Skip to comments.
Richard Dawkins: How a Scientist Changed the Way We Think [Book Review]
International Herald Tribune ^
| 28 June 2006
| Nicholas Wade (reviewer)
Posted on 06/28/2006 5:16:22 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
To: PatrickHenry
Guess so, PH. Forgive me. God bless you also, dear Patrick!
41
posted on
06/30/2006 6:49:06 AM PDT
by
betty boop
(The universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose. -J.B.S. Haldane)
To: betty boop; Alamo-Girl; PatrickHenry
Is patrony an aggressive act?...
42
posted on
06/30/2006 7:27:29 AM PDT
by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
To: Dumb_Ox
If you ever heard of the idea of the "meme" (a self replicating bit of information much like a "gene" but normally called an idea) this is where that idea was born. It leads to a whole new way of viewing culture and human thought.
Isn't the idea of the meme a meme in and of itself? If so, how it it any more reliable than any other meme? The entire hypothesis strikes me as worthless for any practical purposes.
43
posted on
06/30/2006 7:34:20 AM PDT
by
DarkSavant
(Grease me up woman!)
To: Alamo-Girl
"What is the origin of the will to live? "
The origin of the will to live is that without you die. That is, without the "will" to live, life becomes extinct.
POC
To: js1138
Are you saying that life is a metaphor? Perhaps as in an illusion, an ephiphenomenon - a secondary phenomenon which cannot cause anything to happen?
To: furball4paws; betty boop; hosepipe
The origin of the will to live is that without you die.
That requires intention - consciousness - decision making - and yet even molecular machinery will struggle to survive after an insult to the physical brain, plants struggle to survive, amoeba etc.
What is the origin of the will to live - or, if you wish to skip ahead, to die?
To: Alamo-Girl
"Wanting" to live is a figure of speech. I'll leave it to the grammarians to say which one.
47
posted on
06/30/2006 8:57:25 AM PDT
by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
Skipping-ahead placemarker.
48
posted on
06/30/2006 9:22:41 AM PDT
by
balrog666
(There is no freedom like knowledge, no slavery like ignorance. - Ali ibn Ali-Talib)
To: js1138
Thank you for your reply! Feel free to substitute a word of your liking for "want" in the phrase "want to live". The question remains, what is its origin?
To: Alamo-Girl
At what level do you want an explanation? If the explanation is presented at the level of chemistry, it is reductionism. If the explanation is presented at the level of population genetics it is a just so story.
We have been around and around with this. Science investigates phenomena with the tools available at the time, and scientific explanations are sometimes just formal descriptions of relationships among phenomena.
There is nothing in the behavior of genes that suggests that their behavior can't be explained with the methods of biochemistry. There is nothing about the frequency or distribution of alleles that suggests anything is at work other than selection.
50
posted on
06/30/2006 10:10:05 AM PDT
by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
To: js1138; betty boop; hosepipe
How strange. I made a reply to you - I thought - and looking back now, it is not here. I must have mashed "x" instead of "post" LOL!
At what level do you want an explanation?
I'd prefer ontological though it will be hard for us to navigate the "what is all that there is" part of agreeing to terms.
To: Alamo-Girl
No, I disagree. It only involves selection - Live or Die.
To: furball4paws
I don't know if you meant that to be funny, but it really tickles me!
To: Alamo-Girl
I don't think science is going to help you there.
54
posted on
06/30/2006 1:46:50 PM PDT
by
js1138
(Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
To: Alamo-Girl
I'm glad to see you laughing.
To: js1138
If science had all the answers, that might be disturbing. LOL!
To: furball4paws
Good! Thank you for your replies!
To: furball4paws
Thanks!
I've "re-girded my loins" in preparation for battle."
Actually, I grew weary of the "same old--same old."
58
posted on
07/04/2006 2:09:40 PM PDT
by
Rudder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson