Posted on 08/03/2006 5:49:23 PM PDT by blam
You're one of those bohunks I mentioned: Transitional Vertebrate Fossils FAQ (read it and learn something).
Getting your evolution information from creationist sites is like getting your conservative information from Michael Moore.
And you prove the case even more, the godless liberal can never actual answer the issue, but resorts to namecalling.
1. Assuming the only place people get any information is from websites shows your own perspective, not that of the scientific world within which I study.
2. Slandering reputable websites which DO expose the pseudo-science of Darwinianism is wrong, but typically godless liberal behavior.
3. Trying to associate yourself as a conservative on this issue by name association/name refutation is a fallacy and lying. You merely deflect the real issue:
There is NO evidence for species transitioning into different species. Evolution has been disproven.
God says when we sin, it is against HIM. You are in direct oppostion to God when you persist in lying and slander.
The greater scientific studies we have now show evidence for design, not organs evolving into other organs. The depth at which we can now look even within the individual cell, shows far more complexity than we ever thought possible.
If the environment was rich enough in resources, they wouldn't have needed agriculture.
One of the advantages early humans had in the Middle East was wild grain in sufficient quantities to harvest without planting.
There are a couple of theories on this, one that humans developed an early taste for beer, and another that they really did plant these wild grains only just scattering sort of like you scatter grass seed on your lawn.
Think about it. If you gather seed, and store it, if it gets wet it will sprout. If it gets very wet, it will ferment.
So it's easy to imagine that a cache of wild grain got wet, sprouted, and some genius figured that if you put the seeds on the ground you'll get more grain.
Another genius figured out that if you put a lot of water on grain in a hole in the rock, it will ferment and you can get high.
We know this happened in the Middle East, we just don't know exactly when.
Again the godless liberal claim that man was so stupid back then...
Instead, Scripture says he was so brilliant, he actually named everything, from the animals to the plants, which is quite a feat if you look at a biology or agriculture textbook index.
Why the persistent claim that early man had less than current brain power? Because if you admit that they were like us, you are by inference admitting that part of Scripture is true, and by inference if you admit it's God's word, then you should be following it, but you aren't, so it's easier just to shut Him out entirely, and lie.
Christians understand the thinking, because we too are sinful humans. The distinction is, we now have a new nature, and want truth, and can see it, when you can't.
|
|
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother & Ernest_at_the_Beach | |
Just updating the GGG info, not sending a general distribution. |
|
|
|
|
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother & Ernest_at_the_Beach | |
Just updating the GGG info, not sending a general distribution. |
|
|
Note: this topic is from . Thanks blam.
They have already found tools from the Middle Palaeolithic period that are between 130,000 and 40,000 years old, and could have been made by either Neanderthals or early modern humans, as well as a few Acheulian tools that could date back several hundred thousand years.
Real prophets climb mountains to be closer to God.
They don’t crawl into holes to listen to the hissings of The Serpent.
Many will worship Colossus and Guardian.
Even now, people have unconditional faith in the models that come out of computers. *cough* Fauci *cough*
I really want to see this article. But the link goes to the general courier home page that does not have the article, or it has been removed from the courier.
Check this one out
I think you're denigrating Neanderthals. Shame on you! Do you know any Neanderthals? Have you met any Neanderthals? How dare you!
/S I think the Neanderthals were not as bad as modern humans, or there would be more of them left than some genes and a bunch of cave sites and such. They were either not as warlike as we are, or they didn't reproduce as well. Maybe both. Just remember! Humans are no damn good!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.