Coulter: N.Y. Times Committed 'Treason'

NewsMax ^ | 6/29/06 | Phil Brennan

[R.W.Ratikal]

The Bush administration is not going to prosecute the NYT for a complicated set of reasons. Onc is that the NYT is a part of the one worlder group that Bush belongs to.

Ask yourself why nothing has been done by Republicans to reduce the size of government; cut spending, cut taxes (for real); kick out the United Nations; repel the Mexican invasion; restore constitutional rule of law; fight the left; etc., even though they have been in power for over a decade.

It's them against us Americans.

[Jameison]

"The federal statute on treason, 18 USC 2381, provides in relevant part: 'Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States ... adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, "

Now that's the part I like.. the "shall suffer death" part.
I wanna see Bill Keller hanging from the end of a very strong rope.

[Jameison]

" Onc is that the NYT is a part of the one worlder group that Bush belongs to."

Huh?
The Slimes and President Bush are in some secret group to take over the world?
Riiiiight!
Umm..did you take your meds this evening yet?

[billbears]

Well simpletons that look to Coulter for guidance probably couldn't do much better so I'll take that as your best....

[Jameison]

"someone stupid enough to make statements that her " only regret with [Oklahoma City bomber] Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times building."

In view of the treason that is carried out practically every day by The Slimes, and the determination of The Slimes to make sure Al Quaeda kills as many of us here in New York as Possible, I don't see anything wrong with Ann;''s statement at all.
Its us versus them
Much rather The Slimes people get taken out, than The Slimes cause me and my family to get killed by their constant leaks of vital , classified government anti-terrorist secrets to Al Quaeda.

[longtermmemmory]

how do we get to the advertisers?

Ford has problems with sales and is in junk bond status, how about making a issue of their advertising in the NYT?

[mathurine]

His poems didn't rhyme then, and still don't.

[gotribe]

Indeed. There wouldn't be much mourning in America over that.

[tame]

The First Amendment does not mean Times editor Bill Keller could kidnap a child and issue his ransom demands from the New York Times editorial page. He could not order a contract killing on the op-ed page. Nor can he take out a contract killing on Americans with a Page One story on a secret government program being used to track terrorists who are trying to kill Americans ...

That point cannot be overemphasized. Ann did a brilliant job, as usual. I love the following point-by-point comparison from her article (not cited above):

What if, instead of passing information from the government's secret nuclear program at Los Alamos directly to Soviet agents, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg had printed those same secrets in a newsletter? Would they have skated away scot-free instead of being tried for espionage and sent to the death chamber?

EXCELLENT Point!

Ann, the world owes you so much, and Leno should enlist you for ammo, rather than target you for attack. I LOVE you, Ann :o)

[Enterprise]

Billbears: "Well simpletons that look to Coulter for guidance probably couldn't do much better so I'll take that as your best...."

LOL - I really enjoy her work, but Mr Simon, I don't look to her for guidance. And I think a lot of people here who really like her work are not simpletons either.

[fanfan]

It could be worse.
Us simpletons could think like Rosie O'Donnell instead.

;-)

[billbears]

Oh goodie, ping a whole bunch of people in the hopes some will gang on. I'll say it again for those just joining in and this will be my last statement on the issue (as I was pinged to this thread to see Ann's 'intellect'). Ann Coulter is a talking head that has had nothing to add to actual debate in years. Simple 'bomb throwing' one liners with little to no factual statements to back them up make her nothing more than a loose cannon and not worth the time. Sure I read one of her books back in the Clinton years. Took all of one afternoon. And that schtick doesn't sell in actual debates. It may sell a lot of books (even if they are discounted to $4.99 at WorldNutDaily) but that's about it.

[GOPJ]

Freedom of them press, she explained "does not mean the government cannot prosecute reporters and editors for treason -- or for any other crime. The First Amendment does not mean Times editor Bill Keller could kidnap a child and issue his ransom demands from the New York Times editorial page. He could not order a contract killing on the op-ed page. Nor can he take out a contract killing on Americans with a Page One story on a secret government program being used to track terrorists who are trying to kill Americans ...

She's right.

[Xenalyte]

This isn't an article. This is a lengthy quotation of a Coulter column or two. Phil Brennan wrote maybe 30 words, most of them of the "Coulter said" and "Coulter charged" variety.

[arthurus]

Treason is such a useless word, now. Leftists wearit like a badge. Espionage is the crime here. Espionage by American citizens is, indeed Treason but call it espionage aas the sppies and those publishing the material provided by the spies are arrested and imprisoned pending short military tribunals and ropes.

[Enterprise]

"Ann Coulter is a talking head that has had nothing to add to actual debate in years."

Your opinion of "nothing" is out of sync with a quite a lot of people since so many vehemently disagree with her. But you would have to listen to the radio, watch TV, read the newspapers, or hang out at FreeRepublic to know that.

"Simple 'bomb throwing' one liners with little to no factual statements to back them up make her nothing more than a loose cannon and not worth the time."

When you get the chance, go get the books "Treason" and "Slander" and see for yourself how extensive her footnotes are to back up her "no factual statements."

"And that schtick doesn't sell in actual debates."

Most of the time when she is being interviewed, or when she is a guest on a cable show, there is little time for "debating." I will bet that if she were given ample time to debate a point she would clean the clock of her opponents.

"I was pinged to this thread to see Ann's 'intellect"

Alas, you have displayed none. But if you pay attention to Coulter you might get some. Tell the nice nurse to bring you your milk and cookies and say goodnight.

[Enterprise]

"Us simpletons could think like Rosie O'Donnell instead."

Fat Rosie is just jealous because Star lost weight.

[fanfan]

She's prettier too.

[zook]

"Pinch" oughta be real popular in prison.

[Jameison]

"Simple 'bomb throwing' one liners with little to no factual statements to back them up make her nothing more than a loose cannon and not worth the time"

Oh Puleeze!
Ann Coulter has more intelligence in her little finger than you have in your entire body, judging by the mindless garbage you keep posting on this thread.
Ann's books are chock full of facts which tell it like it is, and hammer the RATS and the moonbat loons where it hurts.
That might explain why you have your knickers in a twist.