:34:57 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Peace begins in the womb.)
To: dandelion; Lijahsbubbe
The viruses are the first to win FDA approval for use as a food additive I think we are safer with Clark Griswold's non-nutritive semi-osmotic cereal varnish.
6
posted on
08/18/2006 11:40:49 PM PDT
by
Thinkin' Gal
(As it was in the days of NO...)
To: neverdem
My baloney has a first name - it's B-I-R-D. My baloney has a second name - its F-L-U.
7
posted on
08/18/2006 11:45:23 PM PDT
by
REDWOOD99
To: neverdem
that kill hundreds of people a yearI wasn't aware of this. Do they ever tell us the truth about anything?
8
posted on
08/18/2006 11:57:37 PM PDT
by
NRA2BFree
(Have you seen my tag line? I accidentally deleted it. ;o))
To: dandelion
We've gotten to the point where the earth is so perfect, we are now spraying our meat with viruses? Now that you put it that way, it does sound pretty weird. LOL! Can you picture someone ordering a burger saying, "I'll take two squirts of virus A and one squirt of virus B on that burger." Talk about weird. ;o)
9
posted on
08/19/2006 12:09:00 AM PDT
by
NRA2BFree
(Have you seen my tag line? I accidentally deleted it. ;o))
To: neverdem
Irradiation is the way to go. Irradiated milk often doesn't have to be refrigerated until it's opened. And it's totally safe.
10
posted on
08/19/2006 12:18:56 AM PDT
by
mysterio
To: Jeff Chandler
Why don't they just irradiate it?
Because people are uninformed, and the radiation boogeyman sacres them. Irradiated food is very safe.
11
posted on
08/19/2006 12:21:18 AM PDT
by
mysterio
To: mysterio
Irradiated food is very safe. If they were serious about food borne illness, they would insist upon irradiation. Of course, then there's the Hygiene Hypothesis...
12
posted on
08/19/2006 12:28:18 AM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Peace begins in the womb.)
To: NRA2BFree
13
posted on
08/19/2006 12:33:27 AM PDT
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: Jeff Chandler; mysterio
The problem with irradiation is that its benefit ends the moment the meat leaves the irradiation machine. If any bacteria survive the irradiation process or if the meat is improperly handled after the irradiating is completed, the consumer can still be exposed to potentially deadly bacteria. By utilizing a live defense like a bacteria killing virus, the meat can be protected from pathogens from the slaughtering process all the way through the cooking process.
I'm not really concerned about the fact that viruses are being sprayed onto food we're going to eat...using viruses to fight disease really isn't all that different from the virus based vaccines that we've been injecting into our children for the better part of a century.
My concern is this: If the viruses are not completely neutralized during the cooking process, what effect will it have on the beneficial bacteria that naturally live in our intestines? I'm not so keen on eating "sterile" meat if raging diarrhea is a potential side effect.
To: neverdem
Birds eat the lizards, snakes eat the birds, monkeys eat the snakes, winter kills the monkeys...I think we're all good.
15
posted on
08/19/2006 1:29:40 AM PDT
by
Squeako
(ACLU: "Only Christians, Boy Scouts and War Memorials are too vile to defend.")
To: Arthalion
I'm not really concerned about the fact that viruses are being sprayed onto food we're going to eat...using viruses to fight disease really isn't all that different from the virus based vaccines that we've been injecting into our children for the better part of a century.There is a itsy bitsy difference between tickling an immune system and massacring bacteria. Bite bacteria back.
To: NRA2BFree
Soon when you go to Macca's ,instead of asking if you want fries they'll say "Do you want virus with that?"
17
posted on
08/19/2006 1:49:07 AM PDT
by
cavador
To: cavador
"So nat'ralists observe, a flea
Hath smaller fleas that on him prey,
And these have smaller fleas that bite 'em,
And so proceed ad infinitum." -Jonathan Swift
To: Jeff Chandler
I think we both know the answer to that.
To: neverdem
Historically it hasn't worked, it caused diarea. The E. coli stuff here will also do the same thing. There will also be mutations.
They should put this stuff only on only certain foods, label it as such and leave the regular food alone.
20
posted on
08/19/2006 2:15:18 AM PDT
by
spunkets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson