I think it's time to dump all my stock in this company. They've lost their minds. I realize it costs resources to prosecute the small shoplifter, but if you let people get away with stealing the small stuff, what do they go after next?
1 posted on
07/13/2006 5:44:27 AM PDT by
Ptaz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: Ptaz
Pardon one offense, and you encourage the commission of many. Publilius Syrus
52 posted on
07/13/2006 7:01:16 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: Ptaz
Until now, they said, Wal-Mart was the exception. They would arrest somebody for stealing a pair of socks, said Chief Zofchak in South Strabane Township. I felt we were spending an inordinate amount of time just dealing with Wal-Mart.
I would call Chief Zofchak a real jeak. They are not dealing with the store, they are dealing with the thieves. If they don't like dealing with law breakers, why in the hell are they in law enforcement, (except for their pension)?
63 posted on
07/13/2006 8:32:37 AM PDT by
Mark was here
(How can they be called "Homeless" if their home is a field?.)
To: Ptaz
will no longer prosecute first-time thieves unless they are between 18 and 65 and steal merchandise worth at least $25 Shoplifters between the ages of 18 and 65 will still be prosecuted. But the very young and the very old will get a free pass. Hmm.
To: Ptaz
>They've lost their minds. I realize it costs resources to prosecute the small shoplifter, but if you let people get away with stealing the small stuff, what do they go after next?
Don't worry. After
the Muslims win, we will all
be living under
Sharia. And then
the scummy thieves will get theirs . . .
(After a few years
we can all revolt,
restore our freedoms, after
clearing out the scum.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson