Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Britain and Calif. to join forces on global warming
Houston Comical (AP) ^ | July 31, 2006, 6:36AM | JOHN HEILPRIN

Posted on 07/31/2006 8:05:26 AM PDT by The_Victor

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
I thought, per the Constitution, that only the federal government could enter into international treaties.
1 posted on 07/31/2006 8:05:27 AM PDT by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
"then withdrew U.S. support from the Kyoto treaty requiring industrialized nations to cut their greenhouse gases to below 1990 levels"

Groan.
More Associalistic Press BS.
The Klinton administration had NOT promulgated the Kyoto treaty, and the US Senate had voted OVERWHELMINGLY AGAINST adopting the Kyoto Treaty.
The treaty was already dead in the water before President Bush took power.
He merely put it, out of it's misery for good.
2 posted on 07/31/2006 8:18:17 AM PDT by Jameison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

"The green fundamentalists have never been shy about casting the first stone.

If the world fries because of climate change, they thunder, it will be America's fault. Or, more specifically, George W.'s, because he took the Kyoto Protocol out of the desk drawer where Bill Clinton had stashed it for several years, and definitively binned it. "


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1674996/posts


3 posted on 07/31/2006 8:20:46 AM PDT by Jameison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jameison

Clinton counted the votes prior to submitting the treaty to the US Senate. It was never considered by the legislative branch, thus the US never "withdrew" from anything.


4 posted on 07/31/2006 8:22:05 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
"thus the US never "withdrew" from anything"


Yup.
You can't withdraw from something you never joined in the first place.
But try telling that to he Associalistic Press shills.
5 posted on 07/31/2006 8:26:53 AM PDT by Jameison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
People who accumulate unused carbon allowances — for example, by driving less, or switching to less polluting vehicles — could sell them to people who exceed their allowances — for example by driving more.

How about people that don't have any kids, like me? After all, one of the most environmentally-incorrect things a person could do is burden the earth with more "polluters", right? Damn, I'm gonna be rich!!

6 posted on 07/31/2006 8:36:50 AM PDT by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jameison

I'm constantly amazed at the lack of depth in AP's reporting. It wasn't always this way, I can assure you...


7 posted on 07/31/2006 8:39:26 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

From Article I, Section 10:

"No State shall, without the consent of Congress ... enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power ..."

Foreign relations are delegated to the Federal Government, not to State Governors. Ah-Nold is off base on this one.


8 posted on 07/31/2006 8:46:17 AM PDT by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

So Arnold speaks for the U.S. now?


9 posted on 07/31/2006 9:02:25 AM PDT by npg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

"I thought, per the Constitution, that only the federal government could enter into international treaties."

Since our constitution does say this, a lot of things are called into question with this scenario...


10 posted on 07/31/2006 9:18:49 AM PDT by Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

I wonder how many carbon credits California gets for allowing the USFS to neglect Forest management - encouraging massive fuel build up and resultant heavy wildfire. (Why the Gov. has even exacerbated the situation by unilaterally declaring all roadless areas made under Clinton to remain without roads.) In my valley, we cannot even go outside, the place is so choked with smoke. Of course, no one can get to the fires, so I am told they will continue to burn into winter when the rains and snows put them out.


11 posted on 07/31/2006 9:29:24 AM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

I read somewhere that someone quipped that California was our only State with its own foreign policy. Here's some more proof of that.


12 posted on 07/31/2006 10:00:33 AM PDT by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

The US needs to place sanctions on the rogue state of Californication


13 posted on 07/31/2006 10:05:06 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

Seems like the best market of all would be China and India and other third world countries who are exempted from the Kyoto protocol emissions caps.

They could easily outbid the other countries with their cheaper cost emission levels.

So let's 'sell' all out carbon emissions to them.


14 posted on 07/31/2006 10:42:14 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

.we have enough sanctions on us already...like subsidizing half the U.S. anyway.....


15 posted on 07/31/2006 11:29:16 AM PDT by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

So California is its own country now? Californico? ('course we always knew that, guess it's now official) Where's a San Andreas fault when you need one?


16 posted on 07/31/2006 11:31:04 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

....I thought that was for treaties etc....I think any state can enter into business transactions with anyone that isn't a terrorist state....they do it all the time.....


17 posted on 07/31/2006 11:32:04 AM PDT by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

Deport the illegals. They don't get their old toyota trucks smogged.

Also, try to imagine liberals giving up their SUVs.


18 posted on 07/31/2006 12:14:00 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (Make your choice and save your tears....AM YISRAEL CHAI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10; GeronL

Please. The correct name is Mexifornia.


19 posted on 07/31/2006 12:16:05 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (Make your choice and save your tears....AM YISRAEL CHAI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
After taking office, Bush reversed a 2000 campaign pledge to regulate carbon dioxide emissions

LOL, the ghost of Christie Todd Whitman lives. Bush gave one stump speech in front of a small crowd where a writer inserted CO2 as a pollutant to be regulated. Bush was very clear in the debates and in every other speech that he would not regulate CO2. This was the reason CTW was canned.

20 posted on 07/31/2006 12:21:04 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson