Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Touted guests missing at Harris rally
St. Petersburg Times ^ | 8/18/2006 | ANITA KUMAR

Posted on 08/18/2006 7:00:26 AM PDT by Happy Valley Dude

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 08/18/2006 7:00:28 AM PDT by Happy Valley Dude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Happy Valley Dude

Oopsie!


2 posted on 08/18/2006 7:01:31 AM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy Valley Dude

"They confirmed that they would be here," Harris told reporters later. "I don't know what the problem is."



The lady better buy a clue shortly if she even once to be close enough to smell the roses.


3 posted on 08/18/2006 7:05:12 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy Valley Dude

Why doesn't this poor woman just pack it up and go home.


4 posted on 08/18/2006 7:05:54 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy Valley Dude

I am incensed about the way the GOP is treating Harris. She showed a lot of backbone in 2000 when she did her job in spite of media outrages against her for her looks, dress, etc. Jeb Bush should be supportig her, as well as the rest of them.

vaudine


5 posted on 08/18/2006 7:08:13 AM PDT by vaudine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vaudine

ditto


6 posted on 08/18/2006 7:10:22 AM PDT by Hoodat ( ETERNITY - Smoking, or Non-smoking?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vaudine
I am incensed about the way the GOP is treating Harris. She showed a lot of backbone in 2000 when she did her job in spite of media outrages against her for her looks, dress, etc. Jeb Bush should be supportig her, as well as the rest of them.

I'm surprised you feel that way. I think most folks would agree that the GOP should not be supporting one candidate over the other during a party primary. Once the voters choose the candidate for the general election, that's the time for the party establishment to step in and throw their support behind the primary winner.

7 posted on 08/18/2006 7:10:56 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vaudine

The gratitude of princes...


8 posted on 08/18/2006 7:11:04 AM PDT by Uncle Vlad (You cannot protect peoples' civil liberties if you refuse to protect the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Happy Valley Dude
Well the tree falling on the hangar explains it all.

It must've been a mighty big tree or the world's smallest airplane hangar.

9 posted on 08/18/2006 7:11:38 AM PDT by battlegearboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vaudine
She showed a lot of backbone in 2000 when she did her job........

Once upon a time in America, "doing your job" was expected of you and "doing your job" did not make you any more qualified than anybody else for a seat in the U.S. Senate.

10 posted on 08/18/2006 7:15:14 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

she could have stayed in the House for many years of conservative votes, but her ego and ambition (to my regret)got in the way :(


11 posted on 08/18/2006 7:16:28 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21; kinganamort; katherineisgreat; floriduh voter; summer; Goldwater Girl; windchime; ...


12 posted on 08/18/2006 7:18:09 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Harris Speaks on the War on Terrorism



Washington, Jun 15 -

Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of this strong, proactive defense of our liberties and freedoms from the preying forces of Islamic radicals in their jihad against the core values of our Western civilization.

We did not choose this war. They picked the fight. The events of September 11th represented the final moment of spending our days as bystanders.

Mr. Speaker, this debate is not about the choices which precipitated the war in Iraq. The choice we face today - and Americans will face in November - is between two visions - full commitment to protect our nation and prosecute the global war against terrorists, or complete surrender to Islamic extremists who want to destroy us. There is no middle ground.

Without maintaining pressure upon this global war, we face the grave risk of producing homegrown terrorism. These radical Islamists would rather take their fight to our streets, to our neighborhoods, and to our cities.

The necessity of a proactive, robust strategy recently was reiterated by an ally too well-acquainted with the threat posed by radicalized forces. British Prime Minister Tony Blair said, "We have to act, not react; we have to do so on the basis of prediction not certainty; and such action will often, usually indeed, be outside of our own territory”.

Are we safer today? Absolutely. Should we cut and run form Iraq? NEVER!

As Winston Churchill once said, "We shall not fail or falter; we shall not weaken or tire. Neither the sudden shock of battle nor the long-drawn trials of vigilance and exertion will wear us down. Give us the tools and we will finish the job."

I reserve the balance of my time and I yield the floor.


13 posted on 08/18/2006 7:18:45 AM PDT by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

doing your job is a major miracle these days.

She had it all with the house seat. She has no kids, so she could afford to wait. Was she worried that people would forget her?

This is just like the last time a woman ran against a democrat. Someone correct me but then the woman got 30 percent vs Grahm?


14 posted on 08/18/2006 7:18:46 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Washington, Jul 28 - Representative Katherine Harris (R-FL) today voted for passage of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, legislation aimed at creating safeguards to strengthen and improve pension plans by using commonsense and fundamental reforms.

“Men and women who have worked hard their whole lives should not have to face the loss of their retirement security because of outdated laws and regulations,” said Harris. “This legislation will protect the retirement nest egg of these workers and retirees while preserving the competitiveness of U.S. companies.”


In addition, the Pension Protection Act of 2006 will:


Ø Ensure employers properly and adequately fund their worker pension plans;

Ø Protect taxpayers from costly bailouts of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation;

Ø Require companies to provide more information to workers about the status of their pension plans; and

Ø Make commonsense modifications to defined contribution laws to encourage greater personal savings for retirement and other needs.


15 posted on 08/18/2006 7:19:46 AM PDT by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: vaudine

Hey, when you've got to go to the dermatologist, you've got to go to the dermatologist.


16 posted on 08/18/2006 7:20:36 AM PDT by lugsoul (Livin' in fear is just another way of dying before your time. - Mike Cooley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vaudine

"I am incensed about the way the GOP is treating Harris."
_______________________________

I agree!

Unless she holds some really radical positions that I am unaware of, her treatment is a disgrace. I think her treatment is a perfect example of how the PUBS have "morphed" into careerists.


17 posted on 08/18/2006 7:31:58 AM PDT by wmfights (Psalm : 27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wmfights
"holds some really radical positions"? And then some.

18 posted on 08/18/2006 7:36:53 AM PDT by notigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: notigar

She is a babe!

Anymore photo's?


19 posted on 08/18/2006 7:46:43 AM PDT by wmfights (Psalm : 27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68
Yes she could have. I guess ego got in the way of reason.

I really feel sorry for her. I think that she was a pretty good congresswoman. I refuse to call her Congressman like my congresswoman insist on.
20 posted on 08/18/2006 7:47:54 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson