Posted on 07/18/2006 1:26:54 PM PDT by RWR8189
Do you agree with the Senator that abortion can be justified on arbitrary "quality of life" grounds?
Do you agree with the Senator that abortion can be justified on arbitrary "quality of life" grounds?
Do you agree with the Senator that abortion can be justified for "fetal abnormality"?
Do you agree with the Senator that life begins at the commencement of brainwaves?
EV: "George Allen is wrong on abortion."
NARAL: "George Allen is wrong on abortion."
See a pattern?
Senator Allen's "virtual fence"? It remains unfunded.
You have a pretty good supply of red herrings.
Do you agree with the Senator on the abortion questions I asked in my last post?
George Allen voted for the funding.
Any time you're around, the fishing is excellent.
He does have a pretty lightweight record for passing any legislation, much less conservative legislation.
Do you agree with him on the abortion questions I asked?
Not around here. FReepers are pretty good at spotting your misdirection tactics.
Perhaps, but unlike any candidate you've ever supported he's been elected Delegate, Congressman, Governor and Senator.
Do you carry your NARAL card with you? You must since you agree with them on the issues.
Odd though, you're the only one who seems to disagree with me. While those who know what a sham you are are can't keep a list because there are so many of us.
Trying to make stuff up about me doesn't help you, CS.
Do you agree with the Senator that abortion is okay for "fetal abnormality"?
Really, it's an easy question.
In two interviews, he (George Allen) called the current budget "very tight and taut."
Do you agree with him?
Another easy question for you.
I'm not the one who needs help.
Allen's record may disappoint those looking for a more conservative successor to President Bush. As a Senate candidate, he supported an increase in the federal minimum wage. TAS's Washington Prowler also reported at the time that Allen did not impress a Club for Growth meeting looking for a "Reaganesque economic speech." One member said, "Allen was terrible. He was running away from every conservative issue you could think of."
Do you want a 2008 presidential nominee who "runs away from every conservative issue you could think of", even when among conservatives?
If you're an example of how the Allen camp is going to answer conservatives' legitimate questions, with snotty, juvenile personal attacks, he's doomed.
When a legitimate conservative asks me questions, I'll answer them.
Heck, I've even answered yours. Dozens of times.
But you knew that.
You haven't answered at all, except with personal attacks.
Every FReeper can read the thread and see that.
I have answered questions from legitimate FReepers on this thread. And until I got to know you, I even answered your questions on several other threads.
You just don't like the answers because they don't fit your agenda.
And, apparently, because George Allen never offered you a job.
I don't care if you like George Allen, EV. Really, it's to our benefit.
But I question the motives of a Republican/conservative or whatever your calling yourself these days in trashing the very person he says is a "shoo-in" for the GOP nomination.
Love the guy.
George Allen and Newt Gingrich for his vp
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.