Guest Commentary: Moving forward (co-founders of anti-David Parker hate group)

Your support of leftist viewpoints on "homosexuality" has been completely contained and your agenda campaign on FR rendered irrelevant.

I'm just so sad...

But then I support no leftist viewpoints on homosexuality on FR, and never have. I support the truth, which, although you may, I do not, consider leftist. I think my point has been made by me and others concerning the antics of Mr. Parker. That you continue in your support of him after the truth of May 17 has been confirmed says a lot more about you than me. It's interesting that Parker does not debate me, but leaves it to you.

You will continue threatening all conservatives here who value truth over lies, and many do move on, leaving you to rule over your homosexuality domain. I don't care about most of your issues including your theories about cause and effect, but I do care when you use a fictitious event concerning a seven year old boy as a springboard for your crusade.

Rather than wait for the next "Parker" topic to contribute irrelevantly to or attempt to hijack I suggest you just accept the reality of your position and move on.

I would suggest it's you who are hijacking the thread, when you refuse to discuss the issue of the thread but immediately move to your crusade, having nothing to do with the issue. As long as you keep hijacking the Parker threads, I will keep pointing out the truth of the story to all who read. As for all of your other threads, unless they involve the marriage amendment, you needn't worry about me pointing out your usually fallacious arguments. That's for others to debate you on. But I strongly urge you to leave the Parker threads for the Parker issue.

If not that -then at least try bugging me less repeatedly with your whining over things I consider irrelevant to my agenda and purpose for following such specific stories -opposition to the homosexualization of society...

Since you seem incapable or unwilling to debate the issues you raise, I'd hardly charge anyone with whining if I were you. As for your agenda, fine. It is part of Free Republic's agenda also, and though most of us here don't live it 24/7 as do you, we are supportive to varying degrees. Still, what you have never understood here is that your threads are not sacrosanct. FR is not a pulpit, but a forum for the expression of conservative thought and debate. As I have suggested to you before, if you are unable to support a position, ask some of your ping list for help. Threatening everyone who questions anything you post does not do much for the promotion of your agenda. It simply makes you look intellectually impotent.

" Neil Tassel, the Parkers’ legal counsel, said Jacob Parker and the student had “been friends and continue to be friends,” after the confrontation. Tassel said the Parkers were notified of the altercation and were content with the investigation and follow-up by the school. Tassel said the Parkers’ only concern was that the incident, while triggered by a disagreement in the cafeteria, may have resulted from the “atmosphere created by adults on the outside.”

Good find, MACVSOG68. I hadn't realized that there were freepers who were still perpetuating the lies told by Parker about this story. Well, I guess even freepers don't want to let the truth get in the way of their agenda.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.