Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Bush to Sign Mt Soledad Cross Bill Monday (San Diego, CA)
KOGO ^ | August 14, 2006

Posted on 08/14/2006 1:38:12 PM PDT by TheDon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
A blow against atheist intolerance!!
1 posted on 08/14/2006 1:38:13 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TheDon

2 posted on 08/14/2006 1:39:43 PM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

Woohoo! Score one for the good guys!


3 posted on 08/14/2006 1:39:44 PM PDT by The Blitherer (You were given the choice between war & dishonor. You chose dishonor & you will have war. -Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

YEAH!!!!!! Thanks to hard work by Roger Hedgcock and a ton of other people!!


4 posted on 08/14/2006 1:40:08 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kaboom"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

http://www.soledadmemorial.com/


5 posted on 08/14/2006 1:41:00 PM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

WASHINGTON — The Senate approved without opposition Aug. 1 a bill intended to protect San Diego’s Mount Soledad cross as a memorial to military veterans.

Senators agreed by unanimous consent to grant to the federal government ownership of the Mount Soledad Veterans Memorial, a 29-foot cross that stands atop an 800-foot mountain and has been a target of church-state separationists. The House of Representatives voted 349-74 for the same measure July 19.

President Bush is expected to sign it into law on 14 Aug 2006.

The legislation would sign over ownership of the property to the federal government to preserve it as a national military war memorial, which would be administered by the Department of Defense. The federal government would be required to pay an appropriate amount for the property and would be barred from extending its boundaries.

The Senate action marked another in a series of recent wins for those seeking to prevent a court from removing the cross, which was erected in 1954 as a tribute to veterans of the Korean War.

Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy blocked enforcement of a federal judge’s order for San Diego to remove the cross by Aug. 1 or pay $5,000 a day in fines. Kennedy's July 7 decision prevented fines until the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court rules on the case. The Ninth Circuit will hear the case in mid-October.

Congress passed in 2004 a bill designating the cross as a national memorial in honor of veterans and authorizing federal ownership of it if San Diego donated it. In 2005, San Diego voters approved with a 76 percent majority an initiative authorizing the city to give the memorial to the federal government. A state judge, however, ruled the measure was unconstitutional.

Rep. Duncan Hunter, R.-Calif., sponsored the House bill approved by the Senate. California Sens. Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein, both Democrats, urged their colleagues to approve Hunter’s measure.

The Mt Soledad Memorial Association will continue to operate and maintain the site and design the plaques under current criteria.

http://www.soledadmemorial.com/news.html


6 posted on 08/14/2006 1:42:53 PM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
The attorney for the atheist who has been trying to remove the cross for more than 15 years told KOGO passage of this bill will not stop his efforts to get rid of the cross

I guess he will take it to the world court.

7 posted on 08/14/2006 1:43:31 PM PDT by Ben Mugged (Why is it that our children can't read a Bible in school, but they can in prison?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy
YEAH!!!!!! Thanks to hard work by Roger Hedgcock and a ton of other people!!

Rick Roberts, too (to be included in the ton of other people)!

8 posted on 08/14/2006 1:43:54 PM PDT by Christian4Bush (The only way to bring a permanent peace is to eliminate the permanent threat. - FReeper Optimist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Christian4Bush

Amen!!


9 posted on 08/14/2006 1:46:22 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kaboom"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

This transfers the cross to federal property? What happened to the suggestion that the property be sold to a private organization?


10 posted on 08/14/2006 1:52:05 PM PDT by My2Cents (A pirate's life for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

Great news. Now can we get Congress to act equally quick on equally important legislation pending??


11 posted on 08/14/2006 1:55:11 PM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

There was some sort of restriction for the city to sell the land; perhaps now that it's federal, a sale to a private party can be done.


12 posted on 08/14/2006 1:57:03 PM PDT by skr (We cannot play innocents abroad in a world that is not innocent.-- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

The court held that selling the property to a private party was an unconstitutional attempt to bypass the issue and invalidated the sale.

See, the issue isn't to keep the government from supporting religion. The issue is to get that cross down.


13 posted on 08/14/2006 2:09:45 PM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
voters approved with a 76 percent majority an initiative authorizing the city to give the memorial to the federal government. A state judge, however, ruled the measure was unconstitutional.

Which says all you need to know.

14 posted on 08/14/2006 2:12:25 PM PDT by Condor 63
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RonF
We'll see whether the court ignores this act of congress like they ignored the bill to shift jurisdiction of Terri Schiavo's case to the federal courts.

The judiciary hates it when the legislative and executive act to provide some "checks and balances" on its abuse of power.

15 posted on 08/14/2006 2:17:16 PM PDT by My2Cents (A pirate's life for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
I guess he will take it to the world court.

Hire some Islamist to blow it up.

16 posted on 08/14/2006 2:18:14 PM PDT by My2Cents (A pirate's life for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

take that ACLU!


17 posted on 08/14/2006 2:37:10 PM PDT by GodfearingTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

Congressman Duncan Hunter and other local officials will be on hand for the President's signing of the bill to transfer the cross to the federal government.

President Bush is scheduled to sign the bill into law transferring the Mt. Soledad Cross and property on which is sets to the federal government.



Suck on that ACLU!!!!


18 posted on 08/14/2006 2:43:02 PM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonF

FTACLU!!


19 posted on 08/14/2006 3:16:49 PM PDT by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
The attorney for the atheist who has been trying to remove the cross for more than 15 years told KOGO passage of this bill will not stop his efforts to get rid of the cross.

************

Imagine having that be your life's work.

20 posted on 08/14/2006 3:20:15 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson