Posted on 07/19/2006 4:09:03 PM PDT by Albion Wilde
WHO MEET A MENSCH SAY "I SURRENDER" IN PERFECT FRENCH BURMA SHAVE
PINK IS PRETTY ON A DOLL BUT CHOCOLATE CHIPS LOOK BEST OF ALL BURMA SHAVE
PEDAL PUSHERS IN SHOCKING PINK MAKE DESERT CAMMIES LOOK LIKE MINK BURMA SHAVE
FALCON DRIVERS IN THE SKY BLEW THE Z-MAN EIGHT MILES HIGH BURMA SHAVE
KEEP AWAY FOLKS WHO'D TAKE YOUR RIGHTS AWAY BURMA SHAVE
GLOBE AND ANCHOR "INTERFERE" WITH FOLKS WHO'D BRING THEIR CAR BOMBS HERE BURMA SHAVE
IF ABU AYMAN BOUGHT A PACKET CODE PINK WOULD RAISE AN AWFUL RACKET BURMA SHAVE
IF FOR VIRGINS YOU ARE HOT JUST HOLD STILL FOR THE LITTLE RED DOT BURMA SHAVE
WHEN FIRST HE SAW A GREEN BERET BURMA SHAVE
GIRLS IN PINK
GLOBE AND ANCHOR
OLD OSAMA RAN AWAY
lentulusgracchus, those sign ideas are terrific! Thanks for posting!
Alright! Got here via the newer topic about the sign vandal.
Oh come on now TR, truth is truth and a little humor helps.
It must be a north-south thing. We in the south refrain from personal comments, especially towards the opposition.
link: http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20060726/capt.3429e74654f24bae9f9c5a47755601ac.us_iraq_protestor_dclb01.jpg?x=380&y=298&sig=QIwLaD9_pgWO00K4T1c5Ow--
Having lived and having relatives in both north and south, I agree; it's a north-south thing. There are advantages and disadvantages to both ways. The northern candor can keep the air cleared and help people grow, but too much bluntness can damage people's feelings who work together or have to be in the same family. The southern way can keep relations smooth and encourage stable communities, but at times it can be untrustworthy, such as the smile to someone's face and the slice-up behind the back; worse, it can be quite damaging to the inner self of the person who denies outrages and offenses in order to appear polite.
In Code Pink's case, there is no parallel whatsoever to sparing the feelings of one's mother. Hopefully, your mother is not dedicated to your community's defeat, demoralization, overthrow and submission, as are the Code Pinks.
Code Pink's leaders are paid Communist or Green Party agitators who have brazenly lowered the tone of politics throughout the Bush administration, such as their frequent disruptions of solemn events like the Inaugural, various meetings in the Capital (like the one the other day with the Iraqi head of state), the State of the Union Address, press conferences with the Vice President and the Secretary of Defense -- you name it. They support the politics of political indoctrination in schools to make them "safe" for "gay kids", but they have made the city of Washington an unsafe place for the elected officials on whom the nation depends for its safety to live in, by holding demonstrations at the official's personal residences.
They are hardened operatives who use naive lefties nostalgic for the 60s as human shields -- even rounding up people from homeless shelters to populate their agitprop activities. Their phony demonstrations are not about the war, they are about disrupting the free-market democratic republican system and replacing it with totalitarian socialism.
Trust me, their leaders richly deserve the heat. And the mindless tools who can't take it just may become discouraged from coming back to aim their indecency at our wounded soldiers and their families -- and then claim to "support the troops." As we say in the Border States, that's b******t! Should we respond, "Why, bless your heart, I don't smell a thing!"?
Here's one of them now, in the middle with the white shirt, two weeks back, when he realized the person taking his picture was a wounded soldier (Elijah Allen) from Walter Reed:
No, that's Medea Benjamin, one of the primary national leaders of Code Pink.
Ping to post 109.
Marvelous!!!!
How would a southern lady express herself regarding the behavior of Medea Benjamin insulting all Americans by disrupting the Speech of the invited Prime Minister of Iraq to the Joint Session of Congress in one of the most hallowed rooms of our country? I am sincerely interested in learning, because I am not in favor of name-calling, as a general rule.
Remember I am asking you about people who stood in front of the entrance to Walter Reed Army Medical Center with signs that said "maimed for a lie," and similar messages. They began their "vigils" to coincide with the time that transport ambulances would arrive from medivac planes that had landed at Andrews Air Force Base.
Never Again!
Bears repeating...thank you!
You know that and I know that, but the casual passerby DOESN'T know that.
So, you can solve the dilemma by adding one more sign:
their hearts! |
And again, and again till it sinks in.
[Mrs T]
Exactly as you have done (up until now).
The four corner control and your predicatable presence is enough.
As far as clarifying their infiltration for passerbys, you could put up a sign that says "Leaving American Zone: Entering hippy anti-war protestor zone." Or some such.
What dilemma? We don't see a dilemma, TaxRelief. It's usually the left that misunderestimates the American people.
Your dogged insistence that you are right and we are wrong is starting to remind me of that Saturday Night Live episode with Phil Hartman as the washed-up actor and Jon Lovitz as the movie executive trying to tell him he's not going to be rehired. After the executive tells him he's fired six or seven times, the actor still says, ""Give it to me straight!":
I've given it to you straight, and so have others. It's good to know you are not one of the hypocritical Southerners, but please direct your criticisms at those who have the fundamental indecency to protest the war at a military hospital.
Should I come to tomprrow's get together in my dark suit, in case she needs to be removed again?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.