Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican answer for alternative energy and cheap gasoline
Brookes News ^ | May 8, 2006 | Jack Wheeler

Posted on 07/30/2006 10:04:42 PM PDT by GeronL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last
To: Wonder Warthog

Methanol is much more corrosive than ethanol.
My brother in law races carts that run on Metanol.
After each use, he has to shut them down on gas and change the oil.
Runs cool and you can use a high CR.


41 posted on 07/31/2006 5:59:00 AM PDT by mikeybaby (long time lurker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mikeybaby
"Methanol is much more corrosive than ethanol."

Correct, and less corrosive than water. And what that means is that some components in the fuel line need to be replaced with compatible materials. Not an insurmountanble conversion problem.

"My brother in law races carts that run on Metanol. After each use, he has to shut them down on gas and change the oil."

Sounds like these are pretty crappy engines, if they leak enough un-burned methanol past the rings to contaminate the oil. I doubt seriously if this is a problem in real auto engines.

"Runs cool and you can use a high CR."

Correct. So the BEST engine to use with methanol is one designed from the ground up to do so. But any gasoline engine can be converted to run on pure methanol.

42 posted on 07/31/2006 6:27:47 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist; GeronL
Wow, this article is an eye-opener. I'm sold. I didn't realize we had a huge supply of NG.

Without changing our transportation fleet to Natural Gas, the US is expected to require very large imports in the future to meet our demands of Natural Gas. Adding transportation demands would only make this worse. Why would demanding on Russia and Qatar for our fuel be better than Saudi Arabia and Venezuela?

This is also based upon the drillers in the US being permitted to produce Natural Gas in quanity using methods not in widespread use today, including coalbed methane, tight sandstones, and gas shales.

A large proportion of the onshore lower 48 conventional natural gas resource base has been discovered. New reservoir discoveries are expected to be smaller and deeper, and thus more expensive and riskier to develop and produce. Much of the onshore lower 48 nonassociated (NA) conventional natural gas production in the reference case comes from existing large fields, as lower 48 NA onshore conventional natural gas production declines from 4.8 trillion cubic feet in 2004 to 4.2 trillion cubic feet in 2030 (Figure 73). Production of associated-dissolved (AD) natural gas from lower 48 crude oil reserves also declines, from 2.4 trillion cubic feet in 2004 to 2.3 trillion cubic feet in 2030.

Annual Energy Outlook 2006 with Projections to 2030, Oil and Natural Gas, EIA

43 posted on 07/31/2006 6:56:47 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Species8472
100% of Alaskan North Slope oil is kept in America.

You beat me to it.

:-)

44 posted on 07/31/2006 6:58:33 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ME-262
Brazil has greatly reduced their use of foreign oil by using domestically produced ethanol without the US government subsidizing it.

Please read this report from a couple months ago.

Brazil Sugar Ethanol Update – February 2006, USDA Foreign Agricultural Service

It reports that ethanol accounts for approximately 15% of the fuel used in Brazil.

What Brazil has done that made the biggest difference in the last decade was start producing much more of its petroleum resources. If you will look at the following link, you will see how they quit needing foreign oil.

EIA, International Petroleum (Oil) Production Tables

If we're going to use something up let's use up our nuclear fuels that are abundant in our country.

We import more nuclear fuel than we produce domestically.

Uranium Purchased by Owners and Operators of U.S. Civilian Nuclear Power Reactors, 1994-2005 Deliveries

EIA, Uranium Marketing Annual Report

I do believe you can burn coal in them too. Just don't burn the envelopes with the plastic windows in them.

Stoves need to be rated for coal. It will burn hotter than wood and destroy the stove if not designed for coal.

45 posted on 07/31/2006 7:13:57 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DB
NG is much harder to store than propane. You have to cool natural gas to -260F to make it a liquid.

That sure puts a bug in the ointment. I was thinking it would be as easy as propane.
.
46 posted on 07/31/2006 8:29:14 AM PDT by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Richard-SIA
It drove OK, but was noticeably down on power compared to a gas engine

I run my Baja Bug, 1776 engine, on propane and gas. I see no noticeable difference in power or mpg.

