Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israel responded to an unprovoked attack by Hizbullah, right? Wrong
guardian.co.uk ^ | 8/7/06 | George Monbiot

Posted on 08/07/2006 5:24:28 PM PDT by GeorgiaDawg32

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: GeorgiaDawg32
It seems clear that if Israel had handed over the prisoners, it would - without the spillage of any more blood - have retrieved its men and reduced the likelihood of further kidnappings.

It may seem clear to the surrender monkey writer, but he's a fool if it does.

What IS clear is that if Israel had negotiated a prisoner exchange it would have only meant that Hezballah and HAMAS would have then kidnapped more Israelis and negotiated another prisoner swap, and then they would have kidnapped more Israelis and negotiated another swap, and then kidnapped more..........and on and on ad infinitum.

The proper response to terrorist kidnapping and extortion is to assume that the hostages are either already dead or will be killed no matter what concessions are made, and go ahead with an overwhelming, crushing attack on the terrorists to demonstrate what will happen each and every time they try that game. That course of action is awfully hard on the kidnapping victims, but it may well prevent many more victims being taken and probably killed.

41 posted on 08/07/2006 6:50:05 PM PDT by epow (Proudly fighting on FR for truth , justice, and the last slice of leftover pizza since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32

George Monbiot = George MOONBAT


42 posted on 08/07/2006 6:53:59 PM PDT by Jameison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32

Ah, he seems upset that Israels army was doing its job making contingency plans for an invasion.


43 posted on 08/08/2006 12:16:18 AM PDT by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32

Monbiot seems to have done very little research here. Hizbollah was not interested in the release of 15 prisoners taken in Lebanese territory and held in breach of the Geneva Conventions it was interested only in winning the freedom of three Lebanese, primarily Samir Kuntar.

Kuntar killed an Israeli family in Nahariya, crushing the skull of a four year old girl between the butt of his rifle and a rock.

Somehow, Mr Monbiot seems unaware that no Geneva Convention can come to the aid of the appropriately named Kuntar.

The only valid point that Monbiot makes -- and then only accidentally -- is that Hizbollah's capture of the two Israeli soldiers was not unprecedented. It was unfortunate that previous Israeli governments agreed to a German-brokered prisoner swap in the past to appease domestic opinion.

Nasrallah declared his 2005/2006 main objective to be the release of Kuntar and his chaps and tried to seize Israeli soldiers on 11 occasions. Those attempts all took place in the Shebaa farms and failed.


44 posted on 08/21/2006 3:07:06 AM PDT by propertius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson