Posted on 08/13/2006 6:07:12 AM PDT by InfantryMarine
Link?
If Hillary is elected in 08, will she put her wife in charge of health care???
and they say there is no good news.........
conclusion: the attempted take over of New Hampshire by Massachusetts has failed.
This article makes a delicious breakfast. Thanks!
No, that's the point of the article. The hatred is so intense, these Dems are NOT likely to vote for her.
Nothing like a little good news on a Sunday morning.
"Were talking: Criminal . . . megalomaniac . . . fraud . . . dangerous . . . devil incarnate . . . satanic . . . power freak.
Satanic.
And: Political wh***."
Reality!
"Hillarys growing brain trust in the partys upper reaches already knows she has high negatives among ordinary Democrats. They think she can win those voters over with the right strategy and message."
UNreality : )
I have been saying for 2 years that the visceral hatred for Hillary goes to the bone. She cannot win.
The Hildabeast will not get elected because of rural New Hampshire voters . It will be the inner city Kool-aid drinking social program misfits it always is .
(Go Israel, Go! Slap 'Em Down Hezbullies.)
I agree something along those lines will happen. The majority of Dems will vote for anyone over a Republican. It is possible that some will simply stay home or vote green or whatever leftist third party we have in 08.
I see it more this way. The Dems cannot win only with a majority of Dems voting for their candidate. They must have extremely heavy turnout along with a sizeable chunk of the wishy washy "moderates" that vacillate between parties. And this needs to be coupled with a less than massive Republican turnout.
Hillary does not have a good shot at the "moderates". The real unknown is whether the Republicans can turn out the vote as they have done in the last few elections. Baring putting out a complete loser candidate, the election will be the Republican's to lose. How comforting is that given the history of the party's skill at turning victory into defeat?
Oh, and one other thing to consider. Without the swiftboat vets participation, Kerry could well have won. The RNC and the Bush campaign did not go after Kerry at all on these huge weaknesses of his. 08 will be VERY ugly, especially if Hillary is the Dem nominee. She will be the press's darling and not be called to task on anything she says. So, the last big variable is, will the Republican candidate's campaign have the backbone to call her on her lies? Or will they suffer them because of fear of the press?
This could set up a terribly bloody and divisive DemonRAT convention in '08.
Won't that be just terrible?
Good point. It's way too early to be dancing on the political grave of the hillary creature. All she has to do is get that hatred down to mere dislike. Then she can play the usual 'rat vicitm crap, and then all she needs is for the 'rats in the trenches to dislike her less than they dislike the GOP candidate, whoever that is. And we cannot count on the Republican dipwads to knock her down and step on her throat, which is what will be required.
OK, here we go with the which Democrat candidate will die of Arkancide before the national and on what date will the party unify behind Hillary?
My bet is John Edwards and October 23. This way there will no time to engage her in a debate.
Good point! We should start a Ghoul Pool.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.