Posted on 06/30/2006 11:57:28 AM PDT by annie laurie
While alive, those creatures were less likely to wander far from the site.Particularly after they got stuck in the bleepin' tar.
As a certified Grammar Nazi, I must point out that "only" means ONLY. The ONLY one. You cannot have "one of the only," although you can have "one of the few."
Drives me nuts when I see bad grammar in the headlines!
Annie, as one of the only people who posts GGG-appropriate topics, I'd like to thank you for following the FR rules regarding posting threads under their original headlines.
So an archaeologist find the archaeologists and the Paleontologists will study his pet dog and straw hat?
Particularly after they got stuck in the bleepin' tar.
You could call it one of the longest pit stops on record.
[rimshot!]
I lost my Top Flite rubber band airplane there many, many, years ago. Always wondered what they'd makeof that.
It does seem to be quite the trend these days; just a few days ago there was a headline (on msnbc.com, I believe) which read "loosing their luster" instead of "losing their luster."
A real teeth-grinder, that one! ;-)
You're certainly welcome :) And may I say thank you for all the work that you do with the GGG list (not to mention the X-planets list) :)
And thanks to you and Bernard Marx for the chuckles in 21 & 25 ;-)
I lost my Top Flite rubber band airplane there many, many, years ago. Always wondered what they'd make of that.
There was a VERY funny book written on just that subject (i.e., how will archaeologists of the future interpret findings from our era?) ... it's called Motel of the Mysteries by David Macaulay.
Good stuff :)
(SC, I pinged you as well, because if you haven't read it yet, you should; I have a feeling you'd get a kick out of it).
Maybe the shock of the government releasing proof that dinosaurs and people lived at the same time was to much?
Mark
This is just too good to be true! lol
___________________________________________
To: annie laurie
As a certified Grammar Nazi, I must point out that "only" means ONLY. The ONLY one. You cannot have "one of the only," although you can have "one of the few."
Drives me nuts when I see bad grammar in the headlines!
22 posted on 06/30/2006 8:39:47 PM PDT by Hetty_Fauxvert (Kelo must GO!! ..... http://sonoma-moderate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
____________________________________________________________
To: annie laurie
Annie, as one of the only people who posts GGG-appropriate topics, I'd like to thank you for following the FR rules regarding posting threads under their original headlines.
23 posted on 06/30/2006 9:04:37 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Wednesday, June 21, 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
Joan doing reports
live and looking exactly
the way she looks now . . .
Glad to see that I'm not one of the only people annoyed by that grating term.
If you go to Iraan in west Texas, you can see the statues of Ally Oop and Dinny. I've got photos to prove it.
(off topic)Thank you. One of my pet peeves is misused words. These are obvious in how they do not fit the context of the sentence. Sometimes you will see something like "won of the only". When I see something like this, it tells me the author only spell checked the article and didn't bother to thoroughly proofread it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.