Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Puzzling breakdown (What the homo life style costs us)
Waterbury Republican-American ^ | July 31, 2006 | Editorial

Posted on 07/31/2006 4:57:26 PM PDT by Graybeard58

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Thebaddog

"What is the cost of dying of natural causes after raising a family, drinking moderately, eating red meat off the grill on Saturday, and being a Cubs fan?"

EArly exit due to a broken heart. Cub fans die cheap, screaming the phrase "Just wait'll next year!"


21 posted on 07/31/2006 6:25:16 PM PDT by TexanToTheCore (This space for hire...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
Or BARTMAN!!!

BTW, do you know what they say is the worst thing about dying of AIDS?

22 posted on 07/31/2006 6:27:33 PM PDT by DrewsDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

The subject is public funding. Unless there is specific advocacy by a convincing group of interested people, the money usually goes to where it should do the most good.

I can't speak for private efforts.


23 posted on 07/31/2006 6:31:32 PM PDT by exit82 (If Democrats can lead, then I'm Chuck Norris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DrewsDad

No, what?


24 posted on 07/31/2006 6:33:57 PM PDT by Thebaddog (Labs Rules! Brilliant!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog

Leaving your friends behind.


25 posted on 07/31/2006 6:37:31 PM PDT by DrewsDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DrewsDad

Good one.


26 posted on 07/31/2006 6:43:21 PM PDT by Thebaddog (Labs Rules! Brilliant!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ninenot; sittnick; steve50; Hegemony Cricket; Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; FITZ; arete; ...
The most stunning number, however, was $212,330, which is what taxpayers cough up for each HIV/AIDS fatality. In 2007, they will contribute a staggering $2.9 billion for HIV/AIDS research, which is only slightly less than the total for diabetes and Alzheimer's, respiratory and kidney diseases. They afflict tens of millions more Americans than AIDS, yet comparatively, they get the short end of the funding stick.

Bump

27 posted on 07/31/2006 6:49:10 PM PDT by A. Pole ("Gay marriage" - Karl Rove's conspiracy to defeat Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

Aids is not a disease.

Aids is a RESULT.

Aids is 99.999999% preventable, guaranteed.

These are the most common ways that HIV is transmitted from one person to another:

NUMBER 1 - by having sex (anal, vaginal, or oral) with an HIV-infected person;

This is by far the most prevelant way AIDS is spread.

NUMBER 2 - by sharing needles or injection equipment with an injection drug user who is infected with HIV;

NUMBER 3 - from HIV-infected women to their babies before or during birth, or through breast-feeding after birth.

Since Number 3 can only occur if the woman is HIV positive, that means she did it by #1 or #2.


HIV also can be transmitted through receipt of infected blood or blood clotting factors. However, since 1985, all donated blood in the United States has been tested for HIV. Therefore, the risk of infection through transfusion of blood or blood products is extremely low. The U.S. blood supply is considered to be among the safest in the world.


If every person in the US were tested, starting in 1985, and all AIDS carriers remained monogomaous and didn't do needle drugs, there would be no AIDS cases in the US.

Why are we spending billions of dollars per year on a totally preventable disease? Because Homosexuals want their lifestyle validated.


28 posted on 07/31/2006 6:51:22 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DrewsDad; Thebaddog

I've heard the first symptom is a pounding in the butt.


29 posted on 07/31/2006 6:54:48 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

I've said this for a long time, this is what the gay marriage issue is really about. Medical benefits for the infected gay partner.


30 posted on 07/31/2006 6:56:54 PM PDT by irish guard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
The July/August AARP Bulletin had a piece on federal aid for medical research in which it criticized the President Bush...

This is why I have nothing to do with the AARP. Why would I spend a farthing on a membership to an association that attacks my political choices and beliefs?

(And, I really don't think that their insurances and other "benefits" are anything special.)

Also, and changing subjects, many other posters correctly realize that many (but not all) AIDS cases are self inflicted (I.V. needle sharing and homosexual "lifestyle").

Although every HIV case is a tragedy, A cynic might say that rather than being "victims", many of those afflicted with AIDS are "volunteers".

.

31 posted on 07/31/2006 7:19:59 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seaplaner
that many (but not all) AIDS cases are self inflicted (I.V. needle sharing and homosexual "lifestyle").

There are victims to be sure. Babies born with it as a result of having a parent who is infected. Those who unknowingly have sex with one who is infected and blood transfusions donated by the infected.

Are there any other victims?

It would seem that all who have it got it from another, either directly or indirectly, whose life style included homosexual sex or needle sharing.

32 posted on 07/31/2006 7:26:58 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
There are victims to be sure. Babies born with it as a result of having a parent who is infected. Those who unknowingly have sex with one who is infected and blood transfusions donated by the infected.

I agree completely!

.

33 posted on 07/31/2006 7:29:25 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
We can argue about the morality of enabling homosex all we want, but on a purely epidemiological and statistical plane, the NIH is on solid ground.

Hi, Jocelyn, we recall your pithy statement as the Clintonoid Surgeon- General when you announced that the life of a fiftyish white guy with heart disease was worth less than that of a thirtyish drug addict in the gutter. Nice work. Now that AIDS carriers are living routinely into their fifties and beyond, sucking up free antidepressants, antiretrovirals, and disablility checks (among even more unsavory commodities,) while contributing nothing of lasting worth, your smug certitudes ring even more hollow.

34 posted on 07/31/2006 7:51:19 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
the NIH is on a sound actuarial footing when they fund AIDS research in the manner they do

The Nazi Party was on sound actuarial footing when they decided to eliminate "useless eaters" from the public dole.

35 posted on 07/31/2006 7:55:03 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
We're all at risk for having our chosen lifestyles modified by HIV

Speak for yourself, Bruce. Any rational "chosen lifestyle" will entail no greater risk of AIDS than of being hit by lightning, and will not have to be "modified."

36 posted on 07/31/2006 7:59:05 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: exit82
Money spent for cures for cancer, for instance, would be more beneficial to more people and more families than HIV/AIDS, but doesn't have the media spotlight that HIV/AIDS has had bestowed upon it.

It's worse in Africa - a very small percentage of the money given to AIDS care could save millions of people.

Liberals care about drug addicts and "people who have sex with anything that moves" more than any other medical group. It's obvious when you follow the money ...

37 posted on 07/31/2006 8:21:35 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

I think it is important to point out that the HIV/AIDS research is providing benefits in other areas as well. Hepatitis C for one. There are millions infected with HepC and the treatment protocols are related to those used to treat HIV.


38 posted on 07/31/2006 10:13:34 PM PDT by ga medic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

My town banned smoking in all bars.

Many subsequently went out of business.

The gay bars, however, are thriving.

Now they can negotiate the transfer of their STD's without being endangered by second hand smoke.

How Special.


39 posted on 07/31/2006 10:37:01 PM PDT by NaughtiusMaximus (WARNING: Alcohol may cause you to think you are whispering when you are definitely not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Now I know, thank you. So I guess it's a silent "p".


40 posted on 08/01/2006 12:09:01 AM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson