Posted on 07/19/2006 7:58:02 PM PDT by Ooh-Ah
Keep the Kleenex handy....
"For me or my colleagues in the Senate to now question a possible renomination would jeopardize our influence in the United Nations and encourage those who oppose the United States to make Bolton the issue, thereby undermining our policies and agenda."
Where were you Senator, when you were needed?
Oh, good, Bolton's locked up the crybaby vote.
Bolton is GREAT.
George Voinivich believes so strongly in his convictions he CRIES about this and then changes his mind a year later?
Sorry, but pols like Voinivich make me loose breakfast, lunch and dinner. He's appearing as such a Nancy Boy that he may not be able to overcome the suspicion.
He can thank Hillary for that little invasion of privacy, lol!
I got to the Senate meeting late, Biden was making a hissy fit about Bolton, I followed the Dems. I'm sorry.
/translation.
He should have voted for John Bolton when the President first nominated him.
Ditto. Bolton has been our best representative at the UN ever..And Voinovich's performance at his confirmation hearings was a DISGRACE. Better late than never, I suppose.And by this public statement of support I take it he's eating crow because he knows how dead wrong he was.
I agree, to bad some in this "conservative" thing of ours can never ever forgive anyone anything. George Voinovich once upon a time was my mayor. He's a good man. He votes his way for his reasons. Instead of being glad he's come around to our way of thinking, the petty will call him a Rino and snipe at him. I am really beginning to hate being associated with the American Right. I can't go left, but....... something has to give.
Voinovich, as chairman of the Senate Ethics Committee, took a pass on charges against Hillary for the greatest campaign finance fraud in history.
Cry-baby. Go down on your knees and beg for forgiveness.
Did he cry when he wrote this? :-)
Perhaps...maybe, this is quite sincere and the Senator has grown a bit wiser on this issue. We can always hope.
Voinovich may be a disgrace, and he may be giving all the wrong reasons, but it's good news that he's saying this. It seems to indicate that the Dems don't want to take the political damage that would be result from blocking his confirmation.
And, by the way, he's right about one thing. You don't undermine the President in a time of war. Too bad the Dems ignore that principle most of the time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.