Personally, being a native of the Midwest, I kinda like the Blue Ribbon better...8^)
Posted on 07/27/2006 12:01:15 PM PDT by Nachum
Well, some charitable groups have cut them off from inclusion in their drives, and they have otherwise been discriminated against in various "legal" ways.
Yes it is. They can try to couch it anyway they want, but they always want access to other people's children.
Targeting Children, Part 1: How the gay movement intends to capture the next generation
Targeting Children, Part 2: How the homosexual movement uses public schools as instruments of change
Targeting Children, Part 3: Activists encouraging experimentation
Targeting Children, Part 4: Access to children: homosexuality and molestation
"My own sexuality, my own sexual orientation, has never been hidden and never played into my decision," Diaz said in an interview yesterday with The Inquirer. "It has, perhaps, made me more sensitive to the issues."
His own sexuality, of course, includes the use of children for his own sexual gratification.
The answer is that the Boy Scouts cannot be precluded from banning gays from their organization (which is what the Supreme Court case was about). That doesn't mean that a city is forced to give them a below-market rent or really do business with them in any way if they feel the Scouts' policy conflicts with their "anti-discrimination" policy.
Not saying I agree with it, but that's the issue.
Hey sissy man, why don't you seek a dialogue with their fathers?
Boo creepy city solicitor! Hooray beer!
Out of curiosity, do the Boy Scouts have a policy about philandering husbands being scout leaders?
Personally, being a native of the Midwest, I kinda like the Blue Ribbon better...8^)
BTTT and a hearty thank you.
Well, you see, the Supreme Court is the highest authority in the land, when it agrees with the left, but when it does not, it is a battleground of conservative activism and deserves the same answer that Jackson gave it.
republicofdavis does have a point, perhaps, but the affair smacks of harrassment to me, especially if it is the oldest HQ in the country and built by the scouts, etc...
He might be telling the truth. Lord knows there are plenty of heterosexual idiots who think private organizations should be boned by the state, so why not a homosexual?
You know, since folks like Diaz think that the Boy Scouts should have to accept homosexuals, I say we find some guy who hates the First Amendment and sue to get him into the ACLU, and then find a guy who loves people of every color and creed and sue to get him into the Klan.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.