Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Future fighter (F-35 Update)
Flight International ^ | 27 June 3006 | Graham Warwick

Posted on 06/26/2006 1:17:58 PM PDT by Yo-Yo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
The Monty Python aircraft program: "I'm not dead yet."
1 posted on 06/26/2006 1:18:01 PM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I'm kinda partial to Pratt & Whitney's F135 engine.

Success with that engine (and many others P&W makes, both commercial and military) is what helps me pay the bills!


2 posted on 06/26/2006 1:21:24 PM PDT by CT-Freeper (Said the perpetually dejected Mets fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

As long as the planes can hunt down and blow up terrorists or any enemy of the United States of America, I am all for it!


3 posted on 06/26/2006 1:24:56 PM PDT by MAD-AS-HELL (Put a mirror to the face of the republican party and all you'll see is a Donkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
This and other changes to increase fuel capacity and reduce drag pushed the F-35C’s radius of action close to 1,300km (700nm) – “100nm more than the requirement”, he says.

That's a pretty huge difference.

4 posted on 06/26/2006 1:26:58 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CT-Freeper; patton; sionnsar
Odd that he uses "40 lb" (ANSI units) when talking about structural weight, but "35 kg" (metric weights) when discussing equipment changes.

If that terminology carries into the design, methinks that's a formula for another NASA-type Mars-landing calculation disaster.
5 posted on 06/26/2006 1:33:18 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lepton

100 nanometers?


6 posted on 06/26/2006 1:33:25 PM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bkepley

heh. Yeah, abbreviations should be unique.


7 posted on 06/26/2006 1:34:35 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bkepley

hahaha i read that as "nanometers" too. i was like "damn accurate measurements!"


8 posted on 06/26/2006 1:37:36 PM PDT by Zeppelin (You've been Zarqed !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Zeppelin

hopefully nm is referring to nautical miles. A range of 700 nanaometers probably won't very useful.


9 posted on 06/26/2006 1:40:01 PM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

The maximum airspeed indicator is labelled in units of parsecs per picosecond.


10 posted on 06/26/2006 1:45:53 PM PDT by orionblamblam (I'm interested in science and preventing its corruption, so here I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Northrop-Grumman BUMP


11 posted on 06/26/2006 1:46:24 PM PDT by jrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
The biggest issue is clearing the helmet for ejection at 600kt while staying within the neck-load limits of the smallest pilots, he says, adding: “We are developing this for the broadest pilot population ever.”

My read is that it is costing a lot more to design a politically correct, inclusive a/c for female pilots.

12 posted on 06/26/2006 1:47:33 PM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
y'know, I believe that you are correct. When I was a young lad in Engineering school, the professors would regularly grouse about how much ANSI costs the US yearly.

I think that they were right, too.

13 posted on 06/26/2006 1:49:15 PM PDT by patton (...in spit of it all...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
A range of 700 nanaometers probably won't very useful.

Unless they're using fiber optics for the controls.

14 posted on 06/26/2006 1:49:28 PM PDT by SlowBoat407 (What is our exit strategy in the war on poverty?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
hopefully nm is referring to nautical miles. A range of 700 nanaometers probably won't very useful.

But think of all the fuel it would save!

15 posted on 06/26/2006 1:51:34 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Anyone tell me the major differences between this and the F22?


16 posted on 06/26/2006 1:54:59 PM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkepley; lepton
100 nanometers?

Don't laugh. F-22 distsnces are measured in Picometers.

17 posted on 06/26/2006 1:57:14 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Proudly Posting Without Reading the Article Since 1999 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bkepley

"100 nanometers?"

I think it's actually 100 nautical miles. You were close though. You were only off by a factor of 1,852,000,000,000.


18 posted on 06/26/2006 2:00:06 PM PDT by Moral Hazard (If Democrats win any more moral victories in November they'll gain moral control of Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV

F-22: Twin engine Air Dominance Fighter.
F-35: Single engine strike fighter.

The F-22 is to replace the F-15 in the Air Superiority role, while the F-35 is to replace the F-16, A-6, and AV-8B in the multirole strike figher role.


19 posted on 06/26/2006 2:01:07 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Aeronaut

Ping list?


20 posted on 06/26/2006 2:01:47 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson