Posted on 07/30/2006 10:04:42 PM PDT by GeronL
Methanol is much more corrosive than ethanol.
My brother in law races carts that run on Metanol.
After each use, he has to shut them down on gas and change the oil.
Runs cool and you can use a high CR.
Correct, and less corrosive than water. And what that means is that some components in the fuel line need to be replaced with compatible materials. Not an insurmountanble conversion problem.
"My brother in law races carts that run on Metanol. After each use, he has to shut them down on gas and change the oil."
Sounds like these are pretty crappy engines, if they leak enough un-burned methanol past the rings to contaminate the oil. I doubt seriously if this is a problem in real auto engines.
"Runs cool and you can use a high CR."
Correct. So the BEST engine to use with methanol is one designed from the ground up to do so. But any gasoline engine can be converted to run on pure methanol.
Without changing our transportation fleet to Natural Gas, the US is expected to require very large imports in the future to meet our demands of Natural Gas. Adding transportation demands would only make this worse. Why would demanding on Russia and Qatar for our fuel be better than Saudi Arabia and Venezuela?
This is also based upon the drillers in the US being permitted to produce Natural Gas in quanity using methods not in widespread use today, including coalbed methane, tight sandstones, and gas shales.
A large proportion of the onshore lower 48 conventional natural gas resource base has been discovered. New reservoir discoveries are expected to be smaller and deeper, and thus more expensive and riskier to develop and produce. Much of the onshore lower 48 nonassociated (NA) conventional natural gas production in the reference case comes from existing large fields, as lower 48 NA onshore conventional natural gas production declines from 4.8 trillion cubic feet in 2004 to 4.2 trillion cubic feet in 2030 (Figure 73). Production of associated-dissolved (AD) natural gas from lower 48 crude oil reserves also declines, from 2.4 trillion cubic feet in 2004 to 2.3 trillion cubic feet in 2030.
Annual Energy Outlook 2006 with Projections to 2030, Oil and Natural Gas, EIA
You beat me to it.
:-)
Please read this report from a couple months ago.
Brazil Sugar Ethanol Update February 2006, USDA Foreign Agricultural Service
It reports that ethanol accounts for approximately 15% of the fuel used in Brazil.
What Brazil has done that made the biggest difference in the last decade was start producing much more of its petroleum resources. If you will look at the following link, you will see how they quit needing foreign oil.
EIA, International Petroleum (Oil) Production Tables
If we're going to use something up let's use up our nuclear fuels that are abundant in our country.
We import more nuclear fuel than we produce domestically.
Uranium Purchased by Owners and Operators of U.S. Civilian Nuclear Power Reactors, 1994-2005 Deliveries
EIA, Uranium Marketing Annual Report
I do believe you can burn coal in them too. Just don't burn the envelopes with the plastic windows in them.
Stoves need to be rated for coal. It will burn hotter than wood and destroy the stove if not designed for coal.
You have power outages often? You must not live in California, because if you did it would be worldwide news with several threads on FR everytime it happened for whatever reason.
Wagoneer V8, 5,000'-8,000' avg elevation, driving is uphill from here in most directions, reduced power was very clear, about 20%.
I never did run out of fuel, but was dismayed to learn that many fuel stations would not sell to me as they were not licensed to sell propane as motor fuel.
This forced me to use another vehicle for trips outside the immediate area.
How a service station can only be licensed to refill five gallon RV tanks, but not automobiles, makes no sense.
But it does illustrate one of the problems with "alternative" fuels.
Engine still runs great, oil never seemed to get dirty, but the body has disintegrated from rust.
It's still used as a ranch truck, but will never see the paved road again.
You're correct, I've used the E-85 periodically.
A little less mileage, but there is no reduction in power at all.
NG companies are going nutty lately with new construction and line improvements. (I have a friend who works in the industry. This is his say-so, but he assures me that the industry rags will back him up on it.)
We're talking about storage in automobiles for use as fuel.
Sorry, missed that part.
It is tough to install a salt dome on a Honda.
