Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexico: On the brink of Marxism
WorldNetDaily ^ | June 30, 2006 | David T. Pyne

Posted on 07/01/2006 11:52:27 AM PDT by Mount Athos

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: MediaMole

he meant "Punch-o Villain" i think...


41 posted on 07/01/2006 6:31:17 PM PDT by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kcar
The United States did enforce a boycott of Mexican oil for thirty years.

Slightly off-topic, but no, despite some hotheaded calls for a boycott by some in the U.S., and a short diplomatic break with the British, and a few months when the Mexicans played hardball, sending a few tankerloads to the Germans (real hardball, given Mexico's officially anti-fascist stance), and threatening to hire Soviet engineers, everything went relatively smoothly. For one thing, the U.S. -- and the British needed the oil. Even before Mexico entered the war (after tankers were sunk by U-boats in May 1942), it was supplying oil to the allies. After entering the war, much of the nationalization debt was written off in exchange for selling the oil below market prices.

Paying compensation was made a matter of national pride. A propaganda photo at the time shows the first lady contributing her wedding ring to a collection raised to pay the bills.

International arbitration set the final bill and terms of repayment. The U.S. and Dutch owners were paid off ahead of schedule, the British (being jerks about the whole thing) had to wait -- but still a year ahead of schedule.

42 posted on 07/02/2006 12:42:52 AM PDT by rpgdfmx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

It's scary how much Mexico's future effects America's two most important issues: Immigration and energy. Why, oh why, did the most retarded philosophies head towards Mexico?...Had Britain been their first, we'd probably see a better country out of Mexico.


43 posted on 07/02/2006 4:08:54 PM PDT by Rick_Michael (Look at profile for current ways to deal with illegals immigration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis

10 to 15 years ago! Wow, you love to watch ice melt.


44 posted on 07/03/2006 3:12:58 PM PDT by Sam Ketcham (Amnesty means vote dilution, more poverty aid and we will be bankrupt! Or are we already?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
Well I'll throw a little more ice your way for you to watch melt. Eisenhower and Nixon BOTH had the testicular fortitude to order the illegals out; the US sent Jack Pershing into Mexico to deal with armed intrusion, as opposed the lack of inactivity when Mexican military and / or drug traffickers regularly foray into the US these days. Philosophize all you want, but it doesn't get the job done.

For example. the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) states that from 1925-1965, immigration averaged about a 178,000 each year. Since then, the average is about 1 million, plus illegal immigrants". The CIS shows a direct correlation between increased legal and illegal immigration.

There are 6 Billion "poor" in the world. If we continue to let them come at will, we will be among the poor. We already have taken in a number approximating 10% of the citizens of Mexico!


Want to know the numbers and who allowed this situation and who is for increased immigration? A few of the References: http://www.cis.org/
and http://profiles.numbersusa.com/
45 posted on 07/03/2006 3:25:40 PM PDT by Sam Ketcham (Amnesty means vote dilution, more poverty aid and we will be bankrupt! Or are we already?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Sam Ketcham
10 to 15 years ago! Wow, you love to watch ice melt.

I'm just going back to when we started building fences and increasing spending and resources devoted to border control. It was a slow steady increase, but it HAS had an effect. We know have far fewer illegal border crossings. Problem is we have more illegals because we have fewer return crossings.

The vast majority of illegals from the South used to come here to work seasonally. Most had no intention to stay. Now more stay because it's too difficult and expensive to cross two or three times a year.

46 posted on 07/03/2006 3:29:08 PM PDT by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

With all the wisdom of hindsight, I've watched the crisis in Mexico blossom over the last 30 years-- yes,longer than that, but that's the limit of my personal observation.

How we could sit on our hands while this incredibly corrupt poverty-ridden wreck of a country needed a big push toward putting its own economy on the road to effective capitalism was a huge mystery to me. Clearly they were going to pour over our borders if their own country didn't provide them a means of support. But no, the wealthy autocrats in Mexico who run everything have kept their foot on the neck of the people without ceasing, turning them toward the USA, communism, anything that offers the PEOPLE some hope, no matter how misguided.

Mexico better get busy cleaning up its own carcass of a country and creating a middle class. And I'm afraid we're going to get stuck helping them one way or another.....a thousand ways would be more accurate.


47 posted on 07/03/2006 3:30:19 PM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench
We also let them close our hospitals, undermine our children's education, raise our taxes and insurance rates, drive down our wages, ignore our laws, steal our identities, etc

And steal thousands of dollars in jewelry out of my home. Cleaned me out. They're here in this very private island community because builders hire them for less than they'd have to pay American construction workers.

No difference to the buyer, of course, on the exorbitant price of new homes. Everybody's economic system is going to hell in a hand basket, capitalism right along with Marxism.

48 posted on 07/03/2006 3:35:58 PM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
I do not deny the parallel. If we cut their services, hopefully they will self deport.
49 posted on 07/03/2006 4:12:04 PM PDT by Sam Ketcham (Amnesty means vote dilution, more poverty aid and we will be bankrupt! Or are we already?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson