Skip to comments.
Oops! Absentee Ballots Went Out Too Late for Aug. 8 more...
http://ctnewsjunkie.com/index.php/2006/08/02/oops_absentee_ballots_went_out_too_late_8 ^
Posted on 08/08/2006 2:15:52 PM PDT by Grendel9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
This juicy little item might come to play in Connecticutt tonight!
1
posted on
08/08/2006 2:15:54 PM PDT
by
Grendel9
To: Grendel9
Supreme irony here if Joe lost to military ballots (which presumably would favor him over Lamont), considering his hand in suppressing same in 2000.
2
posted on
08/08/2006 2:17:57 PM PDT
by
Uncledave
To: Uncledave
Yes. It would sweet.
3
posted on
08/08/2006 2:21:37 PM PDT
by
stevio
(Red-Blooded Crunchy Con American Male (NRA))
To: Uncledave
Screw the military vote, again. Hard to believe it is an accident in a race that revolved around war policy.
4
posted on
08/08/2006 2:23:34 PM PDT
by
ClaireSolt
(.)
To: ClaireSolt
It's worked for them more than once already, until they pay a price they will continue to do it.
5
posted on
08/08/2006 2:27:35 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(The worst thing about censorship is XXXXXXXXXXXXX)
To: Uncledave
Actually, Joe did us a favor in 2000 by going on the Sunday morning talk shows and stating his opinion that every effort should be made to count military ballots. Gore fumed.
It was a slick party hack in Philadelphia who wrote the memo on how to disqualify military ballots. Something like 40% of them were, in fact, diqualified for the most trivial of reasons such as an illegible postmark. According to Bill Sammon's book At Any Cost, the Democrat hacks stood up, cheered and high fived each other when the disqualified military votes were able to increase GWB's lead by only a few hundred votes.
The crap they pulled on the military votes came back to bite them big time when they pulled out their "count every vote" mantra over dimples, chads and double marked ballots in an attempt to manufacture additional votes from their key precincts-- the only precincts, by the way, which got counted more than once. Thus, the supposed 580 vote lead (or whatever it was) should have been, had all votes been treated equally, at least 10 times that margin.
To: Grendel9
Sounds like something Christine Gregoire would try!
7
posted on
08/08/2006 2:30:24 PM PDT
by
Paperdoll
(........Washington Staters, Vote for McGavick!)
To: Uncledave
Yes...isn't that called Schedenfruede...
8
posted on
08/08/2006 2:30:35 PM PDT
by
Txsleuth
((((((((ISRAEL)))))))))
To: Txsleuth
9
posted on
08/08/2006 2:35:00 PM PDT
by
ZGuy
To: Grendel9
To: Vigilanteman
It was a slick party hack in Philadelphia who wrote the memo on how to disqualify military ballots. Wasn't that Ed Rendel? If there's one thing Democrats do best, it's stealing elections.
11
posted on
08/08/2006 2:36:42 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
(A pirate's life for me.)
To: ZGuy
12
posted on
08/08/2006 2:44:00 PM PDT
by
Txsleuth
((((((((ISRAEL)))))))))
To: Vigilanteman
BTW, they didn't even need a postmark.
13
posted on
08/08/2006 2:44:23 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
(-/sarcasm)
To: Uncledave
Supreme irony here if Joe lost to military ballots (which presumably would favor him over Lamont), considering his hand in suppressing same in 2000.Thou shalt not steal
14
posted on
08/08/2006 2:47:43 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: My2Cents
Ed Rendell is still a slick party hack. He's just been promoted to governor now.
To: Grendel9; patriciaruth; AIC; airborne; AirForceBrat23; Alamo-Girl; ALOHA RONNIE; angelsonmyside; ...
85 Town Clerks failed to send absentee ballots to the military and uniformed officers oversees in time for Aug. 8 primary.One would be believable - but 85?
16
posted on
08/08/2006 2:53:26 PM PDT
by
Libloather
(I would give my left arm to be ambidextrous...)
To: Libloather
To: Grendel9
Joe, there is a g-d after all.
18
posted on
08/08/2006 2:56:50 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: Vigilanteman
LIEberman only backed off the effort to disenfranchize the military votes when it became clear that it was not polling well.
He sat in on the meeting when the plan was dicussed and he never voiced any opposition.
19
posted on
08/08/2006 2:58:07 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: Vigilanteman
You can spin your defense of LIEberman all you want. It does not change the facts. You can blame anyone you want, it does not change the truth.
20
posted on
08/08/2006 2:59:34 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
