Posted on 07/23/2006 12:14:46 PM PDT by neverdem
Transcriptional Profiling of Aging in Human Muscle Reveals a Common Aging Signature
A Transcriptional Profile of Aging in the Human Kidney click on the sidebar for full text in HTML or PDF.
HOw can they reveal ANYTHING when fingerprints NEVER change?
I think this is bunk ... .
I think you're drunk.
Who ever proved that, or is it just an assumption?
Lets see now.They want everybody to provide them(doctors&hospitals)with the inventory(free organs)so they can make an outlandish profit!
I think if I live long enough, I might be able to get one of them regenerative treatments I read about in one of my sci-fi novels.
Then I'll live to be a few hundred years old, and maybe even collect Social Security.
Brain's Stem Cells Hold Clues to Cancer
FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.
Scary crap....in light of the fact that the aussies are starting to prep NON brain dead people for organ "donation"....
How long until this extends to healthy people?
Imagine opening a strange envolope...the letter reads..
"congratulations....you have been selected for organ donation...you have 24 hrs to put you affairs in order and report to the nearest organ recycling center for extraction."
The office of organ administration.
I mean really...how many falun gong can there be?
ping
I agree. The "donor business" has become an evil. I recently removed my donor card from my wallet and rejoined the "dust onto dust" crowd.
"I think you're drunk."
I take an slur from YOU, as a compliment.
We couldn't be more different.
It's just more junk science posing as objective science.
"I think you're drunk."
Correction:
I take a slur from YOU, as a compliment.
We couldn't be more different.
I am ever so thankful that I am not like you at all.
I wasn't entirely sure that the age of an organ affected it's function.
Like say a Liver or a Pancreas or whatnot....but those are affected by lifestyles and other types of ailments/environmental conditions.
For someone who's apparently seeing double, would it kill ya to read the article once before adding your particular brand of clueless sanctimony.
Did you ever think that they just might want "everybody" to provide them with the "inventory" so that people needing the organs might be able to live? Unfortunately, until science has evolved into being able to grow/clone organs from the DNA of the patient, that's the best system that's available. Unless, that is, you have a better suggestion....
How do you determine junk science?
Neither quantum mechanics nor general relativity made apparent sense, are irreconcilable, yet quantum mechanics works fine when applied to subatomic physics, and general relativity works fine when applied to astronomy. Because of that irreconcilability, physicists have developed the as yet untestable string theory, according to Brian Greene.
and defies the laws of science.
What laws might that be?
What puzzles me is why you have to ask.
IMHO, the honest student of science is the first to admit, "I don't know." The simple fact is that we don't know, by definition, what we don't know. But, we keep on learning new stuff. Just look at what has been learned in the last decade about RNA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.