If you ran out gas you had to call a tow-truck, you cannot get a ride to the station and fill a bucket or can with Propane, then pour it into the tank

LOL...don't run out of gas!
When you run dual fuel you can switch back to gas by simply throwing the switch on the dash.
.
47 posted on 07/31/2006 8:45:08 AM PDT by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mugs99; DB
Most Natural Gas is stored in depleted reservoirs. It is typically injected during warmer months and withdrawn during cold months to supply the seasonal heating demands.

Storage of Natural Gas

48 posted on 07/31/2006 8:50:30 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Old Student
I can power the stove with a small inverter during power outages.

You have power outages often? You must not live in California, because if you did it would be worldwide news with several threads on FR everytime it happened for whatever reason.

49 posted on 07/31/2006 8:52:30 AM PDT by lewislynn (Fairtax = lies, hope, wishful thinking, conjecture and lack of logic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
"You have power outages often? You must not live in California, because if you did it would be worldwide news with several threads on FR everytime it happened for whatever reason."

Not often, but often enough. I live in Tornado Alley. Oklahoma to most of the rest of the world. We also get the odd ice storm now and again, in winter-time.

Funny you should mention California; I left there in 1973 to avoid the way things were obviously going, even then...
50 posted on 07/31/2006 9:06:54 AM PDT by Old Student (WRM, MSgt, USAF(Ret.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: mugs99

Wagoneer V8, 5,000'-8,000' avg elevation, driving is uphill from here in most directions, reduced power was very clear, about 20%.

I never did run out of fuel, but was dismayed to learn that many fuel stations would not sell to me as they were not licensed to sell propane as motor fuel.
This forced me to use another vehicle for trips outside the immediate area.

How a service station can only be licensed to refill five gallon RV tanks, but not automobiles, makes no sense.
But it does illustrate one of the problems with "alternative" fuels.

Engine still runs great, oil never seemed to get dirty, but the body has disintegrated from rust.

It's still used as a ranch truck, but will never see the paved road again.


51 posted on 07/31/2006 9:24:40 AM PDT by Richard-SIA ("The natural progress of things is for government to gain ground and for liberty to yield" JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Richard-SIA
Wagoneer V8, 5,000'-8,000' avg elevation, driving is uphill from here in most directions, reduced power was very clear, about 20%

I live in the Sierras so driving is uphill for me too. I'm running Omni-Pak ignition, so that could be why I'm not seeing a power loss. I installed the propane conversion when gas went over three bucks a gallon. Propane saves me over a buck per gallon.

I never did run out of fuel, but was dismayed to learn that many fuel stations would not sell to me as they were not licensed to sell propane as motor fuel.

I've had that problem too. I generally run on propane for trips to town and back. For longer trips I run on gas to save the hassle of trying to find a propane station.
.
52 posted on 07/31/2006 10:23:07 AM PDT by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Richard-SIA
Welllll, actually, you can get equal or better power from Ethanol IF the engine is specially built just to run on it

You're correct, I've used the E-85 periodically.

A little less mileage, but there is no reduction in power at all.

53 posted on 07/31/2006 10:46:46 AM PDT by vikzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

NG companies are going nutty lately with new construction and line improvements. (I have a friend who works in the industry. This is his say-so, but he assures me that the industry rags will back him up on it.)


54 posted on 07/31/2006 11:39:19 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

We're talking about storage in automobiles for use as fuel.


55 posted on 07/31/2006 2:09:23 PM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: DB

Sorry, missed that part.

It is tough to install a salt dome on a Honda.

Some larger vehicles like buses use compressed natural gas for fuel. But the tanks do take a significant amount of room.

Some manufactures are providing NG vehicles, like Honda
http://automobiles.honda.com/shopping/landing.aspx?GroupName=Civic&ModelName=Civic+GX&ef_id=1097:3:458d2d5cdec766af0005d621660a2c1e:sGd50NhWlWgAABa0BEMAAAAH:20060731230449


56 posted on 07/31/2006 4:05:45 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Well, I wonder about a great many things.

