Posted on 07/10/2006 8:53:40 PM PDT by LdSentinal
Here is her very first post to PW, on July 3:
Are you COMPLETELY out of your mind? Do you really not understand that George Dubya Bush threatens the security of the US a trillion times more than the NYT by continuing to order the occupation of Iraq?
Got neurons?
She came looking for a fight, and got her nose bloodied.
Thanks. That was very informative. Not too bright, is she.
I, for one, believe there is some imbalance involved here, if not a full-fledged mental illness. First, she obviously has serious issues in dealing with conservatives, or those with opinions that differ from hers. Second, she apparently has issues with men in general. This can be seen in her sexual preference as well as her combativeness with the UCLA professor, Jeff Goldstein, etc. Finally, she has issues with Christians and possibly Jews. Exactly where all these 'phobias' come from (if I use the proper term), I can't say. I'm not educated to say. Interestingly, she is (at least she should be based on her education). Regarding her decision making and whatever point she's trying to make, I don't think she's purposely trying to make any specific point (other than she's superior to anyone on the right). I believe she has made a decision in life. That is that she enjoys 'taking it to' the right and intends to operate on this level. I believe this was a conscious decision on her part. As to consequences, I doubt she's given that much, if any, thought. I believe she sees herself as right, that the majority of Americans will agree with her and that repercussions will ultimately be minimal at worst. This, of course, is all speculation on my part.
Lastly, I'm not sure she is functioning as a normal person in the real world. Oh, I'm sure she believes she is but that is ultimately irrelevant.
Too many issues here at play and I'm certainly not educated enough to work them out. All I can do, as others, is speculate. But this whole disgusting situation not only opens a window into the irrational mind, but into that of many on the unhinged left in general. She is NOT unique in that regard.
Yesterday, I went through a number of the replies to her outbreak that she didn't remove from her website. The one that sticks in my mind most (I believe it was on her site but could have been posted elsewhere) was a reply from someone who claimed to be a member of the 'progressive' community in Eugene, OR - where Fritsh claims to now live, or is moving to . Fritsh had stated that all she now wants is to become a member of the progressive left in Eugene and live comfortable (or words to that effect). Well, this replier flat stated that Fritsh was unhinged in her view, and the progressive community would want no part of her, thank you anyway. I believe Ms Fritsh has dug her hole and is going to find just how deep it is very quickly.
The post she most adamently argues against is the one about french kissing the child. Jeff Goldstein, in rebuttal, posts the entire sequence of posts, then also posts a graphic of the IT server timeline. She has no wiggle room on that.
And, I think you're right about this being something to be debated for years to come. Like it or not, she's become a part of Internet/bloger lore. A number of those who responded to her outburst at her site alluded to this. They told her about how this is 'out there' now, it isn't going away ever, and could well impact her locating another job; even going so far as to describe employers using Google to do searches on prospective employees. Whether that's true or not, I don't know. However, if one had a rational mind you'd think it would give them great concern. So far, it doesn't seem so with her. That, to me, is telling!
Excellent point. I think you could even delete the "I'm not sure part."
There are leftists that I respect, but disagree with. They would run like crazy from this kind of stuff. What frightens me the most, frankly, is that she was teaching AND that she is raising a child.
I'm not so sure about the child. While one appears in the kitchen photo along with her 'partner', there's no direct evidence the child belongs to either of them. At least I hope the child doesn't!
As for her teaching, she had an adjunct professor's job at UofA for which she was paid $32+K annually. Interestingly, there are two other people at UofA with her last name, one of which in in administration. She had earlier worked at the University of Oregon at Eugene, but lost her job there and wasn't given tenure. Apparently, her teaching career is far less than stellar.
One further interesting item is that on yesterday's DUFunnies thread about this very subject, a poster referenced an evaluation at 'RateMyProfessor' about Ms Frisch (or however it's spelled). The poster at RMP took her to task, stating that she only wants to talk about Bush, politics, etc. I just went to RMP to get the exact quote but it is now listed as 'under review'. I personally saw it there yesterday so I wonder if she's had some hand in having it removed.
I'm not so sure about the child. While one appears in the kitchen photo along with her 'partner', there's no direct evidence the child belongs to either of them. At least I hope the child doesn't!
As for her teaching, she had an adjunct professor's job at UofA for which she was paid $32+K annually. Interestingly, there are two other people at UofA with her last name, one of which in in administration. She had earlier worked at the University of Oregon at Eugene, but lost her job there and wasn't given tenure. Apparently, her teaching career is far less than stellar.
One further interesting item is that on yesterday's DUFunnies thread about this very subject, a poster referenced an evaluation at 'RateMyProfessor' about Ms Frisch (or however it's spelled). The poster at RMP took her to task, stating that she only wants to talk about Bush, politics, etc. I just went to RMP to get the exact quote but it is now listed as 'under review'. I personally saw it there yesterday so I wonder if she's had some hand in having it removed.
Excellent point, thanks for pointing that out.
I personally saw it there yesterday so I wonder if she's had some hand in having it removed.
Did you see her request to Goldstein about removing her pictures from his siteand then her response? Fascinating to say the least.
The leftists didn't see a problem. Late term abortions are OK until the child reaches 13 years old.
Oh, dear.
I do that just about every day, here.
In fact:
There I go again.
Since the little girl is wearing a (gasp) dress, AND it is pink, I am hoping she belongs to someone more normal than this
wacko.
Looks like you're the stalker, debbie...and quite the INSANE stalker, at that.
(BTW: The issue is whatever we choose it to be.
(That chick's nuts.)
That was one of the points I made earlier on this thread as well as on DUFunnies earlier this a.m. I think we're all hoping the little girl belongs to someone else.
Also, here's the link to the DUFunnies post about the 'RateMyProfessor'comment: DUmmie Funnies.
It's post #71, and the actual student remark is: "She repeatedly veers off the subject into hate-filled rants against Christians, President Bush and men. She has no business in a classroom."
I read somewhere on her blog somebody justifying her bitterness as including her being childless and now partnerless as well. That pic may have been taken during better times.
Now that's interesting. Can you find the actual post? Elsewhere on this thread, the partner is referred to as Cecile Mckee or McKnee, I believe. Somewhere, I saw that the photo was dated 2004 or 2005. I believe it came from an article in an Arizona newspaper.
Interesting also, is that someone on this thread (I believe - if not it had to be on the DUFunnies thread) that the partner was now going to seek employment to provide benefits for 'her' partner, meaning Deborah Frisch.
Frisch herself, to my knowledge, has never made any comments about her partner or the child in the photo. So, all this comes second hand and, for that reason, should be taken as unconfirmed. Anyway, that actual post would be helpful if you can find it.
i,m going thru all her replies again now. I hope i didn't read it on the one other linked blog i read. I'll keep looking but i did just come across this gem again.....
"PLEASE stay the hell out of Eugene, and Oregon. We have been building a solid Progressive movement here for many years and your ilk ARE NOT INVITED. You are at best severly mentally ill, at worst at NAZI REPUBLISCUM PLANT. S-T-A-Y-O-U-T. I have written to the editors at the Register-Guard, the Willamette Week, the Oregonian and other indie papers and alerted them to your actions and to attempt to dissociate you from the Progressive/Democratic movement in this state. STAY OUT.
Posted by erivet at July 9, 2006 01:30 AM"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.