Posted on 07/09/2006 6:01:09 PM PDT by george76
Kerry Murphy Healey, the lt gov, is running as the sole GOP candidate. Christy Mihos is running as an independent;
Reilly, Patrick, and Gabrieli as Dems. There's a chance
Healey and Mihos will split the anti-Dem-hack vote and a Dem
will wind up in the corner office again...
>>But in 1982, Dukakis, in a tough fight to regain the governor's office, ran several strongly negative ads against Governor Edward J. King, a Democrat, including one that claimed taxpayers were paying a ``corruption tax" during King's term. Another Dukakis ad, which was quickly pulled, featured a man calling King a ``son-of-a bleep."
Yes. And wasn't the Dukakis-for-prez campaign partially derailed by the Willie Horton ad? There's a "negative ad"
for you (a FACTUAL one!)
from Wikipedia: Horton "is a convicted felon who was the subject of a Massachusetts weekend furlough program that released him while serving a life sentence for murder, without the possibility of parole, providing him the opportunity to commit a rape and armed robbery. A political advertisement during the 1988 U.S. Presidential race was critical of the Democratic nominee and Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis for his support of the program...
"There is some disagreement about whether the Republicans first brought up Willie Horton in the campaign, or whether in fact Al Gore did. Some believe that Horton's name first surfaced during the general election. They say that Senator Al Gore raised only the general issue of the furlough program during the 1988 Democratic presidential primary. In June of 1988, after Dukakis had clinched the Democratic Party nomination, Republican candidate George H.W. Bush seized on the Horton case, bringing it up repeatedly in campaign speeches. Bush's campaign manager, Lee Atwater, bragged that "by the time this election is over, Willie Horton will be a household name." Media consultant Roger Ailes was reported to remark "the only question is whether we depict Willie Horton with a knife in his hand or without it."
So Dukakis knows well about "attack ads".
This is a picture of _the last Democrat to be elected governor in Massachusetts_, way back in '86. Even my ultra-liberal home state has SOME sense!
Thanks! Is Healey really considered an opponent? I've heard very little about her.
As for Willie Horton, despite the doubt shown in the quote, it WAS Algor who first used the issue against Dukakis in the primaries- then the press all blamed it on the republicans.
of course they are only talking about attack ads on each other, they will still use attack ads on republicans, but really why do the democrats keep trotting out these losers for advice?
I mean if dukakis had a clue how to win wouldn't he have won, I mean they keep using bob shrum and the guy is like 0-10
thank god they are so stupid...
plus they still blame bush 43 for willie horton even though it was al gore that brought it up in the democratic primary
Without attack ads against Bush, Cheney and Rice, they have not ads which sponsor their ideas, their issues or agendas. They have nothing. What blather!
She's kind of laid low--preferring not to take part in debates till her Dem. opponent is officially chosen. If elected she would be the first woman to be elected in her own right as Governor--as opposed to Jane Swift, who served as acting governor after Cellucci took a job as Amb. to Canada. (Swift's
poll numbers were so low she dropped out of the '02 race
and Mitt Romney became the GOP nominee and, eventual, governor.)
http://www.healeycommittee.com/meet_kerry.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.