First of all, from having been around a whiskey still or three, I KNOW the you can run off one batch of mash, save all the alcohol product and send it to a burner under a mash tank of equivalent size and lack enough fuel to make the second equivalently sized mash tank boil. It's simple physics because you must heat the stuff that's left in the bottom of the still that's fed to the hogs later, in addition to the watered down alcohol that is present in the "beer". Let's not even get into how many BTUs were spent on seed processing, pesticides, tractor fuel, transport, and crop processing to get the corn to the mash tanks. This is a black hole for energy production and another boondoggle to fleece the American taxpayers. Stop skinning your ignorance by asking such inane questions while alleging you really believe in such fairy tales in a public forum. Much better alternatives can be found in biodiesels for such things we already produce, like cottonseed oil, and coal gasification to make gasoline.

Second of all, fuel cells don't create MORE energy than is put into them as a fuel. One device on the planet does that, and it is called a Fast Breeder Nuclear Reactor which is not within the scope of your question. The only advantages fuel cells have over regular old hydrogen tanks are; they weigh much less, can take multiple fuel types for inputs, and are much less likely to make so big of a boom when some soccer mom who hates to drive pilots her minivan into you at an intersection.

I come up with my knowledge about running methanol from actually having to operat MANY engines on it over the last 25 years of my life, and if the good Lord lets me live a few dozen more hours, there should be more of it sent under a spark plug by my hand this weekend, but I digress. I run my alcohol motors at 210 degrees F water temperature and do not use an oil cooler, yet I have drained enough "jamocha-shake" oil over time to float the QE2, have seen a pile of $150 each connecting rods rusted all over like junk sitting in the weather for years while they were six months old, have had to pull all the spark plugs out and ratchet engines over when they hydraulically locked due to condensed water collecting in the cylinders between hot laps and the heat race, have had many throttles lock wide open due to carburetor icing....top cylinder lubrication problems....40% of the fuel efficiency (hp/lb-hr terms)...I'm through telling my life's story. If you knew ANYTHING about Thermodynamics, had a grasp of what BTU/lb content of a fuel does to fuel mileage, or understood the concept of "Latent Heat of Evaporation", you wouldn't ask such things. On the other hand, if you ever get some leather shoes or boots that seem a little tight for your tastes, spilling some methanol on them while you stand in the offending footwear works wonders for the fit, but again, I digress.

If you can tell me how you cold start your methanol fueled daily driver and how you keep the aluminum and steel in the fuel and induction system from producing stalagmite/stalagtite/swiss cheese type corrosion due to constant contact with methanol and its vapors, I'd like to hear it. I'll call you a real Wonder then.

Until then, I will stand by my theory that, "Generally, burning anything besides gasoline in a spark ignition engine serves only to remind the experimenter of what a wonder fuel gasoline really is.", from A.W. Gardiner, Professor of Mechanical Engineering. I heard the dude say it in IC Engines class many years ago, and it's still true today!

I don't guess you want to know the difference between nitromethane and nitropropane, what a light touch of amyl nitrate does to both fuels, or why one shouldn't cook the water off a 20% solution of hydrazine using the kitchen stove while having a beer.


57 posted on 07/31/2006 10:14:53 PM PDT by 308MBR ( "She pulled up her petticoat, and I pulled out for Tulsa!" Abstinence training from Bob Wills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Richard-SIA

Blown alcohol dragsters use METHANOL, not ethanol.


58 posted on 07/31/2006 10:27:34 PM PDT by 308MBR ( "She pulled up her petticoat, and I pulled out for Tulsa!" Abstinence training from Bob Wills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Richard-SIA

And WTF is this about "concentrating" the hydrocarbons in alcohols? Does it make them "smarter"? ROTFLMFAO at my own joke!

Have you been hanging out with your local alchemist again? Does your FISH carburetor still work like it did when it was new? How's the cold fusion coming in the laundry?


59 posted on 07/31/2006 10:30:09 PM PDT by 308MBR ( "She pulled up her petticoat, and I pulled out for Tulsa!" Abstinence training from Bob Wills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: mugs99

Alot easier to convert to NG when you're running carbs and no electronics.


60 posted on 07/31/2006 10:36:20 PM PDT by uglybiker (Don't blame me. I didn't make you stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson