Skip to comments.
Hastert: House May Challenge Office Search
NewsMax ^
| 7/23/06
| AP
Posted on 07/23/2006 9:33:40 AM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Hastert said he believed Rep. William Jefferson, D-La., was "in big trouble" and that the House would not be joining in support of Jefferson himself. But he said the House separately might seek to make clear its position that the Justice Department cannot randomly and wantonly search lawmakers' offices. So now executing a legal search warrent is a "wanton" search?!
1
posted on
07/23/2006 9:33:41 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
To: wagglebee
Doesn't the House have anything IMPORTANT to work on???
To: wagglebee
There are two different standards : one for the lords and one for the serfs. Sad but not surprising to see Hastert go this route.
3
posted on
07/23/2006 9:35:14 AM PDT
by
mysterio
To: wagglebee
So now executing a legal search warrent is a "wanton" search?!Hastert should have let this dog sleep. But NOOOOO, he had to wake it up again, even with a federal judge ruling against his position.
Wake up and smell the freezer burn, Denny. You are jeopardizing the GOP House members with this nonsense.
4
posted on
07/23/2006 9:37:01 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Glad to see the ink was still working in Bush's veto pen, now that he wisely used it on this bill)
To: wagglebee
Yep, but not for you or me. We fry!
5
posted on
07/23/2006 9:37:23 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Taglines for sale or rent. Good "one liners", 50 cents.)
To: wagglebee
Hastert is barking up the wrong tree on this one. If he succeeds in putting the offices of elected politicians off limits to the police, he will have succeeded in creating a political elite class that is not held to the same laws and standards as the rest of us. Under those circumstances, is it ethical, moral or leagal for those to whom the law no longer applies to create laws that will apply to the rest of us??
6
posted on
07/23/2006 9:39:14 AM PDT
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: wagglebee
It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress.Mark Twain
7
posted on
07/23/2006 9:41:00 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Hastert appears to be running scared. I wonder why. His behavior calls for a closer look.
8
posted on
07/23/2006 9:41:39 AM PDT
by
Dante3
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Doesn't the House have anything IMPORTANT to work on???I'm sure covering their butts is important to them.
9
posted on
07/23/2006 9:41:47 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: wagglebee
If Speaker Hastert was smart he would let this ridiculous stance die a quiet death and admit to all Americans that elected officials are subject to the same laws as everyone else.
The House of Representatives and the Senate should not be a haven that members can use to shield criminal behavior.
10
posted on
07/23/2006 9:42:10 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(DIANA IREY for Congress, PA 12th District: Retire murtha.)
To: wagglebee
Hastert said he believed Rep. William Jefferson, D-La., was "in big trouble" and that the House would not be joining in support of Jefferson himself. But he said the House separately might seek to make clear its position that the Justice Department cannot randomly and wantonly search lawmakers' offices. Yep, it is fine to execute no knock warrents on civilians, sometimes killing innocent people in the process, but we can't legally execute a search warrent legally obtained from a judge and the search done under supervision on a lawmaker, no double standard here. /sar
11
posted on
07/23/2006 9:42:14 AM PDT
by
calex59
(The '86 amnesty put us in the toilet, now the senate wants to flush it!)
To: wagglebee
Hidee hey, hidee ho,
Denny Hastert's gotta.
...along with a long list of other lords and ladies(?) (How 'bout McKinney to start?)
12
posted on
07/23/2006 9:44:34 AM PDT
by
stboz
To: wagglebee
"...Justice Department cannot randomly and wantonly search lawmakers' offices"
___________________________
Hey Denny, that's why it's called a warrant you DNC water boy. What a butt munch.
13
posted on
07/23/2006 9:46:06 AM PDT
by
lp boonie
(Good judgement comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgement)
To: wagglebee
I don't understand all the confusion. All Hastert wants is a 30 to 60 day advance notification of any intended search. After all they are a separate branch of government.
14
posted on
07/23/2006 9:48:46 AM PDT
by
OldEagle
(May you live long enough to hear the legends of your own adventures.)
To: wagglebee
randomly and wantonly searchMr. Hastert's language seems incredibly ignorant and needlessly inflammatory.
If he wants sanctuary he needs a time travel machine and a cathedral.
Otherwise, take it to court. Meet the Press won't be offering any relief.
15
posted on
07/23/2006 9:49:03 AM PDT
by
siunevada
(If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
To: wagglebee
To: wagglebee
I wonder why this makes Hassert so nervous . We are always talking about having a TRANSLUCENT government , operating in the SUNSHINE and so forth and so on , and then these idiots appear . What are you affraid of Denny ?? You work for ME and I expect you to live up to the same standard you have mandated for ME . Get real !!!
17
posted on
07/23/2006 9:52:08 AM PDT
by
lionheart 247365
(( I.S.L.A.M. stands for - Islams Spiritual Leaders Advocate Murder .. .. .. ))
To: OldEagle
How much warning would you expect to get if you were under investigation ??? NOT !!
18
posted on
07/23/2006 9:54:13 AM PDT
by
lionheart 247365
(( I.S.L.A.M. stands for - Islams Spiritual Leaders Advocate Murder .. .. .. ))
To: wagglebee
Hastert said he believed Rep. William Jefferson, D-La., was "in big trouble" and that the House would not be joining in support of Jefferson himself. But he said the House separately might seek to make clear its position that the Justice Department cannot randomly and wantonly search lawmakers' offices. THIS is exactly the kind of thing that makes me detest Politicians. Who the Hell do they think they are that they're above the law? I don't go for two sets of laws. One for Americans and one for Politicians. He makes it look as if Politicians normally have things to hide and he doesn't want any more of them to get caught. Hastert is normally a pretty reasonable man, but he's way out of line on this.
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson