Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/06/2006 9:28:25 AM PDT by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: AntiGuv

If Delay runs (and now he probably will), he will win!


54 posted on 07/06/2006 10:28:18 AM PDT by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

If Delay is removed from the ballot, the Dems will have a lot of preprinted signs and flyers they'll have to scrap.


59 posted on 07/06/2006 10:31:50 AM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv
Republicans who have been vying for the seat are Sugar Land lawyer Tom Campbell; state Reps. Charlie Howard or Sugar Land and Robert Talton of Pasadena; state Sen. Mike Jackson of Houston; Houston City Councilwoman Shelley Sekula-Gibbs; Fort Bend County Commissioner Andy Meyers; Sugar Land Mayor David Wallace; retired Air Force Maj. Don Richardson; and former state GOP executive committee member Tim Turner.

I've known Senator Mike Jackson for years...I graduated with his son and was on the swim team with his daughter. Great guy. Hope he wins it!

63 posted on 07/06/2006 10:36:24 AM PDT by Zeppelin (You've been Zarqed !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

Two words: Toricelli/Lautenberg

I know, I know, different rules for different states. But this is just silly. Six months is plenty of time to replace a candidate on the ballot.

It would serve the Donks right if Delay came roaring back and spanked them into oblivion.


65 posted on 07/06/2006 10:39:17 AM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up two (2) seats in the Senate and four (4) seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

I hope he runs and wins and returns to Congress, how's them apples.


76 posted on 07/06/2006 10:49:16 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv
U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks, a Republican appointee, ruled that DeLay must appear on the Nov. 7 ballot as the GOP nominee for the congressional seat that DeLay abandoned last month. Sparks' ruling was confirmed by Texas Democratic Party spokeswoman Amber Moon.

Since when do Democratic Party spokeswomen "confirm" Federal rulings? ;)

98 posted on 07/06/2006 11:26:46 AM PDT by detsaoT (Proudly not "dumb as a journalist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

I would love to see this blow back up in the Dems faces. DeLay should just go into full out re-election mode.

In IL, Lane Evans, who has Parkinsons, resigns like two days AFTER the primary. Now, the candidate gets to be hand-picked, robbing the voters of their say.

I am sick of these underhanded tactics.

If it is indeed TX law, so be it. DeLay should just go for it. Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it- Dems.


101 posted on 07/06/2006 11:29:05 AM PDT by conservativebabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

Watch: this will backfire on the libs. :)


105 posted on 07/06/2006 11:32:21 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of "dependence on government"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

Since Delay should have NEVER be run out by the Republican establishment, I'm fine with the ruling.

IMO, they SHOULD be forced to allow Delay to run. Either let him run or give up the seat as a consequnece for being backstabbing spineless RINO's.

Whether this is legally sound, I don't know. And don't particularly care at this point. Earle's abusing the law anyway.


110 posted on 07/06/2006 11:40:10 AM PDT by Soul Seeker (Kobach: Amnesty is going from an illegal to a legal position, without imposing the original penalty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv
They said DeLay also could not withdraw from the race because state law does not allow a party's nominee to withdraw when another political party also has a nominee.

Not being a Texan, I can't claim to understand the state's laws. But the law as quoted above makes little sense. Suppose a candidate wins his/her primary, then is diagnosed with a serious illness -- or commits a serious crime -- and cannot campaign. Does Texas law nevertheless insist that candidate can't withdraw from the race?

I understand the need for stability in the electoral process, but a blanket law that says no withdrawals are possible after another party has a nominee seems to defy common sense.

113 posted on 07/06/2006 11:43:13 AM PDT by Wolfstar (Where you go with me, heaven will always be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

stupid activist judge.


114 posted on 07/06/2006 11:43:40 AM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

Hopefully DeLay will use some of his idle time return the favor and campaign for Tom Tancredo.


123 posted on 07/06/2006 11:48:46 AM PDT by CWOJackson (Support The Troops-Support The Mission--Please Visit http://www.irey.com--&--Vets4Irey.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stevie_d_64

Ping. . .


133 posted on 07/06/2006 12:05:12 PM PDT by Flyer (Don't question the questioner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

He was an idiot for not dropping out before the primary.


141 posted on 07/06/2006 12:24:33 PM PDT by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

Question of the day:

Do Democrats LOVE Tom DeLay?


176 posted on 07/06/2006 1:40:42 PM PDT by Danae (Anál nathrach, orth' bháis's bethad, do chél dénmha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

>>Sparks ruling halts the process of replacing DeLay on the ballot, but the GOP is expected to appeal the decision to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.<<

Does anybody know the 5th circuit's bias?


202 posted on 07/06/2006 3:02:53 PM PDT by gondramB (Unity of freedom has never relied upon uniformity of opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

There wasn't any reason for Delay to retire unless he was guilty. If his name is on the ballot and he wins, that's a mandate of the people and he should continue to serve.

He should want to come back tougher than ever just to hand the DUmocrats their hats for a few more cycles!


206 posted on 07/06/2006 3:43:05 PM PDT by RasterMaster ("Big Tents" you get Clowns & Circus Freaks! The road to HELL is paved with LIEberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

Let's say that DeLay campaigns and gets elected, then chooses to not take his seat. Who nominates his replacement? The Governor (a Republican)? That wouldn't be a bad thing at all. Run on the popular DeLay name and reputation in a Republican friendly area, then replace DeLay with a choice which DeLay and the Guv like.

Screw off Dims!


247 posted on 07/06/2006 7:49:28 PM PDT by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv

Now Delay has no choice but to run. :-)


249 posted on 07/06/2006 8:00:53 PM PDT by Ma3lst0rm (When all else fails for a liberal there is always room for more whining.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv
If you are a donk, and a weak candidate, you can get replaced at will, however, the same rules don't apply for pubbies...

Something is rotten in Denmark, and it is not fish...
257 posted on 07/06/2006 8:31:21 PM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson