Posted on 06/29/2006 9:00:59 AM PDT by MNJohnnie
onyx!!
I haven't seen you in a while...good to see you at least bump the thread.
Are you doing well??
How many times has she fallen asleep on the bench? That is not the first.
DID he really? LOL...missed that..
I had to run out..missed the president and the first 25 mins of Rush :(
Bush can hold these people for has along has he wants.
There will be... i'm bringing illegals and dead folks; I may run by the nursing home and the abandoned building on the way as well... depends on the weather.
new Freeperism.
Yep..a news Nump could be hugh and series...
"The court's evident belief that it is qualified to pass on the "[m]ilitary necessity" ... of the Commander in Cheif's decision to employ a particular form of force against our enemies is so antithetical to our constitutional structure that it simply cannot go unanswered. I respectfully dissent."
These callers are great today. Let's have these Dems give constitutional rights to our enemy. 'Bullseye' on the Democrat party (and some RINOs) is right. The American people will be appalled.
Fox interviewed Voinivich about this..and when Bill Hemmer asked him about Congress getting together and writing legislation to help...
All Voinivich wanted to do was talk about how badly GITMO has hurt America's prestige and reputation..and how it needs to be closed...pfffft
Hat tip to Freeper Tort_feasor who is posting these items on another thread.
Justice Thomas Dissent;
"The Court’s evident belief that it is qualified to pass on the “[m]ilitary necessity,” ante, at 48, of the Commander in Chief’s decision to employ a particular form of force against our enemies is so antithetical to our constitutional structure that it simply cannot go unanswered. I respectfully dissent."
More Thomas hitting the libs upside the head.
"But this suggestion betrays the plurality’s unfamiliarity with the realities of warfare and its willful blindness to our precedents. The starting point of the present conflict (or indeed any conflict) is not determined by congressional enactment, but rather by the initiation of hostilities. See Prize Cases, supra, at 668 (recognizing that war may be initiated by “invasion of a foreign nation,” and that such initiation, and the President’s response, usually precedes congressional action)."
Here he calls them stupid;
"And the plurality’s unsupportable contrary determination merely confirms that “‘the Judiciary has neither aptitude, facilities nor responsibility’” for making military or foreignaffairs judgments. Hamdi, 542 U. S., at 585 (THOMAS, J., dissenting) (quoting Chicago & Southern Air Lines, 333 U. S., at 111)."
YES! Thanks, sweet you.
I am busy with the two little g-daughters who are here visting me for 5 weeks. Off to the cement pond now with my radio!
Totally cool!
EXACTLY....we need to be more worried about Arlen Specter, than the dems at this point. You can also add McCain, Warner, and Graham to that list.
LOL...Sounds like you are trying to level the playing field.
I know... hilarious.
Explain the law to me. This is congress' perview vs. judical so they sent it back over to them?
Graham is all ready on board on this. He is the one running around the media pushing for Congress to get busy
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.