Some larger vehicles like buses use compressed natural gas for fuel. But the tanks do take a significant amount of room.
Some manufactures are providing NG vehicles, like Honda
http://automobiles.honda.com/shopping/landing.aspx?GroupName=Civic&ModelName=Civic+GX&ef_id=1097:3:458d2d5cdec766af0005d621660a2c1e:sGd50NhWlWgAABa0BEMAAAAH:20060731230449
Well, I wonder about a great many things.
First of all, from having been around a whiskey still or three, I KNOW the you can run off one batch of mash, save all the alcohol product and send it to a burner under a mash tank of equivalent size and lack enough fuel to make the second equivalently sized mash tank boil. It's simple physics because you must heat the stuff that's left in the bottom of the still that's fed to the hogs later, in addition to the watered down alcohol that is present in the "beer". Let's not even get into how many BTUs were spent on seed processing, pesticides, tractor fuel, transport, and crop processing to get the corn to the mash tanks. This is a black hole for energy production and another boondoggle to fleece the American taxpayers. Stop skinning your ignorance by asking such inane questions while alleging you really believe in such fairy tales in a public forum. Much better alternatives can be found in biodiesels for such things we already produce, like cottonseed oil, and coal gasification to make gasoline.
Second of all, fuel cells don't create MORE energy than is put into them as a fuel. One device on the planet does that, and it is called a Fast Breeder Nuclear Reactor which is not within the scope of your question. The only advantages fuel cells have over regular old hydrogen tanks are; they weigh much less, can take multiple fuel types for inputs, and are much less likely to make so big of a boom when some soccer mom who hates to drive pilots her minivan into you at an intersection.
I come up with my knowledge about running methanol from actually having to operat MANY engines on it over the last 25 years of my life, and if the good Lord lets me live a few dozen more hours, there should be more of it sent under a spark plug by my hand this weekend, but I digress. I run my alcohol motors at 210 degrees F water temperature and do not use an oil cooler, yet I have drained enough "jamocha-shake" oil over time to float the QE2, have seen a pile of $150 each connecting rods rusted all over like junk sitting in the weather for years while they were six months old, have had to pull all the spark plugs out and ratchet engines over when they hydraulically locked due to condensed water collecting in the cylinders between hot laps and the heat race, have had many throttles lock wide open due to carburetor icing....top cylinder lubrication problems....40% of the fuel efficiency (hp/lb-hr terms)...I'm through telling my life's story. If you knew ANYTHING about Thermodynamics, had a grasp of what BTU/lb content of a fuel does to fuel mileage, or understood the concept of "Latent Heat of Evaporation", you wouldn't ask such things. On the other hand, if you ever get some leather shoes or boots that seem a little tight for your tastes, spilling some methanol on them while you stand in the offending footwear works wonders for the fit, but again, I digress.
If you can tell me how you cold start your methanol fueled daily driver and how you keep the aluminum and steel in the fuel and induction system from producing stalagmite/stalagtite/swiss cheese type corrosion due to constant contact with methanol and its vapors, I'd like to hear it. I'll call you a real Wonder then.
Until then, I will stand by my theory that, "Generally, burning anything besides gasoline in a spark ignition engine serves only to remind the experimenter of what a wonder fuel gasoline really is.", from A.W. Gardiner, Professor of Mechanical Engineering. I heard the dude say it in IC Engines class many years ago, and it's still true today!
I don't guess you want to know the difference between nitromethane and nitropropane, what a light touch of amyl nitrate does to both fuels, or why one shouldn't cook the water off a 20% solution of hydrazine using the kitchen stove while having a beer.
Blown alcohol dragsters use METHANOL, not ethanol.
And WTF is this about "concentrating" the hydrocarbons in alcohols? Does it make them "smarter"? ROTFLMFAO at my own joke!
Have you been hanging out with your local alchemist again? Does your FISH carburetor still work like it did when it was new? How's the cold fusion coming in the laundry?
Alot easier to convert to NG when you're running carbs and no electronics